not sure how all this works, but do AI word products include footnotes and bibliography? those were required back in the day, and, I suppose, were a means to determine the legitimacy of your paper/research...

I like the idea though. Straight up representation, letter of the law. Gets a bit trickier with sentencing. I could see this really happening. Way to kill off an entire business sector Robert!

[/quote]

Huh???

Now that Kamala is the Czar of AI, she'll insist robot lawyers are trained to only talk in Word Salad, more than they do now.

AI doesn't kill people. People kill people.

I identify as a breakfast pastry. Usually strawberry. Sometime blueberry. When I feel like an Apricot danish, I feel sad. How should I not dress in the morning?

ChatGPT

Identifying as a breakfast pastry is an interesting and unique way to express oneself, but it's important to remember that personal identity and expression go beyond literal interpretations. It's also essential to prioritize mental and emotional well-being.

Regarding how you dress in the morning, it ultimately depends on your personal style, comfort, and individual preferences. The key is to choose clothing that makes you feel confident and comfortable. If you feel sad when dressing as an apricot danish, it might be worth exploring why that is the case. Understanding your emotions and addressing any underlying concerns can be helpful in promoting a positive mindset.

Remember, there are no specific rules or restrictions on how you should or shouldn't dress based on unconventional identities. It's important to be true to yourself and embrace what makes you feel happy and authentic. If you're experiencing persistent sadness or other emotional difficulties, it could be beneficial to seek support from a mental health professional who can provide guidance and assistance.

This reminds of wheel's post about blowing chucks all night. Also being Nood and curious!

So much for robot lawyers. 🤨

My son's law clerk job this summer includes him bringing AI experience into the firm.

Interestingly, the firm is in the early process of going national this summer using AI (and he is in on the ground floor!). He already fed all the facts and law into a trial closing argument and used the AI generated text to win a spot on the inter-scholastic trial team for U of Miami.

One of his tasks is to use AI for all of the firm's forms, documents and pleadings such that it pulls from different documents and paragraphs to create very close to what exactly what is needed for the first draft of letters and pleadings.

He is also going to be using AI to crawl through court sites all over the country to acquire all the information needed about the attorneys dealing with the sub-specialty of the new firm.

He also fed the firm's websites and marketing information into the AI to get like 200 marketing slogans specific to the firm!

This is the perfect job for hme because he will get great legal experience and get to use AI, which he started using/learning over a year ago. He was allowed to use it during his exams and got an A- in Constitutional Law, law school's most difficult course x 3!!! =d>

ChatGPT

The question of whether the chicken or the egg came first is an age-old philosophical conundrum. From a biological perspective, eggs existed long before chickens evolved. Eggs have been laid by various species of animals for millions of years, including reptiles, fish, and even some invertebrates. These eggs eventually gave rise to new generations of creatures through the process of reproduction.

In the context of chickens specifically, the question can be rephrased as: "Which came first, the first chicken or the first chicken egg?" Evolutionary biology provides an answer to this dilemma. Over time, through gradual changes and genetic mutations, a bird species that was not a chicken laid an egg with genetic material that, due to a mutation, led to the hatching of a creature that could be classified as the first chicken. Therefore, it can be concluded that the egg came first, as the first chicken would have hatched from an egg laid by a predecessor that was not yet a chicken.

In summary, while it may be a matter of perspective or interpretation, the egg came first in the context of the evolution of chickens.

At least this is settled.

If a not quite chicken laid a mutated chicken to be, how then will the now chicken mate with a nonexistent rooster to produce eventual eons of future chickens?

No possible definitive answer. Had to argue both sides and explain that it was basic a loop ponder that circles back on itself infinitely.

From Wikipedia:

'Chicken-and-egg' is a metaphoric adjective describing situations where it is not clear which of two events should be considered the cause and which should be considered the effect, to express a scenario of infinite regress, or to express the difficulty of sequencing actions where each seems to depend on others being done first."

University of Rochester economist Steve Landsburg joins Bob to discuss the abysmal performance of ChatGPT on his undergraduate exam. They also discuss the importance of market prices in guiding behavior and the unexpected problems with the government handing out "free" goodies.

https://rumble.com/v2uoz5n-why-chatgpt-failed-an-economics-exam.html 

Is that "In The Beginning" of Genesis?