ZRX1200
11 years ago
ZRX1200
11 years ago
se
men

Is **** out?
victor809
11 years ago

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/258609/starbucks-lattes-are-filled-with-****-says-confused-pastor/


Two video clips are priceless.

ZRX1200 wrote:



I'll see your conspiracy jizzy starbucks latte and raise you an ACTUAL beer

http://jezebel.com/this-summers-most-refreshing-beverage-is-horse-jizz-bee-1722487816 
opelmanta1900
11 years ago
got nothing against teachers, have too many of them in my family...

if you need a union/ rely on a union to get ahead at your job, you're already not worth what you're paid...

lots of people have to be in unions to do their job, nothing against them either...

but the scumbags of today who actively try to unionize non-union employees are typically greedy and lazy...

kudos to the university for exploiting the law to benefit themselves financially...
opelmanta1900
11 years ago

I'll see your conspiracy jizzy starbucks latte and raise you an ACTUAL beer

http://jezebel.com/this-summers-most-refreshing-beverage-is-horse-jizz-bee-1722487816 

victor809 wrote:



this reminded me, I want to get a t-shirt made up for paul that says "I get all my political news from Jezebel"... think he'd sport that? maybe a bumper sticker...
Abrignac
11 years ago

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/258609/starbucks-lattes-are-filled-with-****-says-confused-pastor/


Two video clips are priceless.

ZRX1200 wrote:



I'm sure there will be a price put on them. I hope preacher man has done a good job of hiding his assets. Because I'm thinking Starbucks is going to own every dime he has.

As a side note, I'm wondering if ET has called him this week.
victor809
11 years ago
Unionization is forming a monopoly on the supply of labor. Just as with monopolies in other industries, it can lead to anti-competitive behavior.

There are situations in the real world where the government grants companies exclusivity. Just as in the real world, there is a rationale behind unionization.

In both instances it can be exploited and lead to poor product at a high cost.

I think the better approach would be to have competing unions. Allow unionization, but also require multiple unions in one field. This would give indvidual workers increased bargaining power vs the employer (the initial reason for the union), but would not allow the union to have a monopoly on the supply of labor.

but hey... this isn't really a discussion on unions, more an amusement at the convoluted logic the religious university was using.
opelmanta1900
11 years ago
my point wasn't just that unions are bad but rather that they are bad enough that anything any institution legally gets away with doing in order to prevent them from being established amongst the staff of said institution should be praised, "convoluted logic" included...

multiple unions within the same workplace competing for the same employees would essentially nullify a union's purpose...

that said, I'm all for it, think it's a great idea... but I'm pretty sure if you start a union to compete with the teamsters, you'll be murdered, literally....
banderl
11 years ago

my point wasn't just that unions are bad but rather that they are bad enough that anything any institution legally gets away with doing in order to prevent them from being established amongst the staff of said institution should be praised, "convoluted logic" included...

multiple unions within the same workplace competing for the same employees would essentially nullify a union's purpose...

that said, I'm all for it, think it's a great idea... but I'm pretty sure if you start a union to compete with the teamsters, you'll be murdered, literally....

opelmanta1900 wrote:




Yeah, probably have a urine soaked light post fall on him or something.
tonygraz
11 years ago
There are unions because workers were treated unfairly by employers. They are justifiable, but subject to the same political crap of any organization.
ZRX1200
11 years ago
"Bukake ruined my carpet"
Users browsing this topic