Mr. Jones
2 years ago
THE FBI is a bunch of SICK MURDERING PRIIIICKS
RUNNING AMOK with zero repercussions to any law
Local, state or federal that they break...

The FBI IS ABOVE THE LAW...

PLAIN AND SIMPLE....


WHO YOU GONNA COMPLAIN TOO???

THINK ABOUT IT?

They are the last resort for any major complaint or grievance...local cops? Too corrupt and on the take..Forget it...the state police ( bunch of NAZI'S too) that answer to the FBI AND STATE POLITICIANS IN CHARGE...

YOU COMPLAIN???....YOU GET DEEMED MENTALLY INCOMPETENT AND LOSE ALL YOUR RIGHTS TO OWN FIREARMS...

WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT...

THEY WANT TO DISARM EVERY AMERICAN except for
6 shot revolvers, single shot rifles or bolt action rifles and double barrel shotguns...and those will require unbelievable circumstances and licensing fees in the thousands of dollars...
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
FBI Seizures From Safe Deposit Boxes Violated US Constitution: Federal Court



The FBI’s seizure of contents from safe deposit boxes during a raid on a Beverly Hills vault in 2021 violated the U.S. Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled on Jan. 23.

Agents raided U.S. Private Vaults, a business that allowed people to rent safe deposit boxes anonymously, based on the belief that criminals were using the service. The search warrant stated that agents could only open the boxes to inventory their contents and identify the owners for the return of their property.

However, agents brought drug-sniffing dogs and planned to set aside cash worth more than $5,000, with the intent to seize the money.

The FBI searched the contents of about 700 safe deposit boxes.

When people who rented boxes asked the FBI for their belongings back after the raid, the bureau refused, saying it was going to file for forfeiture or transfer ownership to the government. The renters of the boxes then sued.

A U.S. district judge previously ruled in favor of the government, finding the search was covered by what’s known as an inventory exception to the requirement for a warrant in the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

That exception, though, doesn’t apply to the raid on U.S. Private Vaults, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled.

The ruling hinged largely on how the exception requires searches to operate on standardized instructions and highlighted how the FBI, in the Beverly Hills raid, used supplemental, customized instructions.

“Once the government begins adding a set of ‘customized’ instructions to a ’standardized‘ inventory policy—particularly the type of custom instructions presented by this case—the entire search stops being conducted pursuant to a ’standardized’ policy,” U.S. Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. wrote in the ruling.

‘No Probable Cause’

During oral arguments, the appeals court panel compared the search to the “writs of assistance,” or unlimited searches executed by British authorities in pre-founding America.

“What you’ve got is a declaration or an understanding that from the beginning, the authorities intended to search all the boxes, all of them,” Judge Smith said at the time. “There was not probable cause available with respect to all of the boxes, but they did it anyway. Now, how do we distinguish that from what the colonists were upset about, and which led to the Fourth Amendment?”

In response, a government lawyer said the raid was “a unique situation” that involved “rampant illegal conduct.” U.S. Private Vaults has acknowledged in a plea agreement to recruiting criminals and conspiring to launder money.

“We note that it is particularly troubling that the government has failed to provide a limiting principle to how far a hypothetical ‘inventory search’ conducted pursuant to customized instructions can go,” Judge Smith said.

Many of the plaintiffs have already had their belongings returned by the FBI but pressed forward with the case for an opinion in their favor.

The ruling remanded the case back to U.S. District Judge Robert Klausner, who previously dismissed the case, for a ruling that directs the FBI to destroy records the bureau collected on the box renters who are members of the class-action case.

The opinion “draws a line in the sand, to ensure something like this never happens again,” Rob Johnson, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, which was representing the plaintiffs, said in a statement. “If this had come out the other way, the government could have exported this raid as a model across the country. Now, the government is on notice its actions violated the Fourth Amendment.”

“This is a good day for our country and the principle that the government’s power to search our property has limits,” added Jennifer Snitko, who was among the box renters.

The FBI didn’t respond to a request for comment.

‘Significant Privacy Interest’

A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles told news outlets that the office is “prepared to destroy records of the inventory search.”

The ruling also said the government went outside the authority outlined in the search warrant.

U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence Van**** concurred with the ruling in full, while U.S. Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea, agreeing that the search violated the Constitution, found the second finding regarding the warrant scope to be unnecessary.

Judges Smith, Bea, and Klausner were appointed by President George W. Bush. Judge Van**** was appointed by President Donald Trump.

Judge Smith also wrote a separate, concurring opinion that addressed the plaintiffs’ argument that the inventory exception, typically applied to automobiles, shouldn’t extend to stationary locations such as apartment buildings or safe deposit boxes.

“Plaintiffs do have a significant privacy interest in their safe deposit boxes, given that their conduct indicates they intended their items to be ‘preserved ... as private,’ and society generally views the privacy expectations of items in safe deposit boxes as reasonable,” Judge Smith wrote.

“Ultimately, given the greater privacy interests at stake and the implication of the rights of third parties,” he added, “I would hold that the inventory search doctrine does not extend to searches of box contents in a locked vault.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-seizures-safe-deposit-boxes-violated-us-constitution-federal-court 


Anyone want to talk about this at the tavern?
View All Posts by User
Abrignac
2 years ago
Having been through two complete blocks of instruction taught by a former FBI lawyer whose job was to write warrants for FBI field agents I found the inventory exception dubious. For example normally absent a warrant the only evidence a LEO can collect is what is in plain view or if not he must be given consent to search. Neither was the case here as one cannot see what is in a safe deposit box without opening it. The fact that the FBI was sued by the owners leads me to believe that did not have consent.

They’re another exceptions to the need for a warrant but they don’t fit into that scenario.

One of the methods we were taught was how to gain access to the contents of a vehicle trunk was to use the inventory exception by towing a vehicle. Suppose a person is pulled over and based reasons developed before or after that stop an officer has reason to believe contraband is concealed in the trunk. One way to access it is to tow the vehicle. However, as soon an officer assumes control of the vehicle he becomes responsible for every item in l it including the dirt in the trunk. So he needs to note all items and have the driver sign or refuse to sign a receipt. Doing so the officer conducts a through search and notates every item found. However, if the automobile can be released person designated by the driver they a limited to get the vehicle le prior to commence of arsenal.
View All Posts by User
Gene363
2 years ago

FBI Seizures From Safe Deposit Boxes Violated US Constitution: Federal Court



The FBI’s seizure of contents from safe deposit boxes during a raid on a Beverly Hills vault in 2021 violated the U.S. Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled on Jan. 23.

Agents raided U.S. Private Vaults, a business that allowed people to rent safe deposit boxes anonymously, based on the belief that criminals were using the service. The search warrant stated that agents could only open the boxes to inventory their contents and identify the owners for the return of their property.

However, agents brought drug-sniffing dogs and planned to set aside cash worth more than $5,000, with the intent to seize the money.

The FBI searched the contents of about 700 safe deposit boxes.

When people who rented boxes asked the FBI for their belongings back after the raid, the bureau refused, saying it was going to file for forfeiture or transfer ownership to the government. The renters of the boxes then sued.

A U.S. district judge previously ruled in favor of the government, finding the search was covered by what’s known as an inventory exception to the requirement for a warrant in the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

That exception, though, doesn’t apply to the raid on U.S. Private Vaults, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled.

The ruling hinged largely on how the exception requires searches to operate on standardized instructions and highlighted how the FBI, in the Beverly Hills raid, used supplemental, customized instructions.

“Once the government begins adding a set of ‘customized’ instructions to a ’standardized‘ inventory policy—particularly the type of custom instructions presented by this case—the entire search stops being conducted pursuant to a ’standardized’ policy,” U.S. Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. wrote in the ruling.

‘No Probable Cause’

During oral arguments, the appeals court panel compared the search to the “writs of assistance,” or unlimited searches executed by British authorities in pre-founding America.

“What you’ve got is a declaration or an understanding that from the beginning, the authorities intended to search all the boxes, all of them,” Judge Smith said at the time. “There was not probable cause available with respect to all of the boxes, but they did it anyway. Now, how do we distinguish that from what the colonists were upset about, and which led to the Fourth Amendment?”

In response, a government lawyer said the raid was “a unique situation” that involved “rampant illegal conduct.” U.S. Private Vaults has acknowledged in a plea agreement to recruiting criminals and conspiring to launder money.

“We note that it is particularly troubling that the government has failed to provide a limiting principle to how far a hypothetical ‘inventory search’ conducted pursuant to customized instructions can go,” Judge Smith said.

Many of the plaintiffs have already had their belongings returned by the FBI but pressed forward with the case for an opinion in their favor.

The ruling remanded the case back to U.S. District Judge Robert Klausner, who previously dismissed the case, for a ruling that directs the FBI to destroy records the bureau collected on the box renters who are members of the class-action case.

The opinion “draws a line in the sand, to ensure something like this never happens again,” Rob Johnson, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, which was representing the plaintiffs, said in a statement. “If this had come out the other way, the government could have exported this raid as a model across the country. Now, the government is on notice its actions violated the Fourth Amendment.”

“This is a good day for our country and the principle that the government’s power to search our property has limits,” added Jennifer Snitko, who was among the box renters.

The FBI didn’t respond to a request for comment.

‘Significant Privacy Interest’

A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles told news outlets that the office is “prepared to destroy records of the inventory search.”

The ruling also said the government went outside the authority outlined in the search warrant.

U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence Van**** concurred with the ruling in full, while U.S. Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea, agreeing that the search violated the Constitution, found the second finding regarding the warrant scope to be unnecessary.

Judges Smith, Bea, and Klausner were appointed by President George W. Bush. Judge Van**** was appointed by President Donald Trump.

Judge Smith also wrote a separate, concurring opinion that addressed the plaintiffs’ argument that the inventory exception, typically applied to automobiles, shouldn’t extend to stationary locations such as apartment buildings or safe deposit boxes.

“Plaintiffs do have a significant privacy interest in their safe deposit boxes, given that their conduct indicates they intended their items to be ‘preserved ... as private,’ and society generally views the privacy expectations of items in safe deposit boxes as reasonable,” Judge Smith wrote.

“Ultimately, given the greater privacy interests at stake and the implication of the rights of third parties,” he added, “I would hold that the inventory search doctrine does not extend to searches of box contents in a locked vault.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-seizures-safe-deposit-boxes-violated-us-constitution-federal-court 


Anyone want to talk about this at the tavern?

DrMaddVibe wrote:




The Justice institute took on the FBI.

http://www.cigarbid.com/Forum/c/posts/667964/Lawsuit-Attacks-FBIs-Anemic-Forfeiture-Notices 
The escape pod: https://cigarbid.freeforums.net 
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
The FBI must be wiped clean, or wiped out, on Day One of the next Repubican administration



Christopher Wray, the world's most powerful mobster

Should Donald Trump become president in 2024 and the acts to make major changes within the federal executive bureaucracy, cleaning house from top to bottom with major firings and layoffs (something he should have done in his first administration and failed to do), without question the first agency he must attack mercilessly is the FBI.

There are numerous documented examples in the past decade where the FBI has been weaponized against conservatives and Republicans, investigating, harassing, and even arresting people because they held beliefs that opposed the agenda of the Democratic Party. In some cases the individuals attacked were simply religious Christians who opposed abortion. In other cases the victims were ordinary Americans who simply made public their support of Trump.

Nor were just everyday Americans attacked. The FBI has arrested Republican candidates for office. Its officials have altered evidence to justify illegal seach warrants against Republicans. Its management also targeted and framed Trump officials it did not like. Officials there also abused the FISA court, submitting error-filled applications that were used to get warrants to spy on Americans. It redacted information to hide its misbehavior, claiming dishonestly that the redactions were for national security reasons.

This list is only a very small selection of the many such stories reported in the past decade. Any one of these corrupt actions would justify firing everyone at the FBI and zeroing out its budget as quickly as possible. Last week however the Ninth U.S. Court of Appeals provided us another reason: It ruled that FBI agents literally committed theft in rummaging through hundreds of security deposit boxes at a bank in wealthy Beverly Hills, confiscating millions of dollars it had no right to grab, simply because the cash was there and the agents and the agency wanted that money for their own pockets.

The decision slammed the FBI for overstepping its authority when it opened up hundreds of renters’ boxes, conducted criminal searches of them all, and attempted to permanently keep everything in the boxes worth more than $5,000, all without charging any box renter with a crime.

…For years, the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) insisted that they did nothing wrong at US Private Vaults. Even though the warrant authorizing the raid only permitted the FBI to open boxes to identify their owners and safeguard the contents, agents rummaged through hundreds of boxes, ran currency they found in front of drug sniffing dogs, and made copies of people’s most personal records. The DOJ then filed a massive administrative forfeiture claim to take more than $100 million in cash and other valuables, again, without charging any individual with a crime.

In other words, the court has ruled that the FBI is really a criminal organization that routinely abuses its power, and in this case it did so in order to literally steal millions from innocent Americans.

The ruling [pdf] returns the case to the lower courts, which had previously ruled in favor of the FBI, for further action. Its language also appears to demand that the FBI must destroy all data it obtained during these illegal searches. It is unclear however whether the decision requires the FBI to return the stolen money. Further litigation in the lower courts will likely settle this issue.

Regardless, the FBI’s behavior in this one case alone demonstrates its utter corruption. Not only has its officials been more than willing to help Democrats unfairly by attacking Republicans for political reasons, the case shows that those same officials are crooks as well. They need to go.

Moreover, they need to be frog-marched from their offices on the first day of office of the very next Republican who gains the presidency. There should be no mercy or grace period, which is what Trump did in 2020. The result was a four-year-long quiet insurrection within the FBI to undermine his entire administration.

That must not happen in 2025, should Trump win in November. On inauguration day every FBI agent and manager must either submit his or her resignation or be fired. They should told in no uncertain terms that they must not report to work, and that they no longer have any authority to enter any FBI facility or use any government equipment, from email servers to computer desktops. This will not only allow the new administration to start fresh, it will make more difficult for these thugs to do anything to sabotage that administration.

Nor am I being paranoid. These corrupt FBI officials have demonstrated quite openly their willingness to cheat, lie, defy the law for both political and personal reasons. To leave them in power for even one nanosecond after Trump has the power to remove them would be allow them the opportunity to defy that new administration, in ways that are too awful to contemplate.

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/the-fbi-must-be-wiped-clean-or-wiped-out-on-day-one-of-the-next-repubican-administration/ 


Delusional?

Naw.
View All Posts by User
RayR
2 years ago
Vivek Ramaswamy was the only candidate vowing to dismantle the FBI.

"Former FBI Counterintelligence Agent issues chilling warning to Vivek Ramaswamy:

“Be careful… I’d get some very, very competent help, some very competent people to do intelligence work for you before you went places."

https://www.analyzingamerica.org/2023/12/716360/ 

View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
Been awhile...


Dirtbag FBI agent charged with stealing from January 6 defendant



Is the FBI now hiring the scum of the Earth?

Well, you can decide, based on the kind of lowlife charges filed against one of their finest.

According to KTRK in Houston:

HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) -- A former FBI special agent for the Houston Field Office has been indicted on theft charges after being accused of stealing government and personal property from homes during FBI raids, according to U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

Authorities have arrested 36-year-old Nicholas Anthony Williams. According to the indictment, from March 2022 to July 2023, Williams allegedly took money or items from multiple homes while executing search warrants as an FBI special agent.

And who did he take money from?

But of course:

A Houston college student prosecuted for his participation in the Jan. 6 insurrection was one of people robbed by a Houston-based FBI agent, according to newly released court records.

Alexander Fan's complaint about missing cash and silver helped lead to the January indictment of FBI agent Nicholas Anthony Williams, according to court records.

Fan, 27, was sentenced to 12 months probation in connection to the riot. Fan was found guilty of entering and remaining a room in the Capitol building. He was accused of climbing into an office through a broken window after his entry was blocked by a closed door.

That's from the Houston Chronicle, which reported that it went down like this:

Fan's home was searched on the day he was arrested and the next day he reported to the FBI that items, including $2,500 and silvers bars, were missing from his bedroom. The items were not seized as part of the warrant served on his home, according to court records.

Months later, the FBI announced that one of its own agents, Nicholas Anthony Williams, had been indicted on theft charges, over accusations he stole money and property while executing search warrants between March 2022 and July 2023.

One of the three charges related to thefts is over the missing items at Fan's home.

Williams is also accused of stealing money during searches at homes in March 2022 and January 2023, as well as misusing a government-issued credit card and stealing agency cellphones, according to court records. The other theft victims weren't named in the indictment.

So much for America's premiere law enforcement agency. Apparently allowing one of those guys into your home is the same as leaving your front door unlocked for burglars.

This is astonishing to hear of, actually. When was the last time you heard of this kind of untrustworthy lowlife character at the FBI? A petty thief who steals like burglars do. He'd be an anomaly if he were merely on the cops. This guy is more like the Mexican cops who steal ransoms paid from kidnappers and then see the victims murdered, which has happened. He's a walking violation of trust.

This guy has reportedly been on the force since around 2019. Did anyone at the Bureau do background checks on him before handing him a badge and a gun? Did he take a polygraph to pass muster? How'd he get into this elite agency? Was there so much hiring going on as the agency expanded and money rolled in that they just let anyone into the agency, criminal behavior or not? That's a common experience in law enforcement agencies that expand too fast. It seems doubtful he just started stealing once he got into the FBI. For a rookie to have so boldly taken so much from homes being searched so soon seems unusual. Corruption is usually a long slide downward, but his was fast.

How'd he take the silver bars reportedly stolen and did he stuff them into his pockets? Did his partner notice and say nothing? Was stealing an instant response because he'd done it so often?. Was there a culture of thefts on this squad, which was continuously overlooked until the public complaints started to get into the press? Was he a DEI hire whose color was more important than his character? There are a lot of unanswered questions here.

Perhaps the most important question is why the bureau was searching this kid's family home at all on a mere charge of trespassing, and with a friendly, cooperative, give-no-trouble, contrite suspect? He was obviously trusting of them, based on the Chronicle report, and they violated that trust, stealing thousands in his family's property earned in a hardscrabble immigrant way by working long hours at dreary, thankless, restaurant jobs, saving every penny.

What kind of a sleazy lowlife could steal from such honorable, hard-working people?

Would Fan's complaint have been dismissed had he been the only one making the complaint? I don't know, but I sure as heck haven't heard reports about this kind of law enforcement behavior outside Mexico or Venezuela.

Maybe if the FBI would vet their agents for basic honesty, (I am sure this kid's family could give the lessons), it wouldn't be a problem at all.

I did read a study not too long ago, don't recall where, about how the Bureau actually likes having agents with discipline problems that normally merit firing on the force, because it leaves them more malleable for certain kinds of work that ethical agents would balk at doing. If so, this guy would be the poster boy for such a setup, the guy who persecutes political opponents on behalf of the Democrats, much like the dirty cops of the KGB, because he knows he could be fired at any minute for other transgressions.

Guys like that keep up with their dirty, dishonest behavior, and their political masters protect them.

Is that the picture that's starting to emerge here? What was this guy's discipline record before he apparently got canned and charged? And how many more are like this with this set of ethics in this agency, spying on Americans and persecuting political opponents? Maybe Director Christopher Wray should be called back to answer a few questions from Congress.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/02/dirtbag_fbi_agent_charged_with_stealing_from_january_6_defendant.html 

How about prosecuting this to the hilt? If it was some random white, MAGA, conservative married guy with kids...well...you know it would be different!

I would LOVE to read THAT study too! C'mon...list them deets!
View All Posts by User
JGKAMIN
2 years ago

“This guy has reportedly been on the force since around 2019. Did anyone at the Bureau do background checks on him before handing him a badge and a gun? Did he take a polygraph to pass muster? How'd he get into this elite agency? Was there so much hiring going on as the agency expanded and money rolled in that they just let anyone into the agency, criminal behavior or not? That's a common experience in law enforcement agencies that expand too fast. It seems doubtful he just started stealing once he got into the FBI. For a rookie to have so boldly taken so much from homes being searched so soon seems unusual. Corruption is usually a long slide downward, but his was fast.”



Like when a teacher or coach gets nailed for doing something wrong to a minor, people start going off about how that person could possibly clear a background check or blasting the employer saying they obviously don’t even do them. People seem to think background checks predict the future, they merely show previous reports so if this is his first transgression he would’ve obviously passed with flying colors. Safe to say the FBI is likely not hiring a Special Agent with any previous criminal behavior. Without any previous charges a polygraph would catch skeptical responses to questions, but it’s possible this person started living above their means or owes alimony/child support and started skimming to make up the difference since they got hired. If they got hired in 2019 they passed the background check, a follow-up would be done every 5 years thereafter which would’ve been this coming year and would show a bad credit report that may lead to corruption.
View All Posts by User
Abrignac
2 years ago

I did read a study not too long ago, don't recall where, about how the Bureau actually likes having agents with discipline problems that normally merit firing on the force, because it leaves them more malleable for certain kinds of work that ethical agents would balk at doing. If so, this guy would be the poster boy for such a setup, the guy who persecutes political opponents on behalf of the Democrats, much like the dirty cops of the KGB, because he knows he could be fired at any minute for other transgressions.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



I’d like to read that study.

Certainly wouldn’t say this doesn’t exist. However, I wouldn’t say this systemic though. Probably more of a localized issue based on the SAC.
View All Posts by User
Mr. Jones
2 years ago
DMV post #527

The few FELON THEIVES FBI-SSG AGENTS THAT STOLE $1++ MILLION IN CASH FROM MY H.U.T.
IN MARCH?APRIL ? OF 2013 WHO WERE never caught or prosecuted...
They still have my money...either in the evidence room, entered into the 2014 FBI BUDGET, IN THE SEVERAL PRICKS PERSONNEL BANK ACCOUNTS , OR 80% IN BARRY OBAMMY'S BANK ACCT AND 10% TO THE " BIG GUY " JOE STRANOSA AND 10% TO DIRECTOR COMEYS BANK ACCT.
View All Posts by User
ZRX1200
2 years ago
Steve Baker arrested…..

3 years of threats and a refusal to pronounce the charges.

Obama jailed a reporter too. I’m sure we’ll just as much as we did then.
View All Posts by User
RayR
2 years ago

Steve Baker arrested…..

3 years of threats and a refusal to pronounce the charges.

Obama jailed a reporter too. I’m sure we’ll just as much as we did then.

ZRX1200 wrote:



Arresting journalists for reporting?
I heard Putin and Xi do that too.
View All Posts by User
RobertHively
2 years ago
"The FBI's Double Agent" in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot.

"When FBI agents feared their informant might reveal the investigation’s flaws, they sought to coerce him into silence, at one point telling him: “A saying we have in my office is, ‘Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story,’ right?”"

https://theintercept.com/2024/03/06/gretchen-whitmer-kidnapping-informant/ 
View All Posts by User
Mr. Jones
2 years ago
That Gretchen Williams debacle kidnapping case is a FBI RAT INFESTED NARC CLUSTER FUCCCC....

IT was forced on half retarded white guys with I.Q.'s of 25?? Maybe?

The were all in "Sped Ed" classes and are SLOW MO's in minimum wage jobs, unemployed or homeless and recruited by stupid white supremacist gangs, as butt boys for their pleasure because most of them are closet MOHO's and they made them do the dirty work because they are freaking SPEDS and easy to coerce....

This entire case is nothing but A FBI ENTRAPMENT CASE with paid informants coercing sped tards into a bogus plan they couldn't possibly understand or pull off...

Bunch of FBI BUNK....
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

That Gretchen Williams debacle kidnapping case is a FBI RAT INFESTED NARC CLUSTER FUCCCC....

IT was forced on half retarded white guys with I.Q.'s of 25?? Maybe?

The were all in "Sped Ed" classes and are SLOW MO's in minimum wage jobs, unemployed or homeless and recruited by stupid white supremacist gangs, as butt boys for their pleasure because most of them are closet MOHO's and they made them do the dirty work because they are freaking SPEDS and easy to coerce....

This entire case is nothing but A FBI ENTRAPMENT CASE with paid informants coercing sped tards into a bogus plan they couldn't possibly understand or pull off...

Bunch of FBI BUNK....

Mr. Jones wrote:




https://revolver.news/2024/03/leaked-audio-exposes-fbi-dirty-dealings-with-key-informant-architect-of-whitmer-kidnapping-plot/ [/i]
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
This tactic is right out of the Nazi SS playbook. So, when I say the FBI is the SS for the DNC...tell me how I'm wrong?


Viral Videos Appear To Show FBI Agents Visiting Homes Over Social Media Posts


Two videos have gone viral on X showing FBI agents visiting people’s houses to ask questions about offensive social media posts.

The first clip shows three people who claim to be FBI agents visiting a woman called Rolla Abdeljawad at her home in Stillwater, Oklahoma.

The woman asks them to identify themselves, but they refuse to do so while being filmed, before claiming they had already shown the woman their IDs.

Wow. The FBI reportedly sent agents to a woman’s house in Stillwater, Oklahoma to question her over her political beliefs that she posted on Facebook.

Unless these guys are impersonating federal agents, this is a very serious red line they’ve crossed. 😳pic.twitter.com/q3nwukWPfA
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) March 29, 2024

“What we’d like to do is have a conversation with you about some social media posts that you’ve made, would you be willing to talk to us about that?” asks one of the agents.

The woman refuses to talk until she has a lawyer present, before the agent asks her for contact information.

“No, I’ll get back to you,” states Abdeljawad.

Another agent then asks the woman to have her attorney “contact the FBI office in Oklahoma City.”

Abdeljawad is told by one of the agents that “Facebook gave us a couple of screenshots of your accounts.”

“Well you can’t arrest me for freedom of speech, we live in America, so it’s kind of weird that you want to come talk to me about me exercising my freedom of speech,” responds the woman.

“We do this every day, all day long we talk to people, it’s just an effort to keep everybody safe, make sure that nobody has any ill will or bad intent or anything like that,” responds one of the agents.

After Abdeljawad asks if the FBI would question “all the citizens in America” who used Facebook, the agent responds, “We certainly would if we had any sort of concerns.”

The clip then shows the agents leaving the scene.

The woman later posted a message on her Facebook confirming that the individuals were FBI agents.

“Just verified with local law enforcement that, the indivs who came to my home, really were FBI per their license plate. My lawyer will contact the OKC field office. The lawyer did inform me that, these instances are now common but, the lawyer doesn’t believe that FB sent them the screenshots of my posts. Rather, it seems like a fishing expedition. I do not fear them. My only concern as, I told the cop is that, someone in my state will do something or that they would and then use my posts in a malicious attempt to “smear” me. Just *remember, I am a Muslim, an obligated protector of creation. I enjoin what is good and forbid what is wrong.”

Another X user called Kam St. Martin posted, “The FBI came to my house over a TWEET! Not cool. My pinned tweet that’s still up.”

The video she posted shows a man who introduces himself as an FBI special agent asking to speak to someone over a post which he subsequently explains is “about the Baton Rouge subject.”

🚩The FBI came to my house over a TWEET!
Not cool.
My pinned tweet that’s still up.
⁦@elonmusk⁩ pic.twitter.com/5GauyJTXTt
— 𝐊𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐭.𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 (@KAM4Texas) March 29, 2024

The pinned tweet in question features an image of a black man who St. Martin claims killed her cousin.

“This monster drugged my 27 yr old cousin at the L’Auberge Casino in Baton Rouge last February. He dumped her half naked dead body like trash. Rap sheet a mile long. He walks today on PROBATION. Damion Matthews may you reap what you have sown,” it states.

🚨This monster drugged my 27 yr old cousin at the L’Auberge Casino in Baton Rouge last February. He dumped her half naked dead body like trash.
Rap sheet a mile long. He walks today on PROBATION .Damion Matthews may you reap what you have sown. @govjefflandryy pic.twitter.com/pW7Bo9HsjQ
— 𝐊𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐭.𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 (@KAM4Texas) February 20, 2024

The post has 39,000 likes.

Is the FBI really visiting private homes to police social media posts that criticize alleged murderers?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/viral-videos-appear-show-fbi-agents-visiting-homes-over-social-media-posts 


That ENTIRE organization needs to be leveled! If this is where they're at combating crime, terrorism and a host of other things they were actually created to do then the crime numbers in this nation would be a flatline ZERO in all major categories. Instead...we've got worse!

A Freedom of Speech "violator" is now warranted a visit from an unidentified goon squad. Coming to a neighborhood near you!
View All Posts by User
Abrignac
2 years ago



Another X user called Kam St. Martin posted, “The FBI came to my house over a TWEET! Not cool. My pinned tweet that’s still up.”

The video she posted shows a man who introduces himself as an FBI special agent asking to speak to someone over a post which he subsequently explains is “about the Baton Rouge subject.”

🚩The FBI came to my house over a TWEET!
Not cool.
My pinned tweet that’s still up.
⁦@elonmusk⁩ pic.twitter.com/5GauyJTXTt
— 𝐊𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐭.𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 (@KAM4Texas) March 29, 2024

The pinned tweet in question features an image of a black man who St. Martin claims killed her cousin.

“This monster drugged my 27 yr old cousin at the L’Auberge Casino in Baton Rouge last February. He dumped her half naked dead body like trash. Rap sheet a mile long. He walks today on PROBATION. Damion Matthews may you reap what you have sown,” it states.

🚨This monster drugged my 27 yr old cousin at the L’Auberge Casino in Baton Rouge last February. He dumped her half naked dead body like trash.
Rap sheet a mile long. He walks today on PROBATION .Damion Matthews may you reap what you have sown. @govjefflandryy pic.twitter.com/pW7Bo9HsjQ
— 𝐊𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐭.𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 (@KAM4Texas) February 20, 2024

DrMaddVibe wrote:



I remember this case. As far as the person listed above having worked 15 years in law enforcement in the area mentioned I’m well acquainted with him. The stories I could tell……..
View All Posts by User
Gene363
2 years ago
An interesting video about Hoover, the criminal:



Birth of the FBI - J. Edgar Hoover - Forgotten History
The escape pod: https://cigarbid.freeforums.net 
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

An interesting video about Hoover, the criminal:



Birth of the FBI - J. Edgar Hoover - Forgotten History

Gene363 wrote:



The OG trans!
View All Posts by User
Mr. Jones
2 years ago
Wellllll,

All'a I gotta say to all these 3? Stories is....

Just one thing....

At least they came up to these people and showed them their I.D.'S
AND BADGES , then asked them several questions....
All in under a 30 minute window???.


They absolutely N.E.V.E.R. showed me an I.D. OR BADGE...
OVER 300 FBI GANGSTALKED MY SORRY ASS OVER 7 state area over 6+ years....and they never ever asked me one question....none at all...

These 3 people should be happy it went the way it did with their
FBI intimidation.....

Mine was totally anonymous, totally illegal on multiple local,state and federal levels , and they tried to murder me over 9 times....

Those 3 peeps got off easy ....
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com