There are a lot of Biden supporters saying the same thing.

8trackdisco wrote:

I’m drinking more wine.

HockeyDad wrote:

From CNN commentators:

John Anderson....Biden wasn't coherent
David Axelrod....Seems disoriented, Democrats - panic set in
Kate Dedingfield....no two ways about not a good debate for Biden
Van Jones...time for the party to take a different path, painful
Alyssa Farrar Griffin....Donald Trump will be the President-Elect

Abrignac wrote:

He’s reading from his note cards a lot, it would be naive to think he wasn’t fed the questions ahead of time.

JGKAMIN wrote:

Biden is half comatose and all over the map...
I can't believe he's our current president?

Trump keeps spouting lies upon lie but at least he's awake and cognizant
But living in his own world of lies, believing his own lies,...

The only thing TRUMP has is that he is awake....
TRUMP: "I had the best environmental #'s ever" ???Says who??

"I'll stop the Ukraine war before I take office on jan.20 ,2025"
Yeah rrrrrriiiiigggghhhhttttt???

They are both freakin ' M.O.R.O.N.S.

Mr. Jones wrote:

For the most part I felt the moderators did a good job of being neutral. Since the did question Trump about his criminal cases they should have questioned Biden about the lies such as his uncle being eaten by cannibals, having taken a train across a bridge for years yet no train tracks were ever installed on said bridge, etc….

Abrignac wrote:

For the most part I felt the moderators did a good job of being neutral. Since the did question Trump about his criminal cases they should have questioned Biden about the lies such as his uncle being eaten by cannibals, having taken a train across a bridge for years yet no train tracks were ever installed on said bridge, etc….

Abrignac wrote:

"Lies" vs Criminal Cases are 2 different things... had they spent time on "lies" the damn think would still be going... had they just talked about the lies told DURING the debate... it would still be going...

drglnc wrote:

Nuetrality wasn't an issue, IMO.
Your other point is "apples to oranges."

rfenst wrote:

For the most part I felt the moderators did a good job of being neutral. Since the did question Trump about his criminal cases they should have questioned Biden about the lies such as his uncle being eaten by cannibals, having taken a train across a bridge for years yet no train tracks were ever installed on said bridge, etc….

Abrignac wrote:

I didn’t watch a second of it. I did sit outside and smoke a great cigar though. I will be watching tidbits and highlights all weekend on YouTube I’m sure.

- Did they question Biden about legal issues? Being too incompetent to be held accountable for mishandling classified documents and the information that connects his bank account to Hunter’s activities?

jeebling wrote:

Both deal with character. Regardless it was a shitshow. There were no winners. Only losers…that being the American people.

Abrignac wrote:

are you trying to imply that trump has better "character"? or that he doesn't lie? continuously? i mean c'mon man...

drglnc wrote:

Absolutely not. Nor am I going to agree that only one should have his character questioned. They both need to have their character examined or neither should.

Abrignac wrote:

so when you have 2 with "Bad Character" and 2 that have "lied" either on purpose or by shear stupidity, or Both... but one is also a convicted felon with more charges to answer for does that not play into it?

i mean you have the head of the GOP currently, a group that claims to be the party of "traditional" family values... that is a confirmed serial adulterer, ties to Epstein, comments like the "locker room talk", walking in on underage girls half dressed during a pageant, and upset that he cant date his own daughter and some how that is equal to a guy that "sniffs hair"... i agree that both should be looked at but if you are looking fairly that scale related to "character" is not even close to balanced...

drglnc wrote: