By Jim Hoft
Published June 26, 2021 at 8:51am

Earlier this week the CDC admitted to finding more cases of rare heart inflammation in young adults than was expected after receiving COVID vaccine shots.

The Wednesday CDC presentation shows a surge in myocarditis/pericarditis cases in young adults after their second dose of the COVID vaccine.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/not-making-headlines-cdc-officials-admit-hospitalizations-young-people-vaccine-actual-covid-virus-including-huge-number-heart-problems-reported/ 

written by adam ******
wednesday june 23, 2021

On Monday, I wrote about the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending at its website that children not be given experimental coronavirus vaccine shots, a position I noted is diametrically opposed to that of national, state, and local governments in America that are putting out much effort to give the shots to as many children — ages 12 and up so far — as possible. The next day, the WHO website section dealing with experimental coronavirus vaccine shots for children was extensively revised.

The new language at the WHO website is still far from the “jump on in, the water is fine” message that governments, and some big companies, are promoting in America. Yet, the new language does provide some accommodation for giving experimental coronavirus vaccine shots to children, unlike the language at the WHO website the day before.

More...

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2021/june/23/was-it-something-i-said-the-who-backtracks-on-its-advice-children-not-be-given-experimental-coronavirus-vaccine-shots-the-day-after-i-wrote-about-the-advice/ 

Refresher

The first is the identification of conspiracies.
The second is the use of fake experts.
The third characteristic is selectivity, drawing on isolated papers (or statistics) that challenge the dominant consensus or highlighting the flaws in the weakest papers among those that support it as a means of discrediting the entire field. This could include use of normal disclaimers to void entire papers.
The fourth is the creation of impossible expectations of what research can deliver. (I sometimes call this the wrong question) (in this instance mischaracterizing mRNA research timelines and ignoring things like polio vaccine development timelines and practices relevant to the specific tech being used.)
The fifth is the use of misrepresentation and logical fallacies.


Do we see any of this happening in this thread?

teedubbya wrote:

Run a checklist on all the unions that have told them to pound sand over the mandate.

Staggering.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Wonder how many Trumptards work for unions then b*tch about unions all while praising Q and the big orange savior...

bgz wrote:

The answer you seek is zero. Kinda like your IQ and yes, I'll take fries with that order.

HockeyDad wrote:

The answer you seek is zero. You’re welcome.

HockeyDad wrote: