What's the difference? The guys there all act like women anyway. Might as well be all women. Probably have more testosterone.

bloody spaniard wrote:

Wait, doesn’t Boehner being his b1tch count?

Brewha wrote:

Uh oh...somebody wants to play with Georgetown rules!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I see the discussion of supporting equal pay/opportunity for women less simply than in terms of how many did or would the two major candidates hire. Certainly, supporters of the "cause" should be disappointed in Obama's current appointments, but I'm pretty sure he and Romney have different views about the issue in general.

frankj1 wrote:

You're making entirely too much sense for this forum.

Shills! Stat! Clean up on aisle 5

pdxstogieman wrote:

I see the discussion of supporting equal pay/opportunity for women less simply than in terms of how many did or would the two major candidates hire. Certainly, supporters of the "cause" should be disappointed in Obama's current appointments, but I'm pretty sure he and Romney have different views about the issue in general.

frankj1 wrote:

Professor Irwin Corey, is that you???😲

bloody spaniard wrote:

my idol! the self proclaimed "World's Leading Authority". I can only dream of approaching his penchant for obfuscating the most mundane creatonin with the verbosity of one trained in the art of salinization.

frankj1 wrote:

Your logical elocution leading to a less than succinct closure sends me into a soporific spiral of excitement followed by synaptic paralysis, ergo your observations nurture the id of all those who conga to the beat. ...and I'm not just saying that to hear myself bleat.

bloody spaniard wrote: