And, speycifically, what legitimizes it in this guy's mind?
He's not stupid. While there's some real problems with consistency, message and facts....the writing is mostly coherent and passable English. So, I sort of get a feel for what's going on in the guy's head...but I can't help but think that there's a pretty big disconnect between the thoughts and the action. I might look at it a little different if he were to join in some coalition or nationalist group with a strategic vision. But, he's smart enough to have known that killing some Mexicans was not likely to get this country on the track that he wants. So, while he might have meant much of what he wrote, I don't think its necessarily so directly connected to his actions Saturday.
Not only that, I don't believe that even a supremacist would be confident enough to shoot up a crowded Walmart confident that he'd only kill Hispanics.
And, didn't he surrender pretty easily?....even though he wrote about how that could not be considered a potential outcome....changed his mind? not going to overanalyze any more ....I just want to keep in my mind the disconnects before citing any of it for any reason
dstieger wrote: