well.... not yet but it might happen..... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Drug addled haters !

tonygraz wrote:

Dreaming of the day.

Burner02 wrote:

Drug addled haters !

tonygraz wrote:

Why don't you rather than say this kind of drivel don't you lay out for us WHY she shouldn't be?? Just a thought from a supposed " drug addled hater "

TMCTLT wrote:

.... Taking the stance of "prove why XXX shouldn't be arrested" eh?

I think I understand now why you are so obsessed with this country becoming a jack-booted dictatorship. You're hoping for a job in the secret police.

victor809 wrote:

Why don't you rather than say this kind of drivel don't you lay out for us WHY she shouldn't be?? Just a thought from a supposed " drug addled hater "

TMCTLT wrote:

When did you stop beating your wife? (illustrative rather than accusatory for those who are less able to read through intent)

teedubbya wrote:

Who's following who ?

tonygraz wrote:

Well hello Tony.....

No, with the evidence against this miserable excuse for a human being let alone politician and career LIAR it seemed like a reasonable question.

TMCTLT wrote:

I did not engage in personal remarks that have 0 to do with the OP.

TMCTLT wrote:

Dude, it's a post about a politician needing to be arrested without any specific identification of what charges you would have her arrested for. When someone called out the OP on simply being a "hater" your response is "prove why we shouldn't arrest her for unidentified and unnamed charges!".... if that isn't head of the secret police squad material I don't know what is.

victor809 wrote:

That DrafterX is much more of a trouble maker than DrafterY.

tonygraz wrote:

Your right Victor, shame on me for assuming they've been keeping track of this upstanding public servants wrong doings. If one is not aware of her baggage and lies....they're out to lunch

TMCTLT wrote: