jackconrad
Saturday, October 9, 2010 1:01:40 AM
Damned tasty !
donutboy2000
Saturday, October 9, 2010 2:51:13 AM
According to a report put out by Consumer Report and published on the Food Production Daily website, far too many chickens are still infected with bacteria that can lead to food borne illness. Researchers sampled the bacteria content of 382 chickens purchased from one-hundred food stores. The bad news is they found only thirty-four percent of the birds tested were free of disease causing bacteria. The good news? This number is better than what was found when they last tested in 2007. The two bacteria tested for in this study were Salmonella and Campylobacter – both of which can cause serious illness and even death in humans. The biggest problem was contamination with Campylobacter – found in sixty-two percent of the chickens tested.

Most food poisoning from poultry comes from eating undercooked chicken since the bacteria are destroyed by cooking the meat sufficiently. Great care must be taken to avoid contact with raw chicken meat since even a single drop of infected raw chicken juice is enough to cause illness in a person. This means cutting boards that have touched raw chicken need to be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected before being used to prepare other food. Utensils also need to be disinfected in a similar fashion.

How can you avoid eating undercooked chicken that can lead to illness? According to the CDC, chicken should be cooked to an internal temperature of at least 165 degrees Farenheit before serving; and juices from the inside of the chicken must be clear – not pink or red. Care should be taken to avoid cross-contaminating other food that’s being prepared. This means washing hands thoroughly after touching raw chicken.

http://healthmad.com/nutrition/the-dangers-of-undercooked-chicken/#ixzz11qGaeKAj 

andytv
Saturday, October 9, 2010 7:49:03 AM
IMO, you are more likely to contract bacterial infections from handling chicken carelessly (read: normally) than from eating it just a little undercooked.

Think cutting boards, cutlery, kitchen countetops, dishrags, etc....................then touching other foods, touching your face, and so on.

dkeage
Saturday, October 9, 2010 11:15:06 AM

IMO, you are more likely to contract bacterial infections from handling chicken carelessly (read: normally) than from eating it just a little undercooked.

Think cutting boards, cutlery, kitchen countetops, dishrags, etc....................then touching other foods, touching your face, and so on.

andytv wrote:

I use a condom.......no exceptions......

gringococolo
Saturday, October 9, 2010 3:34:40 PM
I think chicken abstinence should be taught in kitchens. Safe chicken education is obviously not working. I am not trying to politicize this thread, but statistics show that more chicken related ilnesses occur mostly in democrat states.
blackfoot11
Saturday, October 9, 2010 11:09:41 PM

I use a condom.......no exceptions......

dkeage wrote:

so, your sayin you're chicken?

Homebrew
Sunday, October 10, 2010 12:16:26 AM
I don't Fowl up,

I eat beef and pork. Chickens are Fowl creatures.

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

snowwolf777
Sunday, October 10, 2010 9:44:38 AM
I agree with what Andy says. That's why we use plastic cutting boards, keep them separate for separate tasks, and have the Chlorox wipes close by and used often during cooking.

That said, I don't do medium rare chicken, thanks. Or even medium well. I don;'t care what the current CW is. Just doesn't appeal to me.

[-x

jpotts
Monday, October 11, 2010 5:20:46 PM

I agree with what Andy says. That's why we use plastic cutting boards, keep them separate for separate tasks, and have the Chlorox wipes close by and used often during cooking.

That said, I don't do medium rare chicken, thanks. Or even medium well. I don;'t care what the current CW is. Just doesn't appeal to me.

[-x

snowwolf777 wrote:

If I recall correctly, someone did a comparison between plastic and wooden cutting boards, and found that wooden cutting boards were more anti-microbial. Seriously.

And I'm not a big one for uncooked poultry. To me it is slimy, and has a funky taste.

Homebrew
Monday, October 11, 2010 10:53:51 PM

If I recall correctly, someone did a comparison between plastic and wooden cutting boards, and found that wooden cutting boards were more anti-microbial. Seriously.

And I'm not a big one for uncooked poultry. To me it is slimy, and has a funky taste.

jpotts wrote:

The Health dept here doesn't allow wooden cutting boards to be used in food service.

I agree with you on the chicken though.

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)