frankj1
7 years ago

The question was asked in previous iterations of the census. Obama was in office when it stopped.

Trump wanted it asked again, and the sky fell.

That was my point. If, in fact, the information IS being gathered in other ways... say so. Don't say Trump is racist for wanting the question asked and make a big to-do about it.

According to AOC... Pelosi is now racist, the tards have come full circle with this ridiculous "everyone who disagrees with me is racist" BS.

MACS wrote:


it has been said multiple times over a million posts that the info is available in several other ways, including a yearly survey conducted by the Census Bureau...plus data from Social Security and even more.
And that info is true.

the Supreme Court is politely asking, like you are, what is the real purpose?

We are all waiting...or at least we were all waiting for the reworded answer, AKA second chance at saving face.

But if the real reason was based on the paid/hired consultant's suggestion, then we have our answer. Not necessarily racism, but definitely that the Administration believes it would create enough intimidation to suppress responses from assumed potential Democrat voters.

The key here is that the GOP buys into this.

I simply can not keep explaining this.

Thank God it's over.

I'm more convinced than ever TDS is really about Trump's explainerists and apologists.
MACS
7 years ago
Pardon me, sir... but I hadn't seen the other threads.

I don't usually venture out of the general discussion much. I occasionally look/post in politics and pictures, though.
frankj1
7 years ago

Pardon me, sir... but I hadn't seen the other threads.

I don't usually venture out of the general discussion much. I occasionally look/post in politics and pictures, though.

MACS wrote:


you know it's all good wif us.
Was just trying to summarize 200 posts that preceded yours.
tailgater
7 years ago



I'm more convinced than ever TDS is really about Trump's explainerists and apologists.

frankj1 wrote:



Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you.

tailgater
7 years ago

a version of FOR a friend.

you guys gonna be able to get together wif us guys?

frankj1 wrote:



I'm waiting for my better half to explain her mid week availability.
Should know before weekend is over.
tailgater
7 years ago
But short answer is YES.
Whatever it takes.
We miss Caren.


frankj1
frankj1
7 years ago
izonfire
7 years ago

a version of FOR a friend.

frankj1 wrote:



But short answer is YES.
Whatever it takes.
We miss Caren.

tailgater wrote:



I guess that explains the aversion.
If it weren’t for Caren, they wouldn’t be carin’.

Poor Frank...
frankj1
7 years ago

I guess that explains the aversion.
If it weren’t for Caren, they wouldn’t be carin’.

Poor Frank...

izonfire wrote:


well, she really is lovely


aren't you word-played out yet?
delta1
7 years ago

You're trying too hard.
It was a simple question to a statement you presented as fact.
Your shotgun approach to find a suitable response is not entirely unexpected considering the flaw in your initial quip.



tailgater wrote:



hah...says the guy who lusts after the last word...on every dammm thing...
izonfire
7 years ago

aren't you word-played out yet?

frankj1 wrote:



Don’t know Frank.
We’ll hafta see how it plays out...
Speyside
7 years ago
Once SCOTUS has ruled, is there any other legal resource?
frankj1
7 years ago
Putin is the deciderer
Users browsing this topic