RayR
5 years ago

ok...give me a silly answer...

delta1 wrote:



Wow! This progressive indoctrination is terrifying, that you can't imagine a world without progressivism?

Smooth light answered short and sweet but I'll risk the scorn of the Ministry of Truth here and quote the old dead French guy, Frederic Bastiat from 1850 at the conclusion of his essay The Law.

"Away, then, with quacks and organizers! Away with their rings, chains, hooks, and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with the whims of governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centralization, their tariffs, their government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulations, their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations!
And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end
where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works."
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

I'll take that as a YES then, that you believe we would all be in the stone age without progressivism.
Geez! The brainwashing techniques at the Progressive Ministry of Truth have been very effective on you.

RayR wrote:



With the way I'm interpretting your definition of progressive... then the answer is a resounding YES!!!!

If presented a binary choice of RayRay's non-progressive, vs the opposite of RayRay... which would you choose?...


I would choose not RayRay... interpret that how you will.

Bout to go buy a rainbow and put it on my gun case in the trunk of my 392 in celebration of becoming one with the what ever the name of that organization is that rayray keeps quoting... but if it's not rayray, then it must be good.... right?

Basically, rayray math looks like this...

Rayray = !progressive = hut + sh*tton(ammo * m/s^2)
RayR
5 years ago

With the way I'm interpretting your definition of progressive... then the answer is a resounding YES!!!!

If presented a binary choice of RayRay's non-progressive, vs the opposite of RayRay... which would you choose?...


I would choose not RayRay... interpret that how you will.

Bout to go buy a rainbow and put it on my gun case in the trunk of my 392 in celebration of becoming one with the what ever the name of that organization is that rayray keeps quoting... but if it's not rayray, then it must be good.... right?

Basically, rayray math looks like this...

Rayray = !progressive = hut + sh*tton(ammo m/s^2)

bgz wrote:



You need to interpret the definition of progressive, even after I've supplied you with all the information that you need to know in different threads? You are truly hopeless and the rest of what you attempted badly to convey is gibberish.
I'm sure you remember your indoctrination slogan, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength
It explains a lot about what rattles around between your ears.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

You need to interpret the definition of progressive, even after I've supplied you with all the information that you need to know in different threads?

RayR wrote:



EXACTLY!!!!

In fact, I gave the equation for it... although I did leave out a factor of two, but I didn't want to make it more complicated than it needed to be.

Oh, and it's a vector... can't forget to give you that piece of it.

Anyway, you've defined it well.
delta1
5 years ago

Wow! This progressive indoctrination is terrifying, that you can't imagine a world without progressivism?

Smooth light answered short and sweet but I'll risk the scorn of the Ministry of Truth here and quote the old dead French guy, Frederic Bastiat from 1850 at the conclusion of his essay The Law.

"Away, then, with quacks and organizers! Away with their rings, chains, hooks, and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with the whims of governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centralization, their tariffs, their government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulations, their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations!
And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end
where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works."

RayR wrote:




so loosely translated, we should be free of all regulations...liberty is freedom for each man to decide for himself...state of nature, then...

beware the many who covet your stuff, your wife or daughter


how the heck we gonna get people to Mars in a state of nature???
RayR
5 years ago

EXACTLY!!!!

In fact, I gave the equation for it... although I did leave out a factor of two, but I didn't want to make it more complicated than it needed to be.

Oh, and it's a vector... can't forget to give you that piece of it.

Anyway, you've defined it well.

bgz wrote:



The only equation a progressive uses in interpreting the political economy is 2+2=5
RayR
5 years ago

so loosely translated, we should be free of all regulations...liberty is freedom for each man to decide for himself...state of nature, then...

beware the many who covet your stuff, your wife or daughter


how the heck we gonna get people to Mars in a state of nature???

delta1 wrote:



Read the whole essay, maybe you'll figure it out. Then maybe not, its so anti-progressive.

