Mike3316
4 years ago

No, no. That was Trump's bullchit slogan. Biden's bullchit slogan was Build back better

Sunoverbeach wrote:


Didnt' Pepermint Patty say that they were rebranding Build Back Better?
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago
Yeah, it's called Biden's **** Administration and fucktards will vote for it.
View All Posts by User
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
Some things you may want to stay away from while drinking heavily. Ebay, not a good idea. Ebay and alcoholism, perfect storm of addiction. You'll find yourself up to your ass in George Foreman grills and Sham Wows.
- RW
View All Posts by User
Mike3316
4 years ago

Yeah, it's called Biden's **** Administration and fucktards will vote for it.

DrMaddVibe wrote:


Sounds about right. Lol
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago
Ran across this "gem" today while reading another story.

I bet it's still going on.


Biden's Gen Z translators



Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. With help from Allie Bice.

It started during the campaign.

If JOE BIDEN’s aides wanted to get the greenlight on a social media project, the most surefire way was to go to Biden’s 20-something granddaughters, who have become his go-to digital validators.

If NAOMI or FINNEGAN BIDEN saw a video or liked a post and told Biden about it, it was just as valuable, if not more, than any amount of data proving its effectiveness, according to Democrats familiar with the dynamic. The digital team was sometimes given directives based on what Biden’s granddaughters were suggesting.

Naomi and Finnegan have maintained that informal role in the new administration, encouraging the president to go beyond his normal media go-to’s like New York Times columnists, local television stations, and network and cable news anchors.

“Anything digital he does is purely because his granddaughters tell him to,” said a Democrat familiar with the dynamic.

A White House official was less definitive but acknowledged the influence of the Gen Z Bidens on their 78-year-old grandfather. “The President talks to his grandkids all the time, and of course he looks for their advice and input on how to reach young Americans and connect with people online,” the official said. (In addition to Naomi and Finnegan, Biden’s grandchildren include MAISY, a college student; NATALIE and HUNTER, who are in their teens; and baby BEAU.)

Naomi and Finnegan’s influence is seen in the fact that as both a candidate and as president, Biden has been game to try out at least some new things, although digital strategists still wish he’d do more. He has participated in videos with influencers like the beauty-focused “Manny MUA” and today he met with pop star OLIVIA RODRIGO. In both cases, Biden was encouraging young people to get vaccinated and the influencers promoted the message on their own channels.

Naomi, Biden’s oldest grandchild, became an internet surrogate of sorts for him during the campaign, participating in video conversations with influencers like CAZZIE DAVID, the daughter of comedian LARRY DAVID, who has nearly half a million Instagram followers.

She told David that she has often shown her grandfather internet memes of himself. “He literally thinks they’re the funniest thing ever. He’s obsessed with them, will ask me to show him more,” Naomi said.

Now in the White House, Biden has agreed to deputy chief of staff JEN O’MALLEY DILLON’s push to set aside about 15 minutes each week for the digital team to make content, according to a senior White House official (it’s not always the same day but he makes the time, they said).

O’Malley Dillon and adviser ANITA DUNN have been the biggest internal supporters of ROB FLAHERTY, who ran digital on the campaign and now heads the White House office of digital strategy. Flaherty has been a big proponent of putting Biden on alternative platforms and mediums. Some Democrats close to the White House worry that the digital team will have less influence once Dunn leaves, which she has said will happen soon.

That’s in part because the Biden team largely has a more old school mentality when it comes to media.

For example, many in Biden’s orbit see local news as a not necessarily sexy but ultimately critically important form of media outreach that too many politicians dismiss. That has at times put them at odds with some of the more digitally-inclined strategists. And it was part of the reason that Biden outspent DONALD TRUMP on television by well over $100 million as Trump still outspent Biden online.

That campaign dynamic is also seen in the White House. The easiest interview request to get approved is one for local TV, according to Democrats familiar with the process. The White House declined to say how many local TV interviews administration officials have done, but it is an enormous focus of the Biden White House, just as it was during the campaign.

Flaherty’s team of roughly twenty people is about the same size or just a smidge bigger than the digital team at the end of the Obama administration in 2016, when digital was still a relatively new component of political comms. There have been bumps too, with one of Flaherty’s original team members quietly leaving the White House earlier this year.

Many Democrats close to the White House think the team should be far larger given how much more powerful social media has become in the past five years. They also point out that JEFFREY ZIENTS’ Covid-19 team has only one digital person, CLARKE HUMPHREY, at a time when the White House is struggling to convince many young, digital-first Americans to get vaccinated.

Still, past White House digital officials think Flaherty and his team are being innovative. “More [staff] is always good. But I wrote a thing during the campaign about how the owned and operated channels (wh IG, Twitter) will consume as many bodies as you can ever throw at it,” JASON GOLDMAN, who had Flaherty’s job at the end of the Obama administration, wrote in a direct message on Twitter.

“This is harder work in part because it moves at a different cadence than the rest of the building,” Goldman added. “But it appears they’ve figured out a way to do that which frankly was something I struggled with.”

Do you work in the Biden administration? Are you in touch with the White House? Are you CAITLIN JARVIS?

We want to hear from you — and we’ll keep you anonymous: [email protected]. Or if you want to stay really anonymous send us a tip through SecureDrop, Signal, Telegram, or Whatsapp here.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook/2021/07/14/bidens-gen-z-translators-493580 


#LETSGOBRANDON
#FJB
#FJB&FYFVFH
View All Posts by User
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
A woman would never make a nuclear bomb. They wouldn't make a weapon that kills. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel bad for a while
- RW
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago



Biden Poised To Remove Iran's IRGC From Terror List To Wrap Up Nuke Deal



At a moment a restored JCPOA Iran nuclear deal is said to be nearing the finish line, despite recent complications involving Russia's demand of written guarantees that Ukraine-related sanctions won't hinder its trade with the Islamic Republic, the White House is poised to remove Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from the official terrorist.

Biden's potentially reversing Trump's 2019 designation of the elite Iranian military group as a Foreign Terrorist Organization is being seen as a final huge concession toward Tehran, with the immediate effect of providing energy markets relief as additional oil supplies are badly needed for Europe.

Axios' Barak Ravid reports Wednesday that "The Biden administration is considering removing Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from a terror blacklist in return for a public commitment from Iran to de-escalation in the region, three Israeli officials and two U.S. sources tell me."

The same report said that Iranian leaders consider the IRGC's removal from the FTO to be a key final sticking point if a restored deal is to succeed in Vienna.

If it happens, Biden would likely come under bipartisan attack and pressure from Iran hawks - no doubt with Republicans leading the way, however. Israel too is firmly against any change in the current designation as it sees the IRGC as it's number one enemy. The past years of almost weekly Israel airstrikes on Syria are typically explained as targeting IRGC assets in Syria.

Tel Aviv has also long condemned the IRGC's links to Hezbollah - as the two have a weapons supply relationship, and in some cases it's believed IRGC operatives are on the ground training Hezbollah forces in Lebanon. The Shia military groups have also closely coordinated throughout a decade of the Syria war.

According to Axios, the Israelis are especially concerned about any plan to de-designate the IRGC as any "promises" of de-escalation would be so vague as to be moot. Per the Wednesday report:

One idea being discussed by the Biden administration would be a public announcement that the U.S. reserves the right to redesignate the IRGC if it determines that Iran did not follow through on its pledge to de-escalate in the region.
The Israeli officials say the Biden administration briefed the Israeli government that such possibilities are being considered but stressed that no decisions have been made.
The Israeli government is concerned about the idea, and in particular, the fact that the U.S. didn't demand specific commitments from Iran not to target the U.S. and its allies in the region, two senior Israeli officials tell me.

Upon the report hitting Wednesday afternoon, it generated immediate outrage among some Western pundits, despite all eyes being on the Ukraine crisis...

The State Department, meanwhile, when asked to comment on the development rejected reports of impending plans to remove the IRGC from the FTO as "speculation".

The Iranians see the IRGC as a legitimate and integral part of the country's main military branches, while over the past three years Washington has seen it as an initiator of terror plots abroad, and as a main way that Tehran has helped to prop up Assad in Syria, despite American-Gulf sponsored regime change efforts.


https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/biden-mulls-removing-irans-irgc-terror-list-push-nuke-deal-through 

Git on yer minibike and ride King Bidas. Start another military conflict in another part of the world with your pathetic leadership and mumbling. Meanwhile in Tehran...




This is what leadership looks like...



Now, he was more right than ever.
View All Posts by User
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
When you look at Prince Charles, don't you think that someone in the Royal family knew someone in the Royal family?
- RW
View All Posts by User
frankj1
4 years ago

When you look at Prince Charles, don't you think that someone in the Royal family knew someone in the Alfred E. Newman family?
- F Tripod

Sunoverbeach wrote:


View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago




While You Weren't Paying Attention, The Hunter Biden Laptop Story Turned Out To Be True & No One Has Been Held Accountable


It turns out that the party who spent four years accusing President Trump of Russian collusion performed a massive cover-up for Joe and Hunter Biden heading into the 2020 election that they have yet to be held accountable for.

This mainstream media dishonesty has become so common, it is part of why I was insistent that the mainstream media is losing the fight of its life earlier this year.

The media's predictability is becoming so blatant that it was easy to figure out that Covid would be a non-issue in 2022 and that we would experience what I called "The Great Covid Pivot Of 2022".

And now we're backtracking on what turned out to be more false claims of Russian collusion. Go figure.

I remember speaking to my father around the time of the election about the Hunter Biden laptop story, where presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son’s laptop was found to contain proof that the former Biden sold his influence to China while his father, the latter Biden, was Vice President of the United States.

And in the midst of an ongoing media cover up of that story, I also remember talking to my father about former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski coming forward and blowing the whistle on the Bidens in an effort to get the public to take notice.

Instead, Bobulinski was only given airtime by Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and was otherwise shunned and ignored by the rest of the left-leaning media.
Source: Fox News

We both had watched Bobulinski’s interview and found him to be extremely credible.

I remember my father saying that the censorship of the story and the story itself could, combined, be the biggest political scandal of all time. This caught me by surprise because my father, who has voted both Democrat and Republican over the last handful of elections, has lived through quite a few scandals.

But now I understand what he was getting at. Selling your influence to China while running for President is a big deal. The media covering up that story completely in the United States in the midst of the election? An even bigger deal.
Source: NBC News

Because when you step back and objectively examine the issue of Joe Biden’s business dealings in China, it appeared that he was actually engaged in the types of conflict of interest that his party spent four years accusing President Trump of. Again, go figure.

And then there was the laptop. After the New York Post broke what should have been a Pulitzer worthy story that Biden’s son had a laptop filled with incriminating evidence (in addition to ****** pics taken while smoking crack with hookers), the story was promptly blackballed in the mainstream media and was talked about nowhere other than conservative news outlets.

In fact, the mainstream media didn’t even give the story one shred of an objective chance. Half of the liberal media organizations covered the story as Russian disinformation, while the others didn’t carry it at all.

Here’s what coverage at the time looked like:

The story was literally laughed off of TV and television as some kind of conspiracy theory.

Even social media companies were censoring posts about the issue, despite being reported as national news by the New York Post.
Source: NPR

And then a funny thing happened when the nation didn’t have access to what would turn out to be highly credible information: Joe Biden got elected president and, several months later, Politico reported that some parts of the laptop, including emails at the “center” of the controversy, were credible - a far cry from writing off the laptop as Russian disinformation.
Source: Politico

In March 2022, the New York Times also admitted that the laptop story was authentic.

Casually linking back to its October 2020 story casting doubt on the laptop, in a new, 2022 story about the Justice Department’s ongoing inquiry into Hunter Biden, the New York Times wrote:

People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity. Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.

For a party that is always crowing about transparency and democracy - and a party that constantly labored on about the importance of freedom of press during the entire Trump administration - the liberal media did an abhorrent job of missing what would have objectively been an earth shattering story ahead of a presidential election.

And that tells you everything you need to know about the journalistic integrity of large media outlets in this country right now. As my mom would rightfully say, “Every station has an agenda - the left-wing ones and the right wing ones.”

But perhaps this “agenda” could have just meant that MSNBC or CNN actually covering the laptop story with a bit more of a favorable spin for Biden; it shouldn’t mean totally ignoring the story ahead of an election and pretending like the events in question simply never happened, right?

