lou2row
  • lou2row
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Sunday, March 1, 2009 10:44:00 AM
Email showed up in my inbox followed by another from "administrator" stating attachment blocked and switched (or something like that).

Was this something you sent out? It had a huge list of addresses that it was going out to. Just wanted to let everyone know something may be wrong with it.

big chief
Sunday, March 1, 2009 11:09:00 AM
No pole dancer for you!

actually, I've had similar experience more than once

bloody spaniard
Sunday, March 1, 2009 11:16:00 AM
IMO, he's going to be blacklisted as a spammer if he keeps it up.

Best to keep it to under 50 names at a time or go through a professional email (flyer) provider- probably only $50/mos for his purposes.

05busa
Sunday, March 1, 2009 3:38:00 PM
dont listen to the 2nd emil. u can still open it with no problems. Have your $1s ready,well worth it.
wvwa34
Sunday, March 1, 2009 4:38:00 PM
and to think ,i had a front row seat!!!!!!!
JonR
Sunday, March 1, 2009 4:44:00 PM
Why are youse peoples making fun of Polish dancers?

JonR

Homebrew
Sunday, March 1, 2009 5:02:00 PM
LOL,

I enjoyed the attatchment.

She is very talented.

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

tj2001cobra
Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:02:00 PM
Mine was blocked as well.
Thunder.Gerbil
Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:19:00 PM
I already deleted the message so I can't tell you the finite details of it, but basically from what I saw earlier, the "Administrator" message was sent out by an improperly configured mailserver (not Charlie's). Attachement blocking messages should not be sent out to "reply-all" but rather only "reply-to-sender".

Most likely nothing to worry about really, just a local mailserver policy blocking the message either due to attachment format or size.

tj2001cobra
Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:29:00 PM
9 - I agree. It was something that our exchange server blocked. Probably because it reaked of a forwarded email.
Thunder.Gerbil
Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:42:00 PM
^

Was it your sever that sent out the rejected message?

I don't remember and I don't have the message anymore to check specifics, but I do remember that the headers of the reject message were not even close to being RFC compliant (actaully it was more like: what headers, there really weren't any), and you just said your mailserver is exchange, and MS Exchange servers are known for doing crap like that.