HuckFinn
8 years ago

As he walks away shaking his head, he could be heard to mumble ..... "and all this time I though Banderi was the one with the incurable TDS........."

Mrs. dpnewell wrote:


Yeah, but you'll be back...
Abrignac
8 years ago

You're right about only one thing TG, it's a waste of time trying to 'argue' with folks like you.
Folks who desperately need to keep things simple. Do zero research. Keep things black or white. CNN bad. Liars. Other side. Leftists.

Pathetic.

Oh, you're right a second time! I should never had used the word compassionate.

Trump is ffucking up our country, our alliances, conspiring with enemies, walking away from the Paris pact endangering our environment and kids' futures, starting trade wars, and possibly breaking our alliances with multiple nations and scrapping the Iran deal which would mean that within just a matter of years, unmonitered, they'll have the bomb....

It's an impressive list. So maybe you're right a third time, he can multitask.

Heil Donald!

HuckFinn wrote:



Someone break out the oatmeal and Kool-Aid.
tailgater
8 years ago
Huck has lost it.

Too bad.

He coulda been a contender!



tailgater
8 years ago

You're right about only one thing TG, it's a waste of time trying to 'argue' with folks like you.
Folks who desperately need to keep things simple. Do zero research. Keep things black or white. CNN bad. Liars. Other side. Leftists.

Pathetic.

Oh, you're right a second time! I should never had used the word compassionate.

Trump is ffucking up our country, our alliances, conspiring with enemies, walking away from the Paris pact endangering our environment and kids' futures, starting trade wars, and possibly breaking our alliances with multiple nations and scrapping the Iran deal which would mean that within just a matter of years, unmonitered, they'll have the bomb....

It's an impressive list. So maybe you're right a third time, he can multitask.

Heil Donald!

HuckFinn wrote:



It's funny when Huck debates with himself.
Some would call him a Master at it.


HuckFinn
8 years ago
Trumps approval rating just dropped to 39%



tailgater
8 years ago
Insanity: Obsessing over something that you admit you will never be open minded towards.


Huck, my misguided brother, if Trumps approval rating were 99% you wouldn't care. So why would it matter if it's at 39% or at 0.9%?

Strange how quickly the TDS progresses.

HuckFinn
8 years ago
Shortsightedness: idolizing a dangerous leader (see pigheaded)

Donald is trusted and actually popular in just two places: West Virginia and cbid

And are Donald's whiney ways getting to me? Yup.

You hear what he had to say this morning about Comeys interview last night?

Embarrassing. Give a listen. Tell me again how he's the great multitasker. Sane genius indeed

The next president you'll want to elect and defend will no doubt be a knuckle dragger.



Abrignac
8 years ago

Shortsightedness: idolizing a dangerous leader (see pigheaded)

Donald is trusted and actually popular in just two places: West Virginia and cbid

And are Donald's whiney ways getting to me? Yup.

You hear what he had to say this morning about Comeys interview last night?

Embarrassing. Give a listen. Tell me again how he's the great multitasker. Sane genius indeed

The next president you'll want to elect and defend will no doubt be a knuckle dragger.



HuckFinn wrote:



IBTL
tailgater
8 years ago

Shortsightedness: idolizing a dangerous leader (see pigheaded)

Donald is trusted and actually popular in just two places: West Virginia and cbid

And are Donald's whiney ways getting to me? Yup.

You hear what he had to say this morning about Comeys interview last night?

Embarrassing. Give a listen. Tell me again how he's the great multitasker. Sane genius indeed

The next president you'll want to elect and defend will no doubt be a knuckle dragger.



HuckFinn wrote:



Reality: a place huck once read about.


If Trump is only popular in WV and here, how did he win an election?

Oh yeah.
Russia.

Dude, you get stupider and stupider with every post.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

Reality: a place huck once read about.


If Trump is only popular in WV and here, how did he win an election?

Oh yeah.
Russia.

Dude, you get stupider and stupider with every post.

tailgater wrote:


Yeah. Objectivity must look like stupidity to Trump cultists.

39%

But carry on.

Just please, you're starting to whine like your hero TG.

Deep breaths.

Golden showers.


tailgater
8 years ago
Objectivity: I don't think that word means what you think it means.


HuckFinn
8 years ago

Objectivity: I don't think that word means what you think it means.


tailgater wrote:


You must love typing.

Cause you never have anything substantial to say. I want to say anymore....but..I really wanna..

Why don't you do some research on Benedict Donald and then we'll talk.

He's dirty amigo.
tailgater
8 years ago

Pity: the most appropriate reaction to huck's snowballing insanity.




DrafterX
8 years ago
Hillary lost... 😟
ecr
  • ecr
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago

Trumps approval rating just dropped to 39%



HuckFinn wrote:




And you still trust the polls, good plan!






tailgater
8 years ago
Hey guys, lay off the Huckster.

TDR is a disease.

He just needs some alone time in a padded cell, er, ah, I mean Serenity Room.


HuckFinn
8 years ago

And you still trust the polls, good plan!






ecr wrote:


Oh? Never trust polls again? Or the media? Or the FBI? Or private citizens that accuse him of payoffs and serious physical threats? Or Trump gofers who've plead guilty of running Dons illegal errands? Just trust Trump? Only he is honest and honorable? Accept that were leaving the Paris pact? Or abandoning the Iran agreement? This is a plan? Maybe you think the WH should control polling. They're accurate and honest.

Absurd. So the polls can be wrong. Doesn't happen that often. Happens. Right?

Polling is an important mechanism. Sometimes it gets people off their couch when they watch the news and see what's trending.

