RICKAMAVEN
22 years ago
DUTY
256514.jpg

Click to View Image133 View(s)

Club3006
22 years ago
Caption should read:

**Kerry thinking** If I poke myself in the eye with this solute...I could probably get another Purple Heart.
RDC
  • RDC
  • Herf-A-Holic
22 years ago
Too bad Kerry didn't report for duty as a Senator
RDC
  • RDC
  • Herf-A-Holic
22 years ago
...oh wait, he wasn't in Cambodia at Christmas either.

Hmmmmm, why does this guy lie so much and why do so many people believe him? Inquiring minds want to know!

LOL
Jdllizard
22 years ago
RDC, you hit the nailed on the head with that one. I just don't get how someone can lie so much and people just go along with it.
John L
xibbumbero
22 years ago
LMFAO,Good one Rick. X
rastusmcnair
22 years ago
Jdllizard, We've seen it ever since the last election, should be used to it by now.
RICKAMAVEN
22 years ago
RDC

it was "stars fell on alabama" and that was w's song.
rophoto
22 years ago
Speaking of "how someone can lie so much and people just go along with it"

Remember that little WMD thing.

grond
22 years ago
Speaking of WMD's

October 1990
"Iraq Has Developed A Chemical Weapons Capability." "Today, we are confronted by a regional power, Iraq, which has attacked a weaker state, Kuwait. ... The crisis is even more threatening by virtue of the fact that Iraq has developed a chemical weapons capability, and is pursuing a nuclear weapons development program. And Saddam Hussein has demonstrated a willingness to use such weapons of mass destruction in the past, whether in his war against Iran or against his own Kurdish population." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/2/90, p. S14330)

January 1991
"If we go to war in the next few days, it will not be because our immediate vital interests are so threatened and we have no other choice. It is not because of nuclear, chemical, biological weapons when, after all, Saddam Hussein had all those abilities or was working toward them for years..." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 1/12/91, p. S369)

November 1997
"It is not possible to overstate the ominous implications for the Middle East if Saddam were to develop and successfully militarize and deploy potent biological weapons. We can all imagine the consequences. Extremely small quantities of several known biological weapons have the capability to exterminate the entire population of cities the size of Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. These could be delivered by ballistic missile, but they also could be delivered by much more pedestrian means; aerosol applicators on commercial trucks easily could suffice. If Saddam were to develop and then deploy usable atomic weapons, the same holds true." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp. S12254 -S12255)

December 1997
"The Security Council should authorize a strong UN military response that will materially damage, if not totally destroy, as much as possible of the suspected infrastructure for developing and manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. …Saddam Hussein has intentionally or inadvertently set up a test which the entire world will be watching, and if he gets away with this arrogant ploy, he will have terminated the most important multilateral effort to defuse a legitimate threat to global security." ("US Lawmakers Threaten Military Action Against Iraq," Agence France Presse, 12/12/97)

February 1998
"[T]here are set of principles here that are very large, larger in some measure than I think has been adequately conveyed, both internationally and certainly to the American people. Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East." (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 2/23/98)

"Saddam Hussein has violated … that standard [against using weapons of mass destruction] on several occasions previously and by most people's expectation, no matter what agreement we come up with, may well do so again. The greater likelihood is that we will be called on to send our ships and our troops at one point in the future back to the Middle East to stand up to the next crisis." (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 2/23/98)

September 1998
"We’re Going To Have To Make Some Fundamental Decisions About Whether To Follow A Policy Of Containment Or Deprive Iraq Of Its Weapons Of Mass Destruction." (Eric Schmitt, "U.N. Arms Inspector Who Quit Is Told He Can’t Make Policy," The New York Times, 9/4/98)

December 1998
"Americans need to really understand the gravity and legitimacy of what is happening with Saddam Hussein. He has been given every opportunity in the world to comply. The president does not control the schedule of UNSCOM. The president did not withdraw the UNSCOM inspectors. And the president did not, obviously, cut a deal with Saddam Hussein to do this at this moment. Saddam Hussein has not complied. Saddam Hussein is pursuing a program to build weapons of mass destruction." (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 12/16/98)

More Quotes from 2000-2003:
September 2000
"There Is Nothing More Destabilizing Or Threatening [To The World] Than Weapons Of Mass Destruction. ... I think all of us are deeply concerned about the degree to which certain countries seem to be contributing to the potential of instability in the world. Obviously, there is nothing more destabilizing or threatening than weapons of mass destruction. We have spent an enormous amount of time and energy focused on Iraq, on Iran, on Russia, on loose nukes, on nuclear materials, and of course on China and on the issue of the transfer of technology to Pakistan." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 9/11/00, p. S8321)

October 2002
"Mr. Kerry … Said Iraq’s Weapons Of Mass Destruction Posed ‘A Real And Grave Threat’ To The United States." (Dave Boyer, "Key Senators Of Both Parties Back Bush On Iraq War," The Washington Times, 10/10/02)

"Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits? Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents? Does he do all of these things because he wants to live by international standards of behavior? Because he respects international law? Because he is a nice guy underneath it all and the world should trust him?" (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)

"It would be naive to the point of grave danger not to believe that, left to his own devices, Saddam Hussein will provoke, misjudge, or stumble into a future, more dangerous confrontation with the civilized world." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)

"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)

January 2003
"[W]e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He miscalculated America’s response to that act of naked aggression. He miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated the impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an American President. He miscalculated his own military strength. He miscalculated the Arab world’s response to his misconduct. And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm." (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 1/23/03)

"If You Don’t Believe Saddam Hussein Is A Threat With Nuclear Weapons, Then You Shouldn’t Vote For Me." (Ronald Brownstein, "On Iraq, Kerry Appears Either Torn Or Shrewd," Los Angeles Times, 1/31/03)

February 2003
Kerry Said Leaving Saddam Hussein "Unfettered With Nuclear Weapons Or Weapons Of Mass Destruction Is Unacceptable." (Jill Lawrence, "War Issue Challenges Democratic Candidates," USA Today, 2/12/03)

"[Kerry] said the Bush administration has taken too long to make its case for military action, ‘but nonetheless I am glad we’ve reached this moment in our diplomacy.’ Kerry added: ‘Convincing evidence of Saddam Hussein’s possession of weapons of mass destruction should trigger, I believe, a final ultimatum from the United Nations for a full, complete, immediate disarmament of those weapons by Iraq. Over the next hours, I will work with my colleagues in the Senate to fully examine the evidence offered by the secretary for a complete and close reading. But, on its face, the evidence against Saddam Hussein appears real and compelling.’" (Wayne Washington, "Kennedy, Others Question Timing Of Attack But Presidential Hopefuls Back War With Iraq," The Boston Globe, 2/6/03)

March 2003
"Senator John F. Kerry … had lambasted Bush’s diplomatic efforts, despite voting last fall in support of a congressional resolution authorizing military action to disarm Iraq of any weapons of mass destruction. ‘It appears that with the deadline for exile come and gone, Saddam Hussein has chosen to make military force the ultimate weapons inspections enforcement mechanism,’ Kerry said." (Glen Johnson, "Critics Of Bush Voice Support For The Troops," The Boston Globe, 3/20/03)

I think Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction are a threat, and that’s why I voted to hold him accountable and to make certain that we disarm him. I think we need to …" (NPR’s "All Things Considered," 3/19/03)

There you go!! Now who's lying about WMD's. You guys criticize Bush for taking the same position as your friggin' candidate.
CWFoster
22 years ago
Well Grond, he was mislead by the Bush administations intelligence reports!







OH, he's one of the guys responsible for the sorry state our inel community is in, isn't he! my bad!
usahog
22 years ago
Yea and if he would have been in more then 24% of those meetings he was suppose to be in at the time he would have had better Intelligence on the subject matter he was spewing off about and then Blaming Bush Now for it LMAO!!!

Great Post Grond... now I hope you wore your hardhatfor the repercusions about to take place LMAO!!!

Hog
Sonny_LSU
22 years ago
Great post, Rick!

I am going to love rubbing your right-winged noses in the aftermath of Bush's loss.

Oh no! Here it comes!
.
.
.
.
BUSH GOOD! KERRY BAD!
JonR
22 years ago
Yo Sonny_LSU:

Your wrong again.

Bush=Good / kerry=antichrist

JonR
Sonny_LSU
22 years ago
LOL....well, in that case, be prepared to be lead by the unrighteous!
CWFoster
22 years ago
Sonny, we got used to that in the '90s, last time a democrat got in!
Sonny_LSU
22 years ago
Yup, and had the best economy in history......I couldn't careless who was polishing his knob.

Also, cyclic economy angles have some truth to them, but each and every administration directly affects the economy at the time they are in office.

Oh no! Here it comes yet again!!!!!!
.
.
.
.
BUSH GOOD!

KERRY BAD!
Sonny_LSU
22 years ago
.
.
.
.
.
CLINTON BAD TOO!
usahog
22 years ago
"Yup, and had the best economy in history......I couldn't careless who was polishing his knob."

this shows exactly where your brains are at....





































































In Your Wallet!!!!!

Hog
EI
  • EI
  • Herf-A-Holic
22 years ago
"Yup, and had the best economy in history......I couldn't careless who was polishing his knob"

Sonny check the stats. Best economy in history is now. Second best was the Regan years.
The economy during Clinton was a left over from Bush one
Users browsing this topic