Whether you agree with him or not, the much maligned Fuzz does bring a balanced (I shudder to think of what the reaction to my characterization of his posts as "fair" would be) view to the cesspool that is the CBid message boards. He may cross the line sometimes, but who defines what/where the line is? Are there not people from the "other" side that cross the line too?

Maybe nobody cares at all. From an outsider's perspective, anyone on this board who disagrees with Fuzz is characterized as a socialist/terrorist/communist.

Fuzz is reviled and ridiculed in almost every misc forum thread, if only because his opinion is different from the prevailing opinions here.

So I ask all the fans of the "fair and balanced" (emphasis on the quotes here) "news" network - does "fair and balanced" mean diversity of opinion, or is it a bull**** slogan? Do you welcome differing opinion or reject it with canned rhetoric?

For all of the patriotism and love of country expressed here, I find the lack of tolerance for differing opinions highly hypocritical.

For the record, I would like to establish my bipartisan credentials by stating unequivocally that I am looking forward ti someday plowing Sarah Palin. In the pooper.

If that"s not fair and balanced, I don't know what is.

I already feel bad for having posted this....on a day when there is so much more to worry about. Lots of stress and heartache today.

Nevertheless, I proudly stand by my statements regarding Mrs. Palin and her perky booty. Mmm hmmm.

I wouldn't want to sodomize Ms Palin. Not because she's unattractive, but because she's too much of a sterile, manipulative princess, as if she's never had an orgasm.

But I would sodomize Greta van Susteren. She has that sexy/creepy thing going on, like Sandra Bernhardt. She'd be one crazy ass bitch in the sack.

That'd be my generous contribution to bipartisanship. You're welcome.

^You'd pork Van Sustern??? You might as well say you'd do Louis Rukeyser. Not that I don't get your point about flawed women having a certain appeal, but she is one manly lookin' woman.

FuzzNJ has demonstrated that he is capable of forming his own opinions on issues based on his own exposure and research .

This, of course, is a flawed approach. He should embrace the status quo and just adopt the opinion of conservative talk radio.

It's easier that way........plus you really don't have to understand what you're talking about.

(critical thinking is HARD!!!)

Poor FuzzNJ.

I still feel worse for CROS but it is close.

I wonder if cbc is as tolerant of viewpoints that differ from his own?

CBC will have a seat on "The View" once the Big Bab-Boo can figure out how to boot the QB's wife!

^probably not...........so it is never really a good idea to consider his opinions......because intolerance is the "new black".

What a freak'n hypocrite. You, Fuzz and Rick spend all your time attacking, criticizing, belittling and dismissing as stupid the core values of most of the members here. When folks respond to these attacks they are characterized as ignorant, stupid, mind dead Limbal zombies, homophobes, religious nuts, circle jerkers, etc., etc., yet somehow, you guys actually believe that you are the victims. So typical.

Oh, silly me. I forgot how Liberals think. You’re suppose to be able to attack, criticize and belittle everyone here, and we’re suppose to thank you for opening our blinded eyes. Any other response makes us big bad ignorant meanies.

Hey, he can have a knife fight with Whoopie backstage and hash it all out.

If this website were actually a political discussion forum.........with the typical heavy moderation you see on many popular forums; I wonder who here would sink and who would swim.

It is easy to rant and rave and slander on a discount cigar forum where we all have a pretty damn long leash........but go and try it in a room full of attack dog moderators and really savvy political hacks from BOTH sides.

My opinion is the the conservative contingency here would be banned in a week.

^^ that's what happens on CL RnR. Illiberal lefties stifle free speech by flagging off viewpoints that don't toe the orthodox status quo socialist line.

chuckle

^13 - You got it, the liberal idea of "free speech" is censoring and squashing all opposing viewpoints so they're free to bombard everyone with their speech.

If this were a political discussion forum, you all would sink. Sure, you would have your various political arguments over which party is better and who is ignorant and everyone would occasionally feel smug and vindicated as they "won" various debates. In the end, those of us that represent the status quo, globalization, and influence/control both major political parties win.

Scoreboard, you lose.

#15......HEY!!! Liberal free speech is just like Conservative free speech!!!!

(I knew there was common ground!)

#16........controlling both political parties is key!!!

What most people don't realize is that the two parties are the "winners" and the "soon to be winners".

Whether they call themselves democrats or republicans is fairly irrelevant.

Pants on the ground!!!!!!!

17. Author: andytv

Possibly the very best point made here in years!

^thanks....be sure to catch the afternoon show.