This is possibly one of the largest problems with problem solving in our society in general, and bleeds into politics on a daily basis. It's a complete lack of logical problem solving skills...
I don't know who to blame... I'm not sure if it's schools who failed a generation, or if it's the devolution of politics into something more similar to a sporting event (discussion of which team is best involves more emotional attachment to locations and fealty to a team than actual logic frequently)....
But this is what we're left with:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/09/oxford-study-saying-trump-supporters-share-more-fake-news-is-fake-news.html?ICID=ref_fark So.... a study was put out by researchers at Oxford identifying Trump supporters as being the highest consumers of "fake news" (ie, they are reading articles which provide either false, or misleading information, or present completely unsupported information as if it were "facts"). As this is a university study, there are methods, data collected and a rationale to the conclusions they made.
But Fox News decides to put out an article claiming the study is "fake news". They link an article from Free Beacon (one of the news outlets identified as "fake news" in the study) which they apparently lifted word for word (without any editorial changes)... let that sink in a little... with no sense of irony, Fox News re-published the first 5 paragraphs (ie, the part with just unsupported statements)of an article from a site which is being debated as to whether it's "fake news" and published it as their own.
http://freebeacon.com/issues/the-oxford-study-saying-trump-supporters-share-more-fake-news-is-fake-news/ Now if you dig into the free beacon article, which seeks to rebut the "fake news" claim... their argument is this:
"There were 90 conservative news outlets and 6 liberal news outlets identified as fake news, and the liberal ones were just fringe sites... therefore the study is biased"....
So... with no other information available to them, their conclusion that more conservative sites were identified as "fake news" through a study than liberal sites was that the study was biased. They didn't actually bother discussing the method by which the researchers classified a news site as "fake news" ... no, they just claimed that because more conservative sites were labeled as "fake" it must be biased.
None of them stopped to think for a second, or as a question... "what if more conservative sites are passing false information"?
So, by default, their article would fit under "fake news" as it claims, without any support, that the research is biased and should automatically be disregarded...
Then fox re-publishes it word for word...
If you are a consumer of either of these sites and are not seriously bothered by the lack of logic involved in the decision making, you're probably part of the larger problem we have in our country today.