The worst part is this type of behavior from media isn’t just this one story. We’re seeing all types of narratives being protected and facts being ignored when it comes to the pandemic. For instance, look at what an absolutely bat**** crazy job the hysterical media did covering ivermectin after Joe Rogan got Covid. People were banned from social media and scorned for suggesting the virus may have come from a lab. Now, it’s the media’s leading hypothesis. Would anyone be surprised to see a pivot on ivermectin now? I wouldn't.

The point is that the laptop story was objectively a material story, no matter what party you belong to. At some point, one would hope that the story’s merits would move the needle far enough that even left-wing news organizations would have given it perfunctory coverage.

Instead, they did something nefarious: they covered it up.

And while anybody with common sense at the time would’ve told you that the laptop story was likely true (who is going to fake 200 photos of a presidential candidate’s son smoking meth in his underwear?), admitting it now after the fact, as the President’s son parades around selling his “art” for $500,000 a clip, is both insulting to our intelligence and embarrassing for your respective news organizations.

Finally, remember every time the left tries to lecture you on the importance of journalism and accountability, maybe you can kindly ask them to start by examining the organizations who were never held accountable for ignoring what my dad rightfully referred to as “one of the biggest political scandals of all time”.

It’s a great time for the media that spent four straight years focused on pointing the finger at former President Trump for anything and everything to realize that three more fingers are pointing back at them.

Like many on the left, they’ve become what they claim to hate.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/while-you-werent-paying-attention-hunter-biden-laptop-story-turned-out-be-true-zero-media 

Where are the scales of Justice now?
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago
We all knew Joe is an avowed racist. Who knew he despised the Jewish people and Israel?

Biden Blames the Jews for His Ukraine Policy -
The president and his people try to seal a new Iran deal by hanging their appeasement of Putin on Israel


Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine was precipitated by assurances from China, Germany, and the United States that each of Russia’s major trading partners either backed his position or had zero interest in getting in his way. President Joe Biden’s invitations to Putin to bite off more chunks of Ukraine made it clear that America was not interested in a fight with the Russian dictator in his own backyard. Surely, the mighty Putin would make quick work of the Ukrainians. After all, he helped put down the Syrian rebellion to preserve Iran’s stake in Syria, and thereby sealed Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with the clerical regime in Tehran. So why make a big fuss, especially since at the same time Putin is intent on breaking Ukraine, he is also brokering the new Iran deal with U.S. negotiators in Vienna?

The problem for Biden is that Putin is not winning his war in anything like the quick and easy fashion that the White House and other world powers apparently expected. Moreover, the prospect of a dictator murdering thousands of Ukrainians in Europe in a prolonged war may be a tougher pill to swallow for so-called Western elites than the same dictator helping to murder half a million Syrians.

Biden’s position has thus become difficult, even with a captive media eager to read from a script in which the president of the United States bravely rallies NATO to do something, while in fact doing as close to nothing as politically possible. Luckily, the White House has a playbook for situations in which the contradictions between appearance and reality threaten to overwhelm the ever-changing storylines about who is responsible for, say, $6 per gallon gas. The playbook, like the Iran deal, is a legacy of the Obama administration, and a variation on an age-old incantation: “Blame the Jews.”

In the case of Ukraine, blaming the Jews might seem like a stretch—the Jewish state is a regional power in a region far from Ukraine. But senior Capitol Hill sources told Tablet that the Biden administration is trying to put Israel in the line of fire by pushing Jerusalem to mediate between Kyiv and Moscow. The point is to position Israel to catch the blame if Putin doesn’t relent, or the stubborn Ukrainians prove unwilling to surrender enough territory to end the war on terms that the Russian president finds acceptable.

Sources explain that the Israelis have reluctantly relayed messages between the two states but don’t want to get further involved, for two reasons: First, with Russian forces on their Syrian border, the Israelis don’t want trouble with Putin; second, they see that the White House is setting them up for failure by forcing them into taking a stand against Putin.

Team Biden’s PR offensive blaming Israel for the failure of two-faced U.S. policy has included Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland’s warnings to Jerusalem not to help hide “dirty money” belonging to Putin-allied oligarchs. Nuland also said that Israel should join the international sanctions regime targeting Russian assets—a regime that notably does not include world powers like China and India, which Nuland failed to mention.

The administration’s misdirection campaign also relied on Biden validators from the foreign policy establishment. Richard Haass and Aaron David Miller tweeted to the effect that if Israel wants to be an American ally, it should stand with America’s values, embodied by its moral stance toward Russia, which includes impoverishing ordinary Russians by crashing the ruble.

The coordinated operation to embroil Israel culminated in a story last week pushed out by the White House’s communications infrastructure inside Israel, whose lead publicist, Axios reporter Barak Ravid, proved his value during the Obama years. The story, which quickly went global, claimed that Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to accept Putin’s terms of surrender. A “senior Ukrainian official claimed Bennett initiated the call,” according to an account sourced to an anonymous Ukrainian official and given to Ravid. The source claimed that Bennett “recommended Zelensky take the offer.”

Was the story true? The Ukrainian government said it was false, and moved to correct the record the next day. Zelensky adviser Mikhail Podolyak wrote on Twitter that Israel did not push the Ukrainians to accept the concessions Putin demanded to end the invasion. Zelensky’s adviser tweeted that Bennett, “just as other conditional intermediary countries, does NOT offer Ukraine to agree to any demands of the Russian Federation.” Instead, he wrote, “Israel urges Russia to assess the events more adequately.” He also pointed out that the source could not have been on the call, which was private, and was probably not in Ukraine.

But whether the surrender story is true or not, shouldn’t the Israelis be openly and proudly pro-Zelensky? Ukraine’s president has won the affection of decent—and smart—people the world over, who have festooned their Facebook pages and Twitter feeds with the blue and yellow Ukrainian flag. And he’s Jewish! Why doesn’t Israel join in?

The reality is that Israel has frequently stood up for Ukraine against Russia, and with little to show for it. But the issue in this case is simple: The Russian military is on Israel’s border, kind of like it was on Ukraine’s border before it invaded. The difference is that the Russian-Ukrainian border is a geographical fact. Russia is only on Israel’s border due to a geostrategic power play that Moscow implemented with the acquiescence of the U.S. political faction now trying to drive Israel toward conflict with Putin.

The purpose of the Biden team’s anti-Israel smear campaign is not just to make the Israelis look like they sympathize with a tyrant while offering to hide the blood money of their Russian co-religionists. That part is just ugly propaganda. The strategic purpose of the administration’s campaign is to force Jerusalem into an error that would give Putin reason to move against Israel, and thereby further limit its ability to strike Iran or its allies. As with Obama, Biden’s moves against Israel are keyed to the Iran deal.

Despite some occasional public vows of affection for Israel, Obama’s performative progressives, who staff nearly every important position in the Biden administration, do not see it as an ally. Insofar as Israel jeopardizes the Iran deal, it is a U.S. adversary. Russia, on the other hand, is an important partner in getting the deal across the finish line.

Putin supplied the deterrence that protected the only foreign policy goal that really mattered to Obama. With Putin in Syria, Israel could only go so far.

The hypocrisy, gaslighting, and attempt to blame Israel for Russian depredations started more than a decade ago with the onset of the Syrian war. Putin stood behind Moscow’s Cold War-era ally and its only remaining regional partner, the regime Bashar Assad inherited from his father, Hafez. The Russians armed the Syrian government and represented it in international forums like the United Nations, where they regularly blocked action against Assad. When Obama’s U.N. Ambassadors Susan Rice and Samantha Power complained about the Russians’ immoral support for Assad, their shrill protests appeared designed to underscore American impotence. In fact, it disguised the disturbing reality that Obama was on the Russians’ side.

That’s because by defending Assad, Moscow was also defending the nuclear deal with Assad’s other patron, Iran. Instead of owning up to a policy that put the United States on the side of tyrants in Moscow, Damascus, and Tehran, the Obama team claimed that the fault lay with its regional allies, especially Israel, which was said to be pleading to keep the Russian-backed strongman in power. The idea then, as now, was to make the Israelis take the blame for what was in fact the American position: supporting despotic and anti-American regimes.

Israel’s then-ambassador to the United States Michael Oren repeatedly tried to correct the record. “I must once again state,” Oren wrote in 2011, “that Israel wants the Assad regime to be replaced by a genuine Syrian democracy that eschews terror, turns its back on Iran, and seeks peace with its Israeli neighbor.” But it didn’t matter how many times Jerusalem explained its actual position. Israel’s alliance with the United States prevented it from blaming the Americans, which meant that the Americans were free to act in bad faith and blame Israel.

Even with Moscow supporting Assad’s war on their border, the Israelis stood publicly with Ukraine. Shortly after Putin’s 2014 annexation of Crimea, Israel voted at the U.N. in defense of Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Soon, Russian forces would move toward Israel’s border with its 2015 escalation in Syria, a move celebrated at the time by U.S. officials but in no way welcomed by the Israelis.

In public, Obama’s aides claimed Russia would help rid the world of ISIS and other terror groups, but that’s not why Putin dispatched his forces at the request of Iranian terror commander Qassem Soleimani. The Russians were there to support Iran. And that’s what Obama wanted, too. What was the point, after all, of legalizing Iran’s industrial-scale nuclear program, if the Iranian regime was going to lose its war in Syria? Iran had to win, which meant Putin had to help. The government of then-Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu understood that for the first time in half a century, Jerusalem would not have Washington’s support if it wound up in a shooting war with Moscow.

Accordingly, the Israelis worked out a modus vivendi with Putin, a “deconfliction” mechanism by which Israel was permitted in certain circumstances to attack Syrian and Iranian forces, including Hezbollah. But should the Israelis get it into their heads to conduct air strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities, they’d have hell to pay on their border. Putin supplied the deterrence that protected the only foreign policy goal that really mattered to Obama. With Putin in Syria, Israel could only go so far.

Yet even then, in December 2016, Israel again took Kyiv’s side at the U.N. in a vote on the human rights situation in Crimea.

How did Vice President Biden show his appreciation for Israel’s principled stance against Putin’s war in Europe? Less than a week later, he strong-armed the Ukrainian president to vote for Security Council Resolution 2334, finding that Israel was in occupation of Palestinian land—which according to the resolution included historical Jewish holy sites. The Ukrainians asked to abstain, but Biden said no. Kyiv then asked for a delay. There was a large and influential Jewish community in Ukraine with family ties to Israel. And after all, what would the optics be of turning against Jerusalem just days after the Israelis had stood with Ukraine? That was not good enough for Biden. So the Ukrainians joined the other powers the Obama team had corralled into voting against Israel.

The Biden administration’s moves against Israel over Ukraine are part of a ghoulish puppet show. Yes, the administration will sanction the Russian economy until it bleeds—at the same time that the nuclear deal with Iran gives Russia a cash-rich client eager to buy Russian arms. And why not? From the perspective of the Obama-Biden faction, Russia is hardly the main problem. That distinction is reserved for Israel.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/biden-blames-jews-ukraine-policy 

See them for not only who they are, but what they do.

The DNC is a terrorist organization.
View All Posts by User
RayR
4 years ago
Did Biden blame the Jews for high gas prices too? He's blamed everybody else.
View All Posts by User
Stogie1020
4 years ago
DMV, that's a very interesting perspective. Thx for posting the article.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago
Lolz...

Which one???

[frypan]
View All Posts by User
Stogie1020
4 years ago
Sorry, the most recent one, #751.
View All Posts by User
Krazeehorse
4 years ago
Heard an interesting theory today. Hunter will be indicted and convicted. Joe pardons him then eventually resigns so they can install camel toe. Seems plausible, up to the part where he resigns anyway.
View All Posts by User
DrafterX
4 years ago
Joe Biden should be impeached..😠
View All Posts by User
RayR
4 years ago
+1

Impeachment is forever"
View All Posts by User
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
Did you ever spell a word so bad that your spell check has absolutely no clue what you’re trying to spell? What do you end up getting, you end up getting, like, a question mark? You got a million dollars of technology just looking back at you like, "You got me, buddy.’ Which is pretty amazing because I have all the words."
- BB
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago

Heard an interesting theory today. Hunter will be indicted and convicted. Joe pardons him then eventually resigns so they can install camel toe. Seems plausible, up to the part where he resigns anyway.

Krazeehorse wrote:



Yeah, I don't see Pedo Joe handing Kameltoes over to the puppet masters.
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com