From Gallop's site:
Polls tell us what proportion of a population has a
specific viewpoint. They do not explain why
respondents believe as they do or how to change their
minds. This is the work of social scientists and
scholars. Polls are simply a measurement tool that
tells us how a population thinks and feels about any
given topic.
This can be useful in helping different cultures
understand one another because it gives the people a
chance to speak for themselves instead of letting only
vocal media stars speak on behalf of all. Opinion
polling gives people who do not usually have access to
the media an opportunity to be heard

But apparently many Americans, like you and Donald know they're unnecessary or bogus. Well, unless of course the numbers indicated trumps approval rating was really high.

Erroneous.

Probably checking out multiple polling sources is part of a better plan.

But there's also this: let's stop pretending we want an open democratic society, eliminate checks and balances, free press, free speech etc. and just rally round Donald. Declare him dictator and quit this charade.
Hey, if it means the stock market and my 401k is growing, then wtf, right?
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

Oh? Never trust polls again? Or the media? Or the FBI?

HuckFinn wrote:



You shouldn't. Look at how bitter you still are after believing the ones that told you that c@nt was going to win! You're off the chain with absurdity and hilarity! IT's like 2...2...2 treats in one!

Absurd. So the polls can be wrong. Doesn't happen that often. Happens. Right?

HuckFinn wrote:



Yes they can and often are. Ever wonder why there's a "margin of error"? Yeah. When you asked biased questions of a pool at your own choosing one can only deduce that they're fishing for a desired answer. The only poll in the last Presidential election that had it right was Rasmussen! People didn't want to believe what I saw on the ground here in Central Florida. Trump and even Bernie were packing arenas and airport hangers and she was playing to 1000 seat bars and a community college that had to give a free day to students if they attended. The result was more people on the sides of the road that she had to see carrying signs that read..."Trump That B!tch!", "Hillary for Prison!" and "It Matters Now!"...comical stuff and she only played to 200 people...this the day before the election! Time really well spent. You sucked it up like biscuits and gravy and bought whatever Ratchit Meddow was peddling on PMSNBC. Keep on believing the "talking heads" and the pollsters. Might want to get on Xanax too!

Polling is an important mechanism. Sometimes it gets people off their couch when they watch the news and see what's trending.

HuckFinn wrote:



Like I detailed above it's a designed outcome. If you want to skew the answer to favor your point then you use more of the people from this area, income and political opinion. If it's not trending right you add more till it's in whatever you want the "margin of error" to be.

You can believe in polls all you want. You will get lied to again as well. I've already told you how Trump was elected. The DNC let her steal a primary...no charges for that either!...weaponize intelligence agencies against private citizens...lie to Congress...and America is sick and tired of there being rules for them and rules for that rapist and her. I really don't understand why you still side with her. Are you getting paid by her? That gravy train is almost at the station.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

You shouldn't. Look at how bitter you still are after believing the ones that told you that c@nt was going to win! You're off the chain with absurdity and hilarity! IT's like 2...2...2 treats in one!



Yes they can and often are. Ever wonder why there's a "margin of error"? Yeah. When you asked biased questions of a pool at your own choosing one can only deduce that they're fishing for a desired answer. The only poll in the last Presidential election that had it right was Rasmussen! People didn't want to believe what I saw on the ground here in Central Florida. Trump and even Bernie were packing arenas and airport hangers and she was playing to 1000 seat bars and a community college that had to give a free day to students if they attended. The result was more people on the sides of the road that she had to see carrying signs that read..."Trump That B!tch!", "Hillary for Prison!" and "It Matters Now!"...comical stuff and she only played to 200 people...this the day before the election! Time really well spent. You sucked it up like biscuits and gravy and bought whatever Ratchit Meddow was peddling on PMSNBC. Keep on believing the "talking heads" and the pollsters. Might want to get on Xanax too!



Like I detailed above it's a designed outcome. If you want to skew the answer to favor your point then you use more of the people from this area, income and political opinion. If it's not trending right you add more till it's in whatever you want the "margin of error" to be.

You can believe in polls all you want. You will get lied to again as well. I've already told you how Trump was elected. The DNC let her steal a primary...no charges for that either!...weaponize intelligence agencies against private citizens...lie to Congress...and America is sick and tired of there being rules for them and rules for that rapist and her. I really don't understand why you still side with her. Are you getting paid by her? That gravy train is almost at the station.

DrMaddVibe wrote:


Impressive how you turned it in to a Hillary bashing! I guess its always going to be the common denominator for any rightist argument. Trump won. I don't need to get over that result. You guys do. Stop thinking you're taunting anyone with that accusation. Its dumb. It's absurd to think I distrust Trump because i feel cheated. I distrust him because my eyes are wide open and i know he's a liar and a cheat. (I know, Hillary blah, blah, blah) Not a big fan of reality, but I live in it. 'Hillary lost'. So...enough. Unless that's all ya got...



I watch fox and one america news as much as cnn or MSNBC. I check out polls, yeah, even Rasmussen, who btw was wrong about the Obama Romney margins (among other things ) and are constantly accused of selective polling , but are admittedly relatively accurate. But to be fair, from wikipedia:Time magazine has described Rasmussen Reports as a "conservative-leaning polling group." The Washington Post called Rasmussen a "polarizing pollster." John Zogby said that Scott Rasmussen has a "conservative constituency." The Center for Public Integrity listed "Scott Rasmussen Inc" as a paid consultant for the 2004 George W. Bush campaign. The Washington Post reported that the 2004 Bush re-election campaign had used a feature on the Rasmussen Reports website that allowed customers to program their own polls.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports 


They were right about the last election.




DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

Trump won.

HuckFinn wrote:




Deal with it all ready little man
Users browsing this topic