Nope. This sounds more like Victor:
http://www.dailyrepublic.com/news/solanocounty/fairfield-man-arrested-for-beating-homeless-man/ 

cacman wrote:

Stop the hate...

If Victor would embrace his neighbors instead of hating them it would be so much better. I'm sure with some bunk beds he could house several and provide them with a hot meal, bathing and toilet facilities etc. This problem could be solved if you would just stop being so selfish.

Gene363 wrote:

Just think how many more would be housed in your home Gene.

victor809 wrote:

Stop the hate...

If Victor would embrace his neighbors instead of hating them it would be so much better. I'm sure with some bunk beds he could house several and provide them with a hot meal, bathing and toilet facilities etc. This problem could be solved if you would just stop being so selfish.

Gene363 wrote:

Sure, but they live in your neighborhood. We have some here, but they prefer living under bridges close to the city.

I am doing my part, donating to food banks so they can eat. 🍺

Gene363 wrote:

Nope. Victor would never do this:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/07/us/cnn-heroes-homeless-doctor-jim-withers/index.html 

cacman wrote:

Would you? F'n communist.

victor809 wrote:

Everyone has their own way of helping their fellow man.
Some donate their time & expertise, food, clothing etc.
While others bash & bully them for blocks.

F'n liberal racist.
🐴

cacman wrote:

They'd gladly live in your neighborhood if you gave them food and shelter there.

This is something that pisses me off about the irritating "do gooders". People love to support a food bank, or a shelter, or some bs like that. But they don't want those institutions in their neighborhood, because that gives these locusts a reason to come there. Pisses me off when people from out by presidio or sunset come in to the tenderloin to volunteer at soup kitchens or bring a stack of 20 pizzas to a park they sleep in and BS like that.

They congregate where they are fed and housed. Feeding and housing them in a neighborhood away from where you live is the same NIMBY crap everyone pulls, it's just cloaked in some do gooder crap.

victor809 wrote:

Your situation is a perfect example of the Law of Unintended Consequences, with a caveat. I believe, many do gooders/liberals/progressives do this on purpose. They feel good about it, keep the poor poor and in (your) neighborhood not theirs. They can also vilify and assign guilt on anyone that opposes them. Unfortunately, you suffer from it and the taxpayers pay the bill.

Gene363 wrote:

then put poison oak in their tents.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Sure, but they live in your neighborhood. We have some here, but they prefer living under bridges close to the city.

I am doing my part, donating to food banks so they can eat. 🍺

Gene363 wrote:

Food banks?
All these years I thought it was suppose to be sperm banks.

I have lived a wasted, yet satisfying, life.

frankj1 wrote:

Friday night.
Frank's gonna make a deposit.

tailgater wrote: