(c&p)
In college and graduate school, I was hesitant to consider spanking as a viable form of punishment. I agreed with all the standard responses to spanking. "Spanking is so barbaric," I'd heard people say. "Doesn't spanking just teach a child how to hit?" others would ask. "I believe spanking is abusive to the child!" some would declare.
True, spanking can be done in a barbaric way, and many children have been physically abused by parents who beat them, rather than spanked them, with the wrong motives and in the wrong manner. However, children will learn how to hit whether they have been spanked or not!
Many other objections to spanking have been raised over the past three decades. And those objetions are raised with good motives; children are very precious to us, and no one wants to see even one child abused. And spanking can be abusive. Spanking that is not done for the purpose of instruction is abusive. Spanking that is not established as a consistent consequence ahead of time is abusive. Spanking done in rage or anger is abusive.
Spanking that is done in a loving and immediate manner, however, is the most effective discipline for the child. Instead of verbally berating the child or delaying the punishment - thus forcing the child to feel quilty and "bad" for a longer period of time - immediate spanking allows the child to feel immediately forgiven. Immediate spanking, a consequence that follows bad behavior, shows the child that it is the behavior that is bad, not the child. --Dr. Bob Barnes
Hm?