Mrs. dpnewell
8 years ago

Even though the right to safely sit in a classroom, without worries that you and your school might experience a shooting, that right, though not on the books or in the constitution trumps the 2nd amendment.

As stated in another thread what right could be more important than Life?

HuckFinn wrote:




You continue to insist that the fault lays with the tool and not the actor, so let's run with that. You also asked "what right could be more important than Life?". Let's see how strongly you believe what you preach.

Every year, over 10,000 Americans are killed on our highways by alcohol (remember, you blame the tool). The right of drivers to be able to travel our highways without the fear of an alcohol impaired driver plowing into them, trumps your right to enjoy alcohol. I mean, what right could be more important than life, correct?

Every SINGLE DAY, 9 Americans are killed and 1,000 are injured by cell phones (again, to be consistent, we must blame the tool). A driver's right to travel our highways, without being killed or maimed by a cell phone distracted driver, trumps your right to use a cell phone. Again, what right could be more important than life?

According to the National Safety Council, 7,000 people each year are killed by swimming pools. In addition, over 5,000 children each year are hospitalized for near drowning events. 20% of these children suffer permanent disabilities. A child's right to not be killed or permanently disabled by a swimming pool trumps your right to swim. Life is more important than recreation.

I could go on, and on, and on, but hopefully, you understand my point.

Oh, and before you go off on some tangent about how guns where "designed to kill", let me stop you right there. Guns where designed to do one thing. Fire a projectile. That projectile can be used for sport or competition, it can be used to put food on the table, it can be used to protect innocent life, and sadly, in the hands of a murderer, it can be used to take innocent life. The actor decides what that tool does. The tool has no mind of it's own. There are studies that show that guns are used hundreds of thousands of times each year to protect innocent life, or to prevent a crime, usually without firing a single shot. Taking this tool out of the hands of good folk, could result in several hundred thousand additional murders, rapes, robberies, assaults, etc. each year. Is this tradeoff worth your illusion (and yes, it is only an illusion) that school children would then be safe?

David (dpnewell)
frankj1
8 years ago

Let's make no mistake about this, demons are real and the modern term for it is really called mental health. Clearly if something in a person's mind possesses them to shoot up random innocent people that means all the checks and balances in that person's head have been elimated. A lot of people crack at an economic breakdown, relationship breaks, political/social breaks, family loss, et cetera. They're pretty weak willed. You have to be so well developed in life that nothing can break you. The Bible has a perfect example of this in Job. He is probably the one of the most deeply fortified men in history.

jjanecka wrote:


there is also the plausible view that before societies could comprehend the science of mental illness the only way to explain sick behavior was in the creation of demons and boogeymen...I mean, the sun circled the Earth, and stuff back then too.
victor809
8 years ago
Gotta agree with Frank here...
If you start your argument with an unequivocal statement that demons are real.... the rest of the argument sort of has to be wrong.
RMAN4443
8 years ago

You continue to insist that the fought lays with the tool and not the actor, so let's run with that. You also asked "what right could be more important than Life?". Let's see how strongly you believe what you preach.

Every year, over 10,000 Americans are killed on our highways by alcohol (remember, you blame the tool). The right of drivers to be able to travel our highways without the fear of an alcohol impaired driver plowing into them, trumps your right to enjoy alcohol. I mean, what right could be more important than life, correct?

Every SINGLE DAY, 9 Americans are killed and 1,000 are injured by cell phones (again, to be consistent, we must blame the tool). A driver's right to travel our highways, without being killed or maimed by a cell phone distracted driver, trumps your right to use a cell phone. Again, what right could be more important than life?

According to the National Safety Council, 7,000 people each year are killed by swimming pools. In addition, over 5,000 children each year are hospitalized for near drowning events. 20% of these children suffer permanent disabilities. A child's right to not be killed or permanently disabled by a swimming pool trumps your right to swim. Life is more important than recreation.

I could go on, and on, and on, but hopefully, you understand my point.

Oh, and before you go off on some tangent about how guns where "designed to kill", let me stop you right there. Guns where designed to do one thing. Fire a projectile. That projectile can be used for sport or competition, it can be used to put food on the table, it can be used to protect innocent life, and sadly, in the hands of a murderer, it can be used to take innocent life. The actor decides what that tool does. The tool has no mind of it's own. There are studies that show that guns are used hundreds of thousands of times each year to protect innocent life, or to prevent a crime, usually without firing a single shot. Taking this tool out of the hands of good folk, could result in several hundred thousand additional murders, rapes, robberies, assaults, etc. each year. Is this tradeoff worth your illusion (and yes, it is only an illusion) that school children would then be safe?

David (dpnewell)

Mrs. dpnewell wrote:



+1.............that's the point I was trying to make, but you did a much better job of it =d>
HuckFinn
8 years ago

You could be sitting in a classroom and be blown up, carbon monoxide poisoned, stabbed in the ear with a pencil.....The world is a dangerous place, you CANNOT legislate away all the dangers people face in the course of their lives........No place is safe from the dangers in the world, even your home is filled with danger--fall down stairs, slip in tub, fire........danger is all around you and no one is safe 😨

RMAN4443 wrote:


Yeah, it's a dangerous place this world. And if we can lessen the dangers we ought to.
It's more than gun legislation that's needed. But shooter's, well, use GUNS.
Here's just a few of their, uh, best hits.

Virginia Tech - 2007
Death toll: 33
Injured: 25

Sandy Hook - 2012
Death toll: 28
Injured: 2

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
Death toll: 17
Injured: 14

UT Austin - 1966
Death toll: 17
Injured: 31

Columbine High School - 1999
Death toll: 15
Injured: 21

Umpqua Community College Shooting - 2015
Death toll: 10
Injured: 9

Red Lake - 2005
Death toll: 10
Injured: 7

You get the idea. These kids weren't killed by sharp pencils. If they were then we'd intercede one way or the other, right?
Mr. Jones
8 years ago
Don't forget MK-ULTRA and SSG GANGSTALKING in many of these cases....not this latest Florida school thing...
That was set up from the get go by the secret service and the FBI, MONTHS IN ADVANCE....

But I believe 90+++% of all workplace shootings are caused by "WORK PLACE MOBBING" which is subsidized by
FBI-SSG OPERATIVES handing out massive amounts of cash to complete idiots with sadistic leanings who just OUTRIGHT DAY IN AND DAY OUT hound, intimidate , bully, and set up the EMPLOYEE they want fired in any way possible....CASH ...UNLIMITED CASH IS A MEANS TO AN END for any alphabet govt. Agency wanting to disappear anyone they percieve as "an enemy of the state" ...
EVEN IF THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL IS TOTALY INNOCENT...

Their are dozens of books about workplace mobbing on Amazon...purchase a few and OPEN YOUR EYES...
IT IS HAPPENING EVERYWHERE...EVERYDAY..

I have shown INFINITE RESTRAINT AGAINST THESE UNGODLY SADISTIC SOCIOPATH'S ...which confuses the f*k out of them...especially after the FBI-SSG DIVISION has tried to kill me outright over 8++ times...

My ACE IN THE HOLE is training and historical allies in the intelligence field covering my sorry azz 24-7-365...
In ghilly suits if need be...
As evidenced last weekend when I heard a firefight about 1/4 mile from my cabin...6 different calibers going off...
60-100 shots??
Over 2 minutes? Then human screaming...then nothing...then the cleaners came...
I think they learned a lesson...
THE HARD WAY...

I am " the I.N.N.O.C.E.N.T. SAINT"....

BELIEVE ME...if I did to them...what they did to me...
They would have gone crazy after about 18 months and who knows what they would have done?

Again, I am the most laid back f**ker in AMERICA as evidenced by my survival against these coward felon PRICKS with guns and badges who claim to be "LAW ENFORCEMENT"...<< what an oxymoron that is...
DrafterX
8 years ago
You can't have my guns... 🤐
HuckFinn
8 years ago

You continue to insist that the fought lays with the tool and not the actor, so let's run with that. You also asked "what right could be more important than Life?". Let's see how strongly you believe what you preach.

Already trying to format my response

Every year, over 10,000 Americans are killed on our highways by alcohol (remember, you blame the tool). The right of drivers to be able to travel our highways without the fear of an alcohol impaired driver plowing into them, trumps your right to enjoy alcohol. I mean, what right could be more important than life, correct?

If we could lower that number by making mandatory breathalyzers in all cars wouldn't that be a fair price to pay? I'd be in. You?


Every SINGLE DAY, 9 Americans are killed and 1,000 are injured by cell phones (again, to be consistent, we must blame the tool). A driver's right to travel our highways, without being killed or maimed by a cell phone distracted driver, trumps your right to use a cell phone. Again, what right could be more important than life?

Make the punishment for using your cell while driving severe enough to discourage/stop it. People reluctantly used seat belts at first until it hit their wallets a few times. How bout jail time for repeat offenders. Just to please Vic.

According to the National Safety Council, 7,000 people each year are killed by swimming pools. In addition, over 5,000 children each year are hospitalized for near drowning events. 20% of these children suffer permanent disabilities. A child's right to not be killed or permanently disabled by a swimming pool trumps your right to swim. Life is more important than recreation.

I could go on, and on, and on, but hopefully, you understand my point.

I know. You could.