You want to go to Mars? Then take up a collection. I know...that's so anti-progressive too.
HockeyDad
5 years ago



beware the many who covet your stuff, your wife or daughter

delta1 wrote:



I think that’s what the sh*tton(ammo m/s^2) is for.
Speyside
5 years ago
Ray Ray, how about 1=0?
HockeyDad
5 years ago
1 is the loneliest number.
tonygraz
5 years ago
I get the feeling RayRay is lonely. Life in the basement is tough, but the progress of moving above ground is terrifying.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

I think that’s what the sh*tton(ammo m/s^2) is for.

HockeyDad wrote:



See, I get it.
delta1
5 years ago
330 Million, about half might be desperate for your stuff...how much is a sh*tton
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

330 Million, about half might be desperate for your stuff...how much is a sh*tton

delta1 wrote:



It's just some scalar that is proportional to the size of rayrays income.
HockeyDad
5 years ago

330 Million, about half might be desperate for your stuff...how much is a sh*tton

delta1 wrote:



Sounds like it needs to be at least 165 million. Yikes.
RobertHively
2 years ago

Here's a couple on Chemtrails to get you started, I'm sure there's a lot more of both tinfoil and non-tinfoil research if you want to dig for it.

Old video of lady speaking to the UN about it:



https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aae98d 

Last paragraph:

"Moving from means to motive, while we hope to demonstrate here that no global SAI program could reasonably expect to maintain secrecy, we also consider who if anyone might wish to implement such a covert program. For one, SAI is global in effect, if not implementation (Keith 2000). SAI, thus, is not a precision weapon. Moreover, judged purely by commercial motives, it is difficult to see how one might utilize SAI solely for local gain without triggering substantial global spillovers, both negative and positive. While there might be a long list of contractors who would eagerly bid to vend hardware, supplies, and services to an SAI endeavor, and there might even be a role for patents along that supply chain (Reynolds et al 2017, 2018), we believe strongly that commercial profits must not be a motivating factor in any decisions about whether, when, where, and how to implement SAI. Any entity that intends to engineer the climate of the entire globe must act—and be seen to act—purely out of humanitarian and environmental considerations unclouded by aspirations of direct financial gain."


As for the moon, I completely believe they got there. I mean, what soup can with a BBQ attached to it wouldn't...?

RobertHively wrote:



Here you go, Frank. Stratospheric aerosol injection.

Ah the BGZ trolling days. Don't watch the video link I posted, bc "It's old..." said BGZ. Lol

Imagine what they spray in 2024. Could be a lot worse, or not. I wouldn't know.
RobertHively
2 years ago

Freedom, liberty and justice for all, makes everyone content. Now get out of my yard!❄️🍭🃏

Smooth light wrote:



Hey Frank do you know what happened to Smoothie? Did he pass away?

I remember he had something wrong... with his lungs?


P.S.

ESND!!!!
frankj1
2 years ago

Hey Frank do you know what happened to Smoothie? Did he pass away?

I remember he had something wrong... with his lungs?


P.S.

ESND!!!!

RobertHively wrote:


Sadly, I believe he did pass away...though I also believe he had prepared himself.

There was a thread in which he may have said or posted something antisemitic, possibly in error, and I latched on to it, pursued him like a hunting dog. We ended up discussing a few things "off camera" for which I am eternally grateful.

Can't say we came to a place where we lived in total harmony, but he seemed sincerely remorseful, it was plausible that he hit a Star of David in error or whatever caused the furor, and I had an opportunity to treat him with some level of forgiveness...which really is as important as being forgiven (part of how I look at the repentance of Yom Kippur, even without a supreme being involved).

A while later he stopped responding to pm's, and I think I knew he was gone.
frankj1
2 years ago
remind this old guy about ESND...so familiar but can't recapture it
frankj1
2 years ago

Here you go, Frank. Stratospheric aerosol injection.

Ah the BGZ trolling days. Don't watch the video link I posted, bc "It's old..." said BGZ. Lol

Imagine what they spray in 2024. Could be a lot worse, or not. I wouldn't know.

RobertHively wrote:


it's quite possible that post was the day I decided to like you...
Users browsing this topic