HuckFinn
8 years ago

You poor poor little tender darlings....and speak for YOURSELF anyone else is pure poo poo


Says who the idiots on morning joe

TMCTLT wrote:



*spits* let's see, according to all polls your guy has a 35-38% approval rating.
So, I'm speaking for a chitload of people, sweetheart.


You made a poo poo?
Diaper change?
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

*spits* let's see, according to all polls your guy has a 35-38% approval rating.
So, I'm speaking for a chitload of people, sweetheart.


You made a poo poo?
Diaper change?

HuckFinn wrote:




He's YOUR guy too.


Oh, here comes the gnashing of teeth...melt away snowflake...melt away.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

He's YOUR guy too.


Oh, here comes the gnashing of teeth...melt away snowflake...melt away.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Nah. He's my biitch.

Pretty hair though. That what you like about him? No, really. It’s the hair, right?
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

Nah. He's my biitch.

Pretty hair though. That what you like about him? No, really. It’s the hair, right?

HuckFinn wrote:




He's your bitch? Other way around there Keyboard Commando. He doesn't even know you exist. You're not even a pimple on his ass. You, on the other hand are infatuated with the guy.

For the record...his hair? Either shave his head bald or get real plugs. If Sir Elton John can afford them and look better with them...he can too.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

He's your bitch? Other way around there Keyboard Commando. He doesn't even know you exist. You're not even a pimple on his ass. You, on the other hand are infatuated with the guy.

For the record...his hair? Either shave his head bald or get real plugs. If Sir Elton John can afford them and look better with them...he can too.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Gotcha. It IS the hair.
You've seen the pimples on Donnie's ass?
Eeww.[-(
tailgater
8 years ago

61 countries have now been insulted by our president:

http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/ ****hole-countries-where-trump-insulted-photos-beautiful-destinations-a8155676.html

To your point, Nonsense. If the chitkicker were on the other foot, if someone 'important' from another country insulted the USA I'm sure their citizens would feel the heat starting right at the airport en route to the US. Everyone has pride. Even folks our arrogant and entitled president has distain for. We're not that exceptional and special, ya know? Well maybe you think you are (?)

It's apparently ok with you, even fun, to insult people.
Great German word to describe your brand of pleasure and sense of humour: schadenfreud

HuckFinn wrote:




Newsflash: "important" people from other countries HAVE insulted us. Yet we don't make it dangerous for those citizens to travel here.

You're either a liar or delusional.
If there's a third choice, please enlighten us.


HuckFinn
8 years ago

Newsflash: "important" people from other countries HAVE insulted us. Yet we don't make it dangerous for those citizens to travel here.

You're either a liar or delusional.
If there's a third choice, please enlighten us.


tailgater wrote:


Or neither.
Get YOUR head out of the sand.
Do a search on the international backlash.

Yeah, yeah, they hate us already...who cares...
Sad (to me) that people would ever defend racism and stupidity.
But to not expect repercussions ....(!)

Here's dictionary.com definition of delusional:

Psychiatry. maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness

Fake news huh. Well, I ain't the one ignoring the facts.

Again, search international response to chithole comment.

Yeah, I'd cancel my travel plans but, hey, bon voyage!

bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
I would put the blame on the leakers on this one. Everyone knows Trump is an old fart with no filter, why feed the trolls (there's good trolls on both sides, both sides).
gummy jones
8 years ago

I would put the blame on the leakers on this one. Everyone knows Trump is an old fart with no filter, why feed the trolls (there's good trolls on both sides, both sides).

bgz wrote:



I know trump is going to say stupid things - doesn't make it right but I certainly expect it. wish he would tone it down.

the non stop leaking and overall level of mud slinging, on the other hand, has me feeling pretty disheartened (or at least more than usual) about the whole swamp. term limits can't come soon enough.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
When the goal is to negotiate and work with said shtholes, and everyone agrees it's the right thing to do, then why do stuff to screw that up.

That's my point.
gummy jones
8 years ago

When the goal is to negotiate and work with said shtholes, and everyone agrees it's the right thing to do, then why do stuff to screw that up.

That's my point.

bgz wrote:




because the ultimate goal is something else for the libs and the rhinos
teedubbya
8 years ago
There were no leakers. Trump didn't negotiate in good faith. He changed his mind from tuesday to thursday and got called on it. My understanding is he was bragging about it and the words used.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
Quit blowing holes in my narrative.
teedubbya
8 years ago
sorry I blew you and stuff
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
Oh, no problem, but you weren't supposed to tell anyone about that.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

I would put the blame on the leakers on this one. Everyone knows Trump is an old fart with no filter, why feed the trolls (there's good trolls on both sides, both sides).

bgz wrote:



Don't entirely disagree. But how many messengers do we have to kill before we take a hard look at our potus blabber mouth who's either too dumb or too arrogant to realize that he's not surrounded by friends and confidants?
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago

Don't entirely disagree. But how many messengers do we have to kill before we take a hard look at our potus blabber mouth who's either too dumb or too arrogant to realize that he's not surrounded by friends and confidants?

HuckFinn wrote:



Well, when you have an army of "me toos" (not that kind of me toos) trying to get their name in lights as a footnote in a Trump article, I wouldn't put it past some of them to embellish the context.

So they're better off just focusing on the task at hand, because nobody is going to remember who they were at best, and at worst, it's career suicide if they fail, Trump is a pretty good troll.
gummy jones
8 years ago
He said she said partisan garbage with turds like durbin leading the charge. Let's say Trump referred to some chitholes as such in a private meeting - are we to believe that that is the worst thing ever said? The tattle tail stuff is beyond old and shows that any negotiating in good faith is near impossible with the usual suspects.
tailgater
8 years ago

Or neither.
Get YOUR head out of the sand.
Do a search on the international backlash.

Yeah, yeah, they hate us already...who cares...
Sad (to me) that people would ever defend racism and stupidity.
But to not expect repercussions ....(!)

Here's dictionary.com definition of delusional:

Psychiatry. maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness

Fake news huh. Well, I ain't the one ignoring the facts.

Again, search international response to chithole comment.

Yeah, I'd cancel my travel plans but, hey, bon voyage!

HuckFinn wrote:





Before I tread on your sensibilities, let me explain that I'm not necessarily agreeing with how the President does his business. Nor do I disagree (like many here) simply because... Trump.
In this instance I am on record as being against what he said, considering the forum.

But the OVER reaction by the left is off the charts.

Next thing you know people will actually cancel their travel plans...
tailgater
8 years ago

When the goal is to negotiate and work with said shtholes, and everyone agrees it's the right thing to do, then why do stuff to screw that up.

That's my point.

bgz wrote:



This is a great point.

So the overall goal is to negotiate and work with certain nations.
President Trump hurts this objective by calling them names.
The "leakers" hurt this objective by telling everyone he said it. Otherwise nobody knows.

Hmm.
Sounds like in this case it's actually justified to shoot the messenger, for otherwise there is no harm done.

Users browsing this topic