RknRmnd
  • RknRmnd
  • Connoisseur Topic Starter
Thursday, October 7, 2004 7:29:00 PM
I was gifted a cigar by my cigar connection guru and was told that it is a Padron second made with the PAM 1964 filler with a maduro wrapper. It is box pressed and without label. He mentioned that they will be on the market later this year and I was wondering if anyone else has heard this or not?

RJ

cgbgjr
Friday, October 8, 2004 2:11:00 AM
I hope you didn't ever give this person real money in exchange for cigars. Fake cigar experts are as common in most parts as fake isoms.

I wouldn't believe a cigar was a Padron second unless I heard it directly from a member of the Padron family after they signed and notarized a Title 18 (this is true under penalty of perjury bla bla bla) statement and passed a sobriety test.

bassdude
Friday, October 8, 2004 6:48:00 AM
never heard of PAM seconds.

LMK what you think after you smoke it.

GTofMurphy
Friday, October 8, 2004 10:48:00 AM
It sounds like the "fuma" which is the Padron 2nd but that is not box pressed. Fuma is the "Miami only" pig-tailed cigar that is now available nationwide. I have always liked these but I could never find them. I remember people on this board saying there was no such cigar. I just picked up five to see if they are still good. A local retailer has them for $1.99/39.00 a box Yum!

GT

dave97402
Friday, October 8, 2004 12:20:00 PM
GT, email me if you would?

dave97402 at hotmail.com

cgbgjr
Friday, October 8, 2004 1:25:00 PM
I believe the cigar you are describing is a short filler cigar. Since the term "seconds" is not precisely defined it might be possible to use the term "second" in that way. For example there is a short filler El Credito that some choose to call a second of LGC. I think that is a rather imprecise use of language particularly since there are some long filler El Creditos (available at CI, btw). I like CI's approach in calling such cigars "similar to" rather than calling them seconds. I would hope a "guru" would add equal precision to their definition.
hoyodude
Friday, October 8, 2004 2:32:00 PM
GT, I'd love some info on those Fumas.

Thanks,

chris

hoyodude
Friday, October 8, 2004 7:24:00 PM
ummmm....that would be:

clittleATrochesterDOTrrDOTcom

dccrens
Friday, October 8, 2004 7:35:00 PM
My local also has been carring the fumas but I haven't tried them. They only appear to come in a "panatela" size... I am more a toro or robusto...

Cheers,

Slimboli
Saturday, October 9, 2004 3:49:00 AM
The Fumas are a far cry from a PAM 64 ... some people like them, but personally, I wouldn't waste my time or money on them ... no mater how cheap.

I'll bring up the 'Picture Post' I had posted awhile back ...

Homebrew
Sunday, October 10, 2004 7:29:00 PM
Bleeech,

Fumas.

3000 maddie

YUMMM

As good as a PAM No

But mmmmm mmmmmmm good.

Just don't bid past CI retail. I like them to round out an order and save on shipping.

Later

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

hegemonic
Sunday, October 10, 2004 8:30:00 PM
Padron is a brand that I adore above all others (including Fuente and ISOMS). I'm a BIG fan of Nicaraguan tobacco and Padron is definitive of Nic tobacco and always consistent. That being said...

Regarding these Padron Fumas, they are great smokes. I've smoked a box of them already. If you are adverse to smoking something less than a long-filler cigar, then these are not for you (you f'n snob! 😉 ) .

I expected them to be terrible because I've heard awful things about this cigar from some people on newsgroups and in cigar shops, but I was really surprised when I sparked one up and enjoyed it greatly. I sparked another to make sure it was not a fluke, and after 26 or so tries, I've yet to find a bad one.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, so if you don't like them, then that's more for me.

Still lurking,

heg

btw, welcome back JJ 🙂