Oh, and before you go off on some tangent about how guns where "designed to kill", let me stop you right there. Guns where designed to do one thing. Fire a projectile. That projectile can be used for sport or competition, it can be used to put food on the table, it can be used to protect innocent life, and sadly, in the hands of a murderer, it can be used to take innocent life. The actor decides what that tool does. The tool has no mind of it's own. There are studies that show that guns are used hundreds of thousands of times each year to protect innocent life, or to prevent a crime, usually without firing a single shot. Taking this tool out of the hands of good folk, could result in several hundred thousand additional murders, rapes, robberies, assaults, etc. each year. Is this tradeoff worth your illusion (and yes, it is only an illusion) that school children would then be safe?

David (dpnewell)

Mrs. dpnewell wrote:



Guns are fun. And in society, necessary. Yup, they're tools. But they ain't hammers.
And all your relating alchohol or swimming to guns is beyond silly imo.
It's a straw man argument.

Pro gun folks like to make the argument that cars are deadly also. My answer: when 100s of students are killed by homicidal students on school property we should seriously look in to it. Until then, well, how bout them guns...

And now my short rant. I realize most at cbid have the home court advantage when it comes to anything guns. I do a lot of answering questions and talking to myself in these threads.
And as you are among 'friends', you don't really need conversation. You want confirmation. And I get that. Maybe I'm at the wrong site for me. *crickets*

Here's what's bugging me lately in this gun debate: I know it has nothing to do with "rights"
When I hear someone say 2nd amendment, or God given rights I'm sort of grateful that you can't see me.
It's not about rights per se. Does anybody here really care about rights? How about gay rights? Don't you think, like most guys, that back when woman insisted they deserved the right to vote you wouldn't have joined the parade and advocated loudly for them?
Or black rights during the Civil Rights movement? Or more recently the invasion of our right privacy by Cambridge Analytica. Where's the uproar for that? *again....crickets*

Or how about the rights of the admittedly thoughtless comedian Kathy Griffin who posted that stupid photo of her holding Trump's bloody head. When she lost all as a result of exercising her right of free speech did we, anyone come to her defense? Nope. Free speech. The 1st amendment.
It's not about your rights. It's about guns. You like them and you're responsible citizens that want to keep them. I get and respect that. No bs.
But if there's zero wiggle room for new approaches IF it means tighter gun restrictions than it's just selfishness imo.
victor809
8 years ago
With ya till the end there huck...
But CamAnal and Griffith were not examples of citizen rights being taken away.

She was not jailed or punished by the govt for her words, and CamAnal used a private company's freely given data to screw with us.

Too often the right whines about their 1st amendment rights being taken when it has nothing to do with actual 1st amendment rights. Let's not start emulating them by doing the same.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

With ya till the end there huck...
But CamAnal and Griffith were not examples of citizen rights being taken away.

She was not jailed or punished by the govt for her words, and CamAnal used a private company's freely given data to screw with us.

Too often the right whines about their 1st amendment rights being taken when it has nothing to do with actual 1st amendment rights. Let's not start emulating them by doing the same.

victor809 wrote:


We don't have a right to privacy?
And she was blacklisted..tour cancelled etc
Ewok126
8 years ago
My question is this... Is Freedom a Right?
Also when one says "Restrictions" what "Restrictions" are we speaking of.
victor809
8 years ago
Blacklisted is a response to your right.
You have a right to say what you want. You do not have a right to not have to face repercussions. Plenty of moronic conservatives have said racist or homophobic things and been correctly blacklisted by advertisers.

One doesn't have a right to not have to face people not liking what you say or do.
victor809
8 years ago
You have a right to privacy.... from government.

If you load all your crap on Facebook and that data gets leaked... that's not a rights issue. It's a contract violation issue at best. It's only a rights issue if the government forces facebook to give it to them.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

You have a right to privacy.... from government.

If you load all your crap on Facebook and that data gets leaked... that's not a rights issue. It's a contract violation issue at best. It's only a rights issue if the government forces facebook to give it to them.

victor809 wrote:


So only the government can violate your rights?

Seems like a narrow definition....
HuckFinn
8 years ago

My question is this... Is Freedom a Right?
Also when one says "Restrictions" what "Restrictions" are we speaking of.

Ewok126 wrote:


I don't think there is a patent answer for that first question.
Where you goin' with this Ewok?
victor809
8 years ago
The entirety of the bill of rights (which you are referencing if you discuss free speech or privacy) is based on what the government cannot do to citizens.
DrafterX
8 years ago
Then why are there hate crimes..?? 😕
victor809
8 years ago
There is no "freedom of speech" between two non government entities. Think about how you would really imagine that happening. It can't without someone committing a crime.

Similarly with right to privacy. Other than the government, your privacy can't really be invaded without a law being broken.
HuckFinn
8 years ago
I get it. But there are historically, what's called "natural rights". Ancient rights.
Inalienable rights. Not legal ones. Social even contractual rights.

Whatever...
HuckFinn
8 years ago

Then why are there hate crimes..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:


Hate them
Users browsing this topic