victor809
12 years ago
Anyone know anything about this? How is a warning shot against an estranged husband entering your house not allowed but someone on the street is? Perhaps she should have said he had skittles and she didn't know him.

http://www.salon.com/2014/03/03/florida_wants_to_put_marissa_alexander_in_prison_for_60_years/ 
HockeyDad
12 years ago
If I recall correctly, they were arguing, she left into the garage. She then re-entered with a gun and fired through the wall at her husband and a couple of kids.

She was the one entering and shooting, not him. No stand your ground applied.
victor809
12 years ago

If I recall correctly, they were arguing, she left into the garage. She then re-entered with a gun and fired through the wall at her husband and a couple of kids.

She was the one entering and shooting, not him. No stand your ground applied.

HockeyDad wrote:



Interesting. So they called it a warning shot... but it was a "warning she was about to enter the room and kick some @ss shot"?
Grady Wilson
12 years ago
That is HOT!
HockeyDad
12 years ago
What is being asked for is that she be cut lose for shooting at her husband and two kids in exchange for the Treyvon Martin case.

(which seems a bit odd to me since this is a case of black-on-black crime)

There is a "warning shot" bill now progressing through the state legislature.
PorknBeans
12 years ago
warning shots seem like a colossal waste of good ammo
victor809
12 years ago

warning shots seem like a colossal waste of good ammo

PorknBeans wrote:



I would normally say it seems like a wise move to possibly avoid a lengthy homicide sentence.

But given that 60 years is a homicide level penalty, seems to have not done her any good. She may as well have killed him, may have gotten a lighter sentence.

If he were dead she could have said he was acting aggressive ... could have planted a snapple on his body or something.
HockeyDad
12 years ago
I think she had 3 convictions of aggravated assault with a firearm. 20 years each concurrent. Now the state wants them consecutive. (Mandatory sentencing guidelines)

The problem with shooting him is she would have had to shoot his kids as well.
victor809
12 years ago

I think she had 3 convictions of aggravated assault with a firearm. 20 years each concurrent. Now the state wants them consecutive. (Mandatory sentencing guidelines)

The problem with shooting him is she would have had to shoot his kids as well.

HockeyDad wrote:



But that can easily be classified as a late term abortion.... get a Dr to sign saying he performed it... it's all good. 🙂
Abrignac
12 years ago
In a few years I retire. Until then I'll have to bite my tongue. If only walls could talk.
HockeyDad
12 years ago
If walls could talk, that would really creep me out. I'd be like walking through a hallway and all of a sudden the wall shouts "Hey Frenchie! German tanks are on the border!"

I hate walls now just thinking about it.
Users browsing this topic