You continue to insist that the fought lays with the tool and not the actor, so let's run with that. You also asked "what right could be more important than Life?". Let's see how strongly you believe what you preach.
Every year, over 10,000 Americans are killed on our highways by alcohol (remember, you blame the tool). The right of drivers to be able to travel our highways without the fear of an alcohol impaired driver plowing into them, trumps your right to enjoy alcohol. I mean, what right could be more important than life, correct?
Every SINGLE DAY, 9 Americans are killed and 1,000 are injured by cell phones (again, to be consistent, we must blame the tool). A driver's right to travel our highways, without being killed or maimed by a cell phone distracted driver, trumps your right to use a cell phone. Again, what right could be more important than life?
According to the National Safety Council, 7,000 people each year are killed by swimming pools. In addition, over 5,000 children each year are hospitalized for near drowning events. 20% of these children suffer permanent disabilities. A child's right to not be killed or permanently disabled by a swimming pool trumps your right to swim. Life is more important than recreation.
I could go on, and on, and on, but hopefully, you understand my point.
Oh, and before you go off on some tangent about how guns where "designed to kill", let me stop you right there. Guns where designed to do one thing. Fire a projectile. That projectile can be used for sport or competition, it can be used to put food on the table, it can be used to protect innocent life, and sadly, in the hands of a murderer, it can be used to take innocent life. The actor decides what that tool does. The tool has no mind of it's own. There are studies that show that guns are used hundreds of thousands of times each year to protect innocent life, or to prevent a crime, usually without firing a single shot. Taking this tool out of the hands of good folk, could result in several hundred thousand additional murders, rapes, robberies, assaults, etc. each year. Is this tradeoff worth your illusion (and yes, it is only an illusion) that school children would then be safe?
David (dpnewell)
Mrs. dpnewell wrote: