Fed Judge Rules Obama Unconstitutional..!!

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

11 years ago

or somethin like that... 🤔

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your CigarBid Forums forum account or Register a new forum account

jackconrad
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

It is because it was not passed by a 2/3 majority..

jetblasted
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

Holder already said they won't follow the law.

bs_kwaj
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

Big O don't need no stinkin' majority...

TMCTLT
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

Since it IS their job to interpret Law NOT make it.....a copy should have been given to the Majostrates FIRST before passing this new LAW.](*,)

mikey1597
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

It's good to be King, yo pissboy!

Krazeehorse
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

He'll get all the details worked out during his third term.

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

I don't get #5 unless it's sarcasm. If it's their job to merely interpret not legislate (which it should be) there would be zero reason for them to have it before it is law, unless you want them to legislate.

TMCTLT
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

[quote=teedubbya]I don't get #5 unless it's sarcasm. If it's their job to merely interpret not legislate (which it should be) there would be zero reason for them to have it before it is law, unless you want them to legislate. [/quote

Why?? What good has it done to have them read it After Becoming Law? Would it not make more sense to have read Every word FIRST then determine it's Constitutionality? Did it make sense to you that they passed a Massive Tax on the entire American public.....Without Reading it FIRST?

Abrignac
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

#10

TMCTLT wrote:

Absolutely not. Though, I get your play on Nancy Pelosi.

Separation of powers. To have a Federal judge issue an opinion or even a ruling prior to a law being passed would amount to an influence on the drafting of such a law. Clearly a violation of the spirit of the separation of powers concept. But, I suspect you already know that.

TMCTLT
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

#11

Abrignac wrote:

I see, so what does passing a 2,500 page Tax Law before reading it called?? Separation of brain from body?

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

#12

No way I want the courts involved in the legislative process by weighing in during the process. No effen way. Their job is to weigh in after the fact which they have done.

Two things. First your original post reminds me of victor. It swings both ways. You say their job is not to legislate yet you want them in the legislative process.

Second the op isn't about obamacare. It's about Obama. It says he is unconstitutional.

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

11 years ago

#13

That's what I heard. .. 😟

cacman
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

#14

It's about Obama. It says he is unconstitutional.

teedubbya wrote:

It says he's a narcissistic twit.

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

#15

Maybe this will help

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FFroMQlKiag

8trackdisco
Herf-A-Holic

11 years ago

#16

We as a country should just forget about teaching kids civics and how the government works. The next president (regardless of who wins) should rule solely by Executive Order. Skip congress all together four four years and be the dictator that each president eventually becomes right at the outset.

What we have as a separation of the executive, legislative, and judical branches is a joke. Rip it up, and let's get to the dirty.

It's gonna happen sooner or later.

Edited by user 11 years ago | Reason: Not specified

Users browsing this topic

Important Information: