cute synopsis, reads like a disparaging Trump tweet, effectively minimizes what we are now learning about...but I don't actually care how many times he has cheated. Or other people either. I wouldn't call for impeachment either. (Gummy, please note that in my "body of work" I have repeatedly said I hope for the good of the nation it does not come to that...hardly the stuff of a deranged hater)

For me, it would be unconscionable to behave that way, and Caren would kill me. I'm calling out the Holier-than-thou.

Oh, and since it does matter to you, your guy did look at you and say it didn't happen, and that he not only didn't pay her to shut up but didn't know that Cohen had done so, and didn't know where the money came from, and then came Rudy.

So rather than tell me I am out of whack about Trump, let me clarify that I'm not but you made the distinction again about how being lied to your face made a difference.

Well now you know the truth. But it won't bother you. Really doesn't change my life either, I always figured he did chit and lied. same as most before him. But I don't only forgive or look away from the perps who are libs. Consistency in values.

frankj1 wrote:

Please, someone explain how Trump's pickle is different from Clinton's?

delta1 wrote:

No big dill.

tailgater wrote:

Please, someone explain how Trump's pickle is different from Clinton's?

delta1 wrote:

Frank, I'm not mad at you. It's the internet. If someone disagreeing with you or letting you know that a comment of yours has offended them is grounds for you taking your ball and going home then you don't internet much. But we know that's not true.

But you state I am generalizing after you made multiple disparaging and back handed comments about a very large group of people to which you don't belong. I know it's easy to do and all the cool kids are doing it. perhaps some here Identify with those groups and do not enjoy having words put in their mouths so regularly. I don't consider myself "moral" but man I'm better than I used to be.

You then quickly deflect my comments and state you are (in essence) only talking about the bad moral folks. Okay, but that isn't what you said. Once again, and as others have pointed out, your problem is with Trump. He is the epitome of offensive to you, not the religious right zealots or what ever else you called us. He is the reason you post in these threads.

You take issue with me mentioning your body of work (anti Trump posts any given chance) but state you have, in fact, "hardened" your opposition recently. I'm not sure why you are upset we've noticed? Thank you for the admission so we no longer need rely on your body of work.

Once again, you are mad I have miscategorized you and feel it is unfair. I am telling you that I self identify (trendy, I know) with a group that you have regularly miscategorized and wonder if you find yourself unfair as well? Probably not as you readily admit you are one of the most fair and open minded. Thanks for clearing that up.

I know you say in your rebuttal that you aren't actually commenting on the group you are commenting on but rather the bad ones in that group. Well, assume I'm not talking to the fair and open minded Frank but rather the one who is incredibly partisan and self righteous at times.

You feel you deserve better? Well, I think better of you, trust me. If you look through my posts (don't waste your time doing it) you will see I don't respond to many people ever. Certainly never to certain people. Waste of time and I really don't care. Think of it as a friend telling you you have food in your teeth.

Also, you mad bro? I'm really not mad. Seriously. Sorry took me so long to respond but I had the kiddos away for the weekend.

gummy jones wrote:

But you don't think your wife could handle another broke back mountain episode?

gummy jones wrote: