Well, it is a two party system. Since you are always talking smack about Biden - without ever making a real point about an issue - people just assume you are smoking some Donald Deek.

Now, what policy points do disagree with Biden on?

Brewha wrote:

Ok, why is it about building clean energy and limiting emissions that you disagree with?

Brewha wrote:

Maybe because to us that think, it's ultimately not about clean energy and limiting emissions. But of course, you wouldn't know that Brew. [frypan]

RayR wrote:

Forgetting about the psychopaths trying to profit off the sh*t, why do you think it's a bad thing to care about the environment?

I mean, it's not a bad thing to care right?

Or in your mind is it?

bgz wrote:

Ok, why is it about building clean energy and limiting emissions that you disagree with?

Brewha wrote:

Clean as in solar or wind? The supply is just not enough for demand. Nuclear power is the way to go. You want to limit emissions? Build nuke plants. 70% of France's power is nuclear.

Kookifornia decommissioned 3 of their nuke plants and power is expensive as hell there, now. Second to Hawaii.

MACS wrote:

Engineering assessments of wind and solar aside, you do agree with his clean energy policies?

Brewha wrote:

I’m an engineer macs.
A Principal Engeering in fact, practicing since 1986. I do systems mechanical in the logistics field.


But the point is that you do agree with Biden that clean energy is good policy - yes?

Brewha wrote: