Hey Sy....
My gosh!! we are pretty close to agreement. Just an example for some of you extremists on the left and the right... A conservative like Sylance and a semi-liberal like me can come together and I think that's cool!!
I agree with the concept of total coverage good and bad. My concern is the fact that the press currently does not seem to work in such a way as to ensure free and open coverage. It affects the stories that get time and those that don't. Ratings rule, mixed with other hidden adgendas.
Another thing is today's television journalists are so very controlled by their company's profit adgendas. Not as many reporters in the field (to save costs) and so we hear more repeated news than ever. The concept of "Liberal media bias" is the biggest myth in the world these days with 97% of television news owned by right-leaning individuals. So are slogans like "Fair and Balanced". We really need a broad spectrum of journalists from both the left and the right with total freedom to cover events both good and bad. Then we as a country would have a way to know true costs and benefits of this war. But with the current news network corporate interests in control, this is just not happening and perhaps not likely to change in the foreseeable future. And again I'm concerned about this.
At least the Internet provides different perspectives but also provides many sources of half truths and propaganda from both left and right.
DB