Speyside
9 years ago
I imagine this is what the socialists will be saying today. I was listening to the news on the radio and they said president Trump plans to pull out of the Paris accords because they are bad for business.

DrafterX
9 years ago
Well, the Paris Climate thing is a big hoax and stuff.... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
tailgater
9 years ago
Nothing wrong with clean air and renewable energy.

But there is a lot wrong with crippling regulations that do nothing but put money into the hands of goverments and have negligible effect on the climate.
ZRX1200
9 years ago
Progress has a price.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
9 years ago
It's almost to the point already where it alternative energy sources will be more cost effective than fossil based fuels.

No point in worrying about it, the economy itself will take care of it.

I'm all for common sense regulation (don't dump your sh1t in the drinking water, k thnx)... but too much is too much.
Buckwheat
9 years ago

Nothing wrong with clean air and renewable energy.

But there is a lot wrong with crippling regulations that do nothing but put money into the hands of goverments and have negligible effect on the climate.

tailgater wrote:



Okay, I'm game. Specifically which regulations are crippling which specific businesses?
DrafterX
9 years ago
the ones the EPA writes regarding oil & gas... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
Buckwheat
9 years ago

the ones the EPA writes regarding oil & gas... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ

DrafterX wrote:



Really that's not specific in the least. The devil is in the details. [ram27bat]
DrafterX
9 years ago
The ones Obama signed... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
gummy jones
9 years ago
correct me if im wrong but arent india and china, the largest perpetrators, exempt for 20 or so years anyways?

the whole thing, at least with what is proven/provable, is a massive money grab and redistribution plan
TMCTLT
9 years ago

Okay, I'm game. Specifically which regulations are crippling which specific businesses?

Buckwheat wrote:




Well...two can play that game.....which ones aren't? ๐Ÿคจ
DrafterX
9 years ago
True. .true. . ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
DrafterX
9 years ago
If other countries are serious about reducing emissions they can hire private contractors and consultants... they don't need the US to do it for them.. ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
Speyside
9 years ago
As per usual the rest of the world wants us to foot much more than our fair share of the cost. The same problem we face with NATO.
TMCTLT
9 years ago

As per usual the rest of the world wants us to foot much more than our fair share of the cost. The same problem we face with NATO.

Speyside wrote:




Yessir, been doing it for far too long. And in that vein I'm absolutely back our President in calling the other nations out over it.
Buckwheat
9 years ago

Well...two can play that game.....which ones aren't? ๐Ÿคจ

TMCTLT wrote:



The regulation of gasoline that took out the Tetraethyllead.

I'll try to find some others tonight as I actually have a lot of work to do today.
DrafterX
9 years ago
shoulda been optional instead of a total ban.... I want leaded gas damnit..!! ๐Ÿ˜ 
jjanecka
9 years ago
Considering the faulty data which the Paris agreement was based upon, I think it is in the best interest of Americans to not sign the agreement.
frankj1
9 years ago
what is Tillerson's (formerly of EXXON) opinion?
DrafterX
9 years ago
I heard he was all for it... but he was prolly gonna get paid to do a bunch of conversions and fracking and stuff over there somewhere... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
Users browsing this topic