Doesn't look like there will be much of a relationship between the incoming Whitehouse and CNN.

Abrignac wrote:

We made it clear that we were not publishing any of the details of the 35-page document because we have not corroborated the report's allegations. Given that members of the Trump transition team have so vocally criticized our reporting, we encourage them to identify, specifically, what they believe to be inaccurate.

teedubbya wrote:

interesting response

(CNN)CNN's decision to publish carefully sourced reporting about the operations of our government is vastly different than Buzzfeed's decision to publish unsubstantiated memos. The Trump team knows this. They are using Buzzfeed's decision to deflect from CNN's reporting, which has been matched by the other major news organizations.

We are fully confident in our reporting. It represents the core of what the First Amendment protects, informing the people of the inner workings of their government; in this case, briefing materials prepared for President Obama and President-elect Trump last week.

We made it clear that we were not publishing any of the details of the 35-page document because we have not corroborated the report's allegations. Given that members of the Trump transition team have so vocally criticized our reporting, we encourage them to identify, specifically, what they believe to be inaccurate.

teedubbya wrote:

So Jakes Tapper, another POS reporter, has tweeted that Mark Coen (a Trump Lawyer) was in fact not in Prague as they alleged talking to agents. This after Coen produced evidence of his whereabouts and said he'd in fact never been to Prague. They nevery even bothered trying to call him.......this is how hard they tried to verify their info.

Keep swinging boys.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Tail and abrig my understanding is CNN was reporting on the intel agency briefing obama and trump on Russia floating the dossier story, not the content or merit of. I think this is actually accurate and not of dubious accuracy. Buzz feed did something completely different and sloppy (much like wikileaks)

Lumping them in with buzz feed et al is disingenuous at best, but it is what Trump wants. I think some are being mentally lazy or selective. IDGAF about CNN, and know some don't care about the truth, but it seems to me we are on a slippery slope.

teedubbya wrote:

.......Damn I finally figured it out TW must stand for Truth Warrior!!!! Got it 🍺

TMCTLT wrote:

You can't handle the TRUTH..!! 😠

DrafterX wrote: