http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23766274
So no.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
I got rid of Satellite, and cable, over 10 years ago. My only connection to information, and entertainment is the net.
Homebrew wrote:
What he said.......I have a Roku and a digital antenna for football. Plus, if you know where to look you can stream NFL games.
So to answer your question again, no, I find the content on stations like MSNBC much more objectionable than Al Jazeera's.
so it's all Gore's fault ehh..?? 🤔 🤔
and what happened to the thing that said foreigners couldn't own tv and radio stations..??? 😕
Mr. Buckwheat, you are a powerful man.
...change or drop your cable/satellite/etc... service if they put Al Jazeera on their basic cable package?
Buckwheat wrote:
No.
In the Arab world, the are considered liberal. I have more respect for them than I do MSNBC.
Al J. Is a decent news source.
HockeyDad wrote:
+1
all I can say is yawn,,,,,,,,,,,,
wheel,
'Al Jazeera America will provide domestic and overseas news coverage with bureaus in a dozen cities including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Miami and Detroit. The Qatar-based Al Jazeera network announced the purchase of Al Gore’s Current TV earlier this year, and has hired former CNN journalists Ali Velshi and Soledad O’Brien among its correspondents.'
DrafterX wrote:
I think Rupert Murdock got that overturned.
I have AJ in my pkge watched it a bit,,,
wheelrite wrote:
You yawn a lot. Are you bored or just oxygen deprived?
...and why do you finish your posts with wheel, wheel when there's an electronic stamp identifying you as the poster for all to see?
bloody spaniard wrote:
maybe sometimes Bill just isn't 'rite' ???
I sorta understand the 'yawn'...AJ doesn't have the boobs and tight dresses that Fox does...and they completely overlook the assinine 'human interest' stuff on the others that may not necessarily 'interest' us, but does on occassion 'entertain'
If it isn't a story that really interests me, they can come off a little stiff and maybe boring
