blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:31:00 AM
Im looking to start doin a little photography and need a camera.

Any suggestions on a nice entry level one?

Anybody have one layin around that they need to get rid of??

blopez50 at unm.edu

Thunder.Gerbil
Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:49:00 AM
Digital SLR or film?

If film - SLR, TLR, lens shutter or focal plane?

Thunder.Gerbil
Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:50:00 AM
or reflex...
fishinguitarman
Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:57:00 AM
I have acid reflux
blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:01:00 PM
Digital SLR

Sorry FGM!

ggriffi
Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:04:00 PM
If you are looking for a film camera, I have a Canon T70 with 5 different lenses if you are interested.

ggriffi755 AT gmail DOT com

blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:05:00 PM
Thanks for the offer man but im gonna go digital....
donutboy2000
Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:31:00 PM
bluwater
Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:37:00 PM
nine.....
blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:39:00 PM
^ thanks

Its lookin like the Sony Alpha A200 is gettin all the votes. Anybody have one? Like it?

leonardo
Sunday, July 19, 2009 1:05:00 PM
My humble opinion would be to go with Canon xti or Nikon d40. Of course, sony is fine, but canon and nikon have the best glass, and what most of the pros use (whatever that is worth). You can also check out kenrockwell.com or fredmiranda.com for more advice.
teedubbya
Sunday, July 19, 2009 1:12:00 PM
I'd go canon or nikon as well. Talk to Jet
blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 1:31:00 PM
Anyone have an email for Jet??
andytv
Sunday, July 19, 2009 1:43:00 PM
I saw a Nikon D-40 kit at Sam's the other day for less than $400.
blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 3:04:00 PM
Anyone have a Canon PowerShot SX10 IS and like it??
Thunder.Gerbil
Sunday, July 19, 2009 3:15:00 PM
Digital... meh...

I'm a film guy...

...for digital, talk to Jetblasted or IUROX.

Be warned: Jet's a Nikon guy, IUROX is Canon guy - you're going to get good arguments on both sides.

blopez50
Sunday, July 19, 2009 6:37:00 PM
Well it looks like I might go ultra-zoom intead of SLR......
jetblasted
Sunday, July 19, 2009 6:49:00 PM
ggriffi ... you'd be better off selling that as a lot on craig's list, or sell it by the piece on e-bay . . .

blopez50 ... username at msn . . .

1st of all, start doing research ... read anything you can find about Nikon vs Canon ... There's a ton of dedicated and informative and interactive Groups on Flickr.com ... take anything that Ken Rockwell says with a grain of salt as he's a dip-**** ...

I would advise going to any higher-end camera store and do a hand's-on test ... get an idea of how the camera feels, as each brand's ergonomics are different . . . Take a memory card with you, and push the camera's limits on High ISO's, ect . . .

T.G is right ... I'm a Nikon Guy ... but, Canon makes an excellent product, too ... I never have like Canon though, and that goes back over 30 years ... The Nikon D40/x or D60 are good cameras ... The D90 is better ... If you can afford it, then I would suggest a D300 ... It's build quality is excellent with it's metal body where the other cameras are plastic ... I shoot with a D70s (older model) and a D700 (latest Pro Camera) . . .

There's strong rumors that the Nikon camera line is due for an upgrade, so there might be some new models coming out soon . . . The D5000 is out and supposedly has good video if that interests you . . . It's an entry level camera . . .

One thing I would consider, is getting better glass ... You can buy your camera body new, but I'd buy good glass used at KEH.com ... KEH just happens to be a few miles from my house, but it is the world's largest used camera broker and has been for 30 years ... Most "kit lenses" are just Ok and are better suited for daytime not good for low-light . . .

So, do your research, do a hand'-on test, buy your camera body new, and your lenses used . . .

Good Luck . . .

leonardo
Sunday, July 19, 2009 6:50:00 PM
All depends on how good of quality you want for your pictures, right TG? From what I've seen, the quality of photos from digital slr is significantly better than from a digital point and shoot. But p&s is so much more convenient, if you don't want to mess with adjustments, changing lenses, etc. Also, if you shoot things that are not moving, p&s should be fine. If shooting moving kids, animals, things in low light, slr is much better. And film is even better quality, and less convenient.

The Nikon D40 kit is amazingly cheap, per post above for Costco.

jetblasted
Sunday, July 19, 2009 6:55:00 PM
Get the biggest sensor you can afford . . .