opelmanta1900
6 years ago
I don't believe most logical people would sabotage their career and risk their life being a traitor to their country by vowing to disrupt the actions of the president simply because they don't like it that Hillary lost... I'm guessing there's a handful of youngsters that might be dumb enough to pen an anonymous letter admitting to treason, but not many...
frankj1
6 years ago

Because he literally wrote a long unsigned letter promising to do everything he could to violate the will of the people by interfering with the president...

We all knew he'd blow something eventually....

opelmanta1900 wrote:


so the NY Times recently printed this (it looks pretty familiar from a while ago) and says the author is the whistleblower?

This just isn't lining up correctly.
Not to mention (so of course I will...) that the whistle guy has been at least partly identified as a CIA person formerly assigned to the White House who reported after being told of stuff by current official on the WH staff.
This writer claims to be a senior official on the job as chit is going down.

and it sounds like at least half the time efforts being described were by non-demented believers trying to prevent Trump from committing impeachable crimes.

I have to add that I recall thinking it's a phony letter when it first made the rounds, and that has not changed.
It's a fake.
opelmanta1900
6 years ago
Did you just call the NY times fake news?
fishinguitarman
6 years ago
teedubbya
6 years ago
It's all part of the deflection. Maybe if you focused on what the Prez did and is doing rather than all the made up reasons not to things would look different.


You presented that as why the whistle blower was a traitor and committed sabotage.

The whistle blower followed all of the rules (at least according to the IG, Grassley etc. If you really believe the nonsense you posted (which looks like it was prior to the Ukrain stuff but I don't know) and thus can stick your head in the sand then I feel for you.

If someone in the government is doing wrong lets take a look. The WB doesn't look like they did. But lets take a look and not ignore whats right in front of us as well.
teedubbya
6 years ago
Ah never mind. I forgot about the press.
victor809
6 years ago

Did you just call the NY times fake news?

opelmanta1900 wrote:



Opel News Network is not off to a strong start.....
teedubbya
6 years ago

Opel News Network is not off to a strong start.....

victor809 wrote:




Yes it is. It will soon replace FOX
victor809
6 years ago

Yes it is. It will soon replace FOX

teedubbya wrote:



Fox was already replaced. I think you mean it will soon replace OANN
opelmanta1900
6 years ago
We're actually in talks to merge with Jezebel... but they want points in the hank hides business and I'm just not sure we're willing to part with that kinda value prior to our ipo...
victor809
6 years ago
You'll never get jezebel. Your best bet is to aim for brietbart.... or maybe guest videos on the PragerU youtube channel.
opelmanta1900
6 years ago
As the president and CEO of hank hides incorporated, I assure you, we can get anyone...
victor809
6 years ago

As the president and CEO of hank hides incorporated, I assure you, we can get anyone...

opelmanta1900 wrote:



psh... hank sticking things in his butt is so 2018. If you don't innovate and diversify Hank Hides Inc will fade away like all other 1 hit wonders.
frankj1
6 years ago

Did you just call the NY times fake news?

opelmanta1900 wrote:


any different than if they quote the Prez when he is lying?
or are you saying the Times created the fake letter like a year before the whistleblower blew the whistle?
cuz that would be significantly different.
teedubbya
6 years ago
I heard there was no quid pro quo but now that evidence is showing there clearly was quid pro quos are ok and stuff. so transparent it is illegal in many countries.
victor809
6 years ago
It's going to take at least a decade to unravel all the insanity around this president. I have a suspicion that it's going to be really crazy to find out what actually happened.
frankj1
6 years ago
he's planning on staying on after his second term.
at least that's what I heard.
delta1
6 years ago
not only does he want to stay on after a second term, he wants the job for life...
teedubbya
6 years ago

not only does he want to stay on after a second term, he wants the job for life...

delta1 wrote:




He needs it. Because what comes after may not be pleasant
delta1
6 years ago
the period of American history after Trump will likely be considered the dawn of a new era....


the darkest hour is before the dawn...
Users browsing this topic