Please give me reason(s) NOT to vote for Romney!

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

bloody spaniard
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

14 years ago

Otherwise, I will convince wife to do same.
The man in the White House HAS to go- unless there's something I don't know. Voting for anyone else besides Romney would be a wasted vote (unfortunate reality IMHO).

Btw, despite sitting out the last election (couldn't 't stomach McLame), I've voted for (and contributed to) only Republicans since 1973(?) EXCEPT for dubbya's re-election when I went with the other liar (Kerry).

Edited by user 14 years ago | Reason: Not specified

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your CigarBid Forums forum account or Register a new forum account

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

Can't vote for the Big O myself but if you really need a reason I'd float Romney care. Meet the new boss same as the old boss as Roger and DMV would say.

tailgater
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

Reason #1:
If you are a left-winged moon bat who thinks that our federal government should continue its current path by taxing the productive citizens so that the sloth can live more comfortably.

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

Obama is to Romney
As brown sugar is to aspertame

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

At least with Obama we already know who has most-favored status under the Cone of Protection. Mitt's cone is less certain.

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

Obama is to Romney
As brown sugar is to aspertame

ZRX1200 wrote:

You like Obama better?

bloody spaniard
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

14 years ago

Brown sugar is definitely healthier... but I assume Jaime was just making the frick vs frack comparison.

Points taken. So I assume you guys will sit this one out and/or protest vote, allowing Obama to waltz in again?
Perhaps you are counting on a Republican congress and it's "hard-hitting" leaders like the orange Speaker of the House Boehner to counterbalance Obama?

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

I'll either vote Romney or maybe write in Bea Aurther or something. But I will vote.

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

Le HockeyDad is counting on the status quo being maintained.

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#10

Le HockeyDad is counting on the status quo being maintained.

HockeyDad wrote:

you are voting for sarkozy?

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#11

you are voting for sarkozy?

teedubbya wrote:

Absolutely! The other guy is a socialist.

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#12

I'm voting RP.

Done compromising, will never vote for another establishment R again. And TW no I dont like him better, my point was for all their differences their purpose is the same. Mittens is bought and paid for just like Soetoro and both are ineligible constitutionally btw (both of their fathers).

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#13

depends on who's gonna give me the most free stuff... 😟

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#14

ZRX1200 wrote:

So you are voting "present"

bloody spaniard
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

14 years ago

#15

^ exactly- I like that guy's independent streak but when it comes to some of his foreign policy...

depends on who's gonna give me the most free stuff... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

That war (on poverty?) was lost long ago. Just getting worse. Would you turn down "free stuff"?

I can relate, Jaime, but are you trying to tell the Republicans that they should run a Reagan in 4 years by making it easier for Obama to win this time?

Wouldn't bet the mortgage on Sarkozy winning...

Edited by user 14 years ago | Reason: Not specified

tailgater
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#16

I'll either vote Romney or maybe write in Bea Aurther or something. But I will vote.

teedubbya wrote:

Bea Arthur ran a failed campaign in the late '70s.
Her slogan was "I will win this election, or my name will be Maude"

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#17

Sarkozy is toast. France will be taking another wussified socialist turn very soon.

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#18

I understand fully what you're saying Bloody. Not exactly how I feel but I see it two ways. You can stand up and be heard or you can try to get involved.

The party has to change.

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

14 years ago

#19

And you guys have entirely too much faith in voting machines!

bloody spaniard
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

14 years ago

#20

I understand fully what you're saying Bloody. Not exactly how I feel but I see it two ways. You can stand up and be heard or you can try to get involved.

The party has to change.

ZRX1200 wrote:

I agree in principle, bro, but what happens to the country in the next 4 years? You figure at least 2 Supreme Court justices will be nominated by Obama. At the very least, we need a more business- friendly environment. Romney might fit that ticket.

Perhaps if another Perot (new party?) decides to run... then, some of us would jump ship. RP just doesn't do it for many of us disenfranchised.

Users browsing this topic

Important Information: