DrafterX
5 years ago
I think after Fauci goes to jail we need to set up a re-edumication camp for the Fauci followers... 😟
RayR
5 years ago
New Study Finds Mask Use Had 'Little to No' Association with the Spread of COVID, Contradicting CDC


By Brett Kershaw
June 3, 2021 at 3:53pm


A recent MedRxiv study found that mask mandates and the use of masks in the continental United States were “not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread” during the global outbreak of the coronavirus last year.

Measuring total coronavirus case growth and public mask use with data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the non-peer-reviewed study’s results ascertained that the growth rate of COVID-19 cases did not significantly vary between “mandate and non-mandate states.”

When exposed to higher transmission and spread, “surges were equivocal” across the separate states and “Ⓜask mandates and use” could not be “associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges,” the researchers noted.

“Our findings do not support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates decrease with greater public mask use,” they continued. According to the researchers, coronavirus “transmission waves are independent of reported mask use,” and do not associate with case growth.

“Case growth was independent of mandates at low and high rates of community spread, and mask use did not predict case growth during the Summer or Fall-Winter waves.”

https://www.westernjournal.com/new-study-finds-mask-use-little-no-association-spread-covid-contradicting-cdc/ 

drglnc
5 years ago
Lol, “after Fauci goes to jail”? Is he gonna share a cell with Hillary, Obama, and Biden after trump is reinstated this summer?
ZRX1200
5 years ago
It’s the logical next step in anti fascism. They’ve asked for it, it’s inevitable.

“They might as well sit back and enjoy it”
~ Bobby Knight
RayR
5 years ago

I think after Fauci goes to jail we need to set up a re-edumication camp for the Fauci followers... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Fauci – Public Enemy #1

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/fauci-public-enemy-1/ 

Fauxchi’s Fall

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/fauxchis-fall/ 
tonygraz
5 years ago

I think after Fauci goes to jail we need to set up a re-edumication camp for the Fauci followers... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


teedubbya
5 years ago
this is from wiki which of course is not a decent source, but since it is about another bogus source I thought I'd include it. It can be verified other ways if you choose. This seemed more appropriate to me.

medRxiv (pronounced "med-archive") is an Internet site distributing unpublished eprints about health sciences.[1][2][3][4] It distributes complete but unpublished manuscripts in the areas of medicine, clinical research, and related health sciences without charge to the reader. Such manuscripts have yet to undergo peer review and the site notes that preliminary status and that the manuscripts should not be considered for clinical application, nor relied upon for news reporting as established information.[5] Medical photographs cannot be included in preprints on medRxiv, since the editorial team does not have the resources of a journal to do thorough checks of patient consent.


I never read RayRs posts but was on mobile and did this time. Guess what his buddy Brett Kershaw used for his news reporting. You guessed it. They specifically say not to. I wonder if there is an agenda involved?

Ray... nice to meet you. I don't think I've ever responded to you directly before but I will this one time before going back to the full site. RayR, you are an idiot.

And so is anyone lining up next to his stupidity.
teedubbya
5 years ago
Check out their front page in red letters. Then go find the "study" and actually read it rather than what this hack cherry picks.

LOL every article has the following language at the top "bioRxiv (or medrxiv) posts many COVID19-related papers. A reminder: they have not been formally peer-reviewed and should not guide health-related behavior or be reported in the press as conclusive."

https://www.medrxiv.org/ 



Interestingly enough there is a study about CD4+/CD8+ ratios in there I hope goes through peer review and proves meaningful. It isn't right now. No matter what Laura Ingram says. Now excuse me while I go by stock in hydroxy.
tonygraz
5 years ago
I never doubted Ben when he first called rayray an idiot, and never will. I still think he works for the russians.
DrafterX
5 years ago
But the emails... 😟
teedubbya
5 years ago
And the server
teedubbya
5 years ago
But enough about Hillary
Speyside
5 years ago
Imagine having that much Denisovan DNA as well as being your own Grandfather. His whole life is a feuge. He is the proverbial blind squirrel, except he found Drafters nuts.

I must admit hearing folks like him is encouraging. We don't have to push real hard for the elephant to tumble over the cliff. He prolly got his degree at Dewey, Screwem, and Howe. Formerly known as Trump University.

Oh hell, I'm rambling again.
Smooth light
5 years ago
Where you the one born on the backseat of a bus, rolling down highway 41..."Rambling Man"
ZRX1200
5 years ago
Yeah I’m sure the reason given for redaction is well know by you Teedubya?
teedubbya
5 years ago

Yeah I’m sure the reason given for redaction is well know by you Teedubya?

ZRX1200 wrote:




Not really. Not sure why I would know since I’m not directly involved. I have worked on foia requests and redactions. There are lots of legitimate reasons *shrug*.
ZRX1200
5 years ago
Oh sorry I thought since you had such strong opinionated responses you’d know what’s been reported.....

My bad
teedubbya
5 years ago
Never claimed to. I guess you assumed wrong or made it up in your head? I honestly don’t know what you are talking about.
teedubbya
5 years ago
Have t been paying much attention to the emails or the fever dream to smear Fauci that’s been underway for some time to be honest. It’s so transparent.

Just read this though to try to catch up just for fun even though I think it’s all nonsense.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/06/what-the-fauci-emails-reveal/ 

‘ In any case, like most data dumps that have careful redactions, the Fauci email trove has no smoking-gun evidence of wrongdoing. You could make the case, as I and others have, that Fauci had certain prejudices and dispositions that were deeply unhelpful in his leadership of the pandemic response — and you’ll find evidence of those here. He had a very strong bias against existing drugs and for new and experimental ones. He has been slippery on masks and clearly was willing to say things in public that he thought “helped” the response even if they weren’t strictly true.“

*shrug*. Ok. Fauci bad?
BuckyB93
5 years ago
Wait, I thought you lived and breathed this stuff every day. It's not a hobby. It's been your focus since the beginning. You're in tune with information that nobody else has exposure to. You model a bunch of stuff to direct and provide feedback to the community. Been on conference calls and meetings of some of the biggest experts in the field...

...but now your not directly involved nor up to date on current happenings?

(You missed a nine!)
Users browsing this topic