Nancy called TRUMPS STATE OF THE UNION SPEACH...

"A MANIFESTO OF LIES"...

Mr. Jones wrote:

Odd.
That's what Pelosi's Botox doctor called her face.

tailgater wrote:

not a road map to peace?

frankj1 wrote:

Ouch, doesn’t that make you seek the throne more often?

Abrignac wrote:

Nancy called TRUMPS STATE OF THE UNION SPEACH...

"A MANIFESTO OF LIES"...

Mr. Jones wrote:

Nancy called TRUMPS STATE OF THE UNION SPEACH...

"A MANIFESTO OF LIES"...

Mr. Jones wrote:

This, coming from a festering woman of lies.

tailgater wrote:

Seriously?
Like... lie for lie she's not even in the same category.

victor809 wrote:

Can you point to a scientific, peer reviewed study to prove your hypothesis?



😝

Abrignac wrote:

No one does scientific studies on politician's lies. Yet. It may become a field of social sciences after this president, but we already know that the social sciences aren't really science. :)

There are websites that count presidential lies. I believe at this point he is averaging 32 false claims a day.
I don't think pelosi even makes 32 statements a day.

I suppose you could try to do it as a percentage of statements... but that would take a lot of records to go through

victor809 wrote:

Yet these lie counting websites are little more than propaganda poets, no matter the direction of bias. A quick look at the Washington Post tracker shows they label some as a lie then explain why it’s a lie by cherry picking the reasons against while excluding evidence which support his “lies”.

Abrignac wrote:

Even if you threw out 50% of the identified lies, you're still at 16 a day... for at this point 1113 days. That's 17,808 lies in just 3 years.

He's at a level no other politician in the US has ever achieved.

victor809 wrote:

I’m not saying he’s Abe Lincoln, but labeling something a lie based on opinionated evidence is weak sauce. In the past, I’ve looked at opinions by factcheck, politicfact(so?), Fox, ABC, both the Washington Post and Washing Times, Brietbart, Infowars, etc. blah-blah, blah and each one spins things to fit their own political agenda. In other words, it’s mostly propaganda.

Abrignac wrote: