MACS
delta1
6 years ago
most cons are anti-government and pro-business...that's understandable, given that our American economy is built on private enterprise...

but private enterprise has a history of being destructive, conniving, and in worst case scenarios, even cons demand that govt. intervene to fix the problems: for example, the Great Depression and Great Recession...
DrMaddVibe
6 years ago


but private enterprise has a history of being destructive, conniving, and in worst case scenarios, even cons demand that govt. intervene to fix the problems: for example, the Great Depression and Great Recession...

delta1 wrote:



Both of those were government at the wheel debacles.
DrMaddVibe
6 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAN9OwmMiW8

MACS wrote:



When they're done shoving this attention whore in our face and she serves no purpose I might feel bad for her.
CelticBomber
6 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAN9OwmMiW8

MACS wrote:




I don't think I've heard of this news network. Are they balanced or is it a Republican outlet? Serious question. I agreed with that woman's take on the issue, just wondering if it's something I should add to my subscriptions or are they a conservative version of The Young Turks (I love watching their election night meltdown) type of Youtube news network?


Side note: My initial reaction to that lady was "Wow she's HOT!" then I noticed the WAY overdone makeup. Anyone else turned off by that? There are some really pretty woman who ruin their natural beauty with an inch thick layer of makeup.... it's an immediate turn off for me no matter how pretty the woman is....
MACS
6 years ago
It's more conservative than FOX. Also more fair and balanced because she will frequently have people with opposing viewpoints and she lets them speak, and often gives them the last word.

She occasionally sensationalizes, but nothing like FOX or CNN, IMO.
victor809
6 years ago

I don't think I've heard of this news network. Are they balanced or is it a Republican outlet? Serious question.

CelticBomber wrote:


No
When trump dumped fox this is the network he chose to bring into the public light because they sucked his butt more.

They have been found lying directly to their viewers a number of times and do not in any way even attempt to rectify their information, in fact they double down when they are shown to be wrong

Macs likes to watch them and use them as a source here. Probably because they give him the news he wants, not the actual information he needs.
Mrs. dpnewell
6 years ago
OK, avoiding all the off topic bickering and getting back to dear Greta. She apologized today for saying that we need to put politicians up against a wall. She claims she didn't know what she was saying at the time. I personally feel she's being fed scripts from her handlers and has no idea what she is saying most of the time.

David
Tittums
6 years ago

OK, avoiding all the off topic bickering and getting back to dear Greta. She apologized today for saying that we need to put politicians up against a wall. She claims she didn't know what she was saying at the time. I personally feel she's being fed scripts from her handlers and has no idea what she is saying most of the time.

David

Mrs. dpnewell wrote:



Of course she is being fed scripts. Children are good at doing as told when an adult makes them feel like they are on equal ground. This will go away like the Florida kids.

Geta says what, we're all dead in 10 years? AOC says we're dead in 12. Bernie says 11. I say those are all far too long. The nightmare these people envision as their perfect world is one that should die before it's born.

52 trillion for universal healthcare in America. Do you really want to live to see that? I don't.

Meanwhile, when you are bankrupting nations for this green nightmare China is polluting far more than the rest. You are not doing anything for "climate change" "global warming" whatever new phrase poll tests better like "bribery". You want to do something about all this evil pollution? You're going to have to go to war with China, and not some silly trade war but actual war.
victor809
6 years ago

OK, avoiding all the off topic bickering and getting back to dear Greta. She apologized today for saying that we need to put politicians up against a wall. She claims she didn't know what she was saying at the time. I personally feel she's being fed scripts from her handlers and has no idea what she is saying most of the time.

David

Mrs. dpnewell wrote:



I don't know, her explanation was that it's a literal translation from a swedish idiom. There's apparently a swedish idiom which translated literally means "put them up against a wall" with the connotation of meaning "hold them accountable". The same way we have sayings like "hold their feet to the fire" or "rub your nutsack against their face until they finally are willing to stick their tongue out"...

Now, unfortunately, I cannot get past the noise in the searches right now to see whether this is a common phrase, but it passes an initial sniff test. Seems likely this literally was just a direct translation error, and she is speaking from her own words.
fishinguitarman
6 years ago
Please tell us more! Everyone respects your opinion because it’s the only right one
tailgater
6 years ago

I don't know, her explanation was that it's a literal translation from a swedish idiom. There's apparently a swedish idiom which translated literally means "put them up against a wall" with the connotation of meaning "hold them accountable". The same way we have sayings like "hold their feet to the fire" or "rub your nutsack against their face until they finally are willing to stick their tongue out"...

Now, unfortunately, I cannot get past the noise in the searches right now to see whether this is a common phrase, but it passes an initial sniff test. Seems likely this literally was just a direct translation error, and she is speaking from her own words.

victor809 wrote:




Don't listen to the lynch mob...


victor809
6 years ago

Don't listen to the lynch mob...


tailgater wrote:



That's it tail. Cling to ignorance.
tailgater
6 years ago

That's it tail. Cling to ignorance.

victor809 wrote:



Victor wants a hug.

opelmanta1900
6 years ago
I went to Sweden before and currently live in America's "Swedish Village" so by rule of proximity I'm pretty sure I get final say here...

I'm no fan of Angry Little Debbie, but my Svedish sources have confirmed that "to put someone's back on a wall" is the Swedish equivalent of our "nailing someone down" on something...

Just as the latter is not a reference to crucifixion, the former is not an allusion to assassination... So y'all gotta find another reason to dogpile on this poor little aspbergers child....

She recently slandered a German railway line, I'd start there...
victor809
6 years ago

I went to Sweden before and currently live in America's "Swedish Village" so by rule of proximity I'm pretty sure I get final say here...

I'm no fan of Angry Little Debbie, but my Svedish sources have confirmed that "to put someone's back on a wall" is the Swedish equivalent of our "nailing someone down" on something...

Just as the latter is not a reference to crucifixion, the former is not an allusion to assassination... So y'all gotta find another reason to dogpile on this poor little aspbergers child....

She recently slandered a German railway line, I'd start there...

opelmanta1900 wrote:



Sorry opel. You need to follow cbid proximity rules. CA is way too far from sweden for you to possibly be correct. I'm guessing a bostonian/ny'er or someone else like that will get the nod.

If you want to fly to sweden and re-post the statement from sweden (or hell, from england) you will probably beat them.
tailgater
6 years ago
I disagree with her message, but I admire the hell out of her.
delta1
6 years ago
she's only 16, tail...must be those pig-tails, huh?
tailgater
6 years ago
Not sure why you'd go there.
Did you misunderstand my words? Or are you trying for humor?
Don't bother explaining.





Users browsing this topic