delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
9 years ago
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/cnn-announcement-retracted-article/index.html 

Three CNN reporters who did a story on a Trump campaign supporter who allegedly had dealings with a Russian bank that was determined to be false have been let go.

Real news? ... fake news? ...
DrafterX
9 years ago
Did the Trump campaign supporter get whacked..?? 😕
Abrignac
9 years ago
Abrignac
9 years ago
BlamenTed Turner for producing the first 24 hour news channel (CNN). There just isn't that much news to justify its existence. They're more a content provider and less a news organization. Where is Walter Cronkite when you need him?
delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
9 years ago

Did the Trump campaign supporter get whacked..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:



...of all things...he got an apology...


dude's name is Scaramucci...wonder if he can do the fandango...
Abrignac
9 years ago
In the recent video footage obtained by Project Veritas, John Bonifield a Sr. Producer at CNN, admits to several beliefs that are in direct conflict with the official CNN narrative that Trump has colluded with Russia, and that Russia has interfered with the 2016 election. Bonifield expresses clear doubts that there is a fire behind the Russia smoke, stating, “I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime.” He also confirms suspicions that CNN staff is ideologically biased against Trump, stating, “I know a lot of people don’t like him and they’d like to see him get kicked out of office…”

Bonifield even further confirms CNN’s bias against the President, stating, “I think the President is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me…you have no real proof.”

Bonifield exposes that Russia has been great for CNN’s ratings, and that orders from CEO Jeff Zucker himself have directed CNN to pursue Russia leads at the expense of other stories. Bonifield states “And the CEO of CNN said in our internal meeting, he said ‘good job everybody covering the Climate Accords, but we’re done with it let’s get back to Russia.’”

He further comments on Russia, “it’s mostly bull**** right now. Like, we don’t have any giant proof…if it was something really good, it’d leak.”
jjanecka
9 years ago
Why don't they hammer in on Obama for ACTUALLY colluding with the Russians on the election.
Abrignac
9 years ago

Why don't they hammer in on Obama for ACTUALLY colluding with the Russians on the election.

jjanecka wrote:



Because they aren't a news organization. They're a Democratic propaganda orgsnization.
frankj1
9 years ago

Why don't they hammer in on Obama for ACTUALLY colluding with the Russians on the election.

jjanecka wrote:


I heard it was Denmark...
Speyside
9 years ago
tailgater
9 years ago

...of all things...he got an apology...


dude's name is Scaramucci...wonder if he can do the fandango...

delta1 wrote:



Thunder bolt and lightning.

tailgater
9 years ago
And John Kerry's boat is named Scaramouche.
It means "a cowardly braggot" often depicted by a Clown character.

I hear Theresa named it.


delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
9 years ago
he he...heard she did that after John tried 56 other names...
Speyside
9 years ago
Galileo Figaro Magnifico.
teedubbya
9 years ago

Why don't they hammer in on Obama for ACTUALLY colluding with the Russians on the election.

jjanecka wrote:




Because he didn't and it's the dumbest line of deflection/spin I have seen in a long time... almost as if the admin doesn't know the definition of collusion or their blind supporters won't really care.
DrafterX
9 years ago
then there's the fact that colluding isn't even illegal... but they sure went after Trumps like he ate a puppy-dog or somethin... 😟
gummy jones
9 years ago

then there's the fact that colluding isn't even illegal... but they sure went after Trumps like he ate a puppy-dog or somethin... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



didnt seem to matter when the obama admin meddled in the Israeli elections or brexit or any of the other elections

i personally dont care
all the outrage was just comical and sad
Shakespearean almost
teedubbya
9 years ago
I think obama was public in his support ... i didn't realize he used the cia and our intel agencies to break the laws of those countries/alliances to direct a covert operation possibly aided by the other parties.... now that I know that it is a direct correlation and I am outraged.
TMCTLT
9 years ago

Because he didn't and it's the dumbest line of deflection/spin I have seen in a long time... almost as if the admin doesn't know the definition of collusion or their blind supporters won't really care.

teedubbya wrote:





Yeah....but ain't it fun to just toss sh*t out there and see what sticks?? I mean that's what the press has been doing since the election, but doing just the opposite for Obummer....they were / ARE his spin machine and they do it happily.

Blind supporters.....that'd be funny if not so disgusting, unless your talking about Soetoro supporters then your SPOT ON.
teedubbya
9 years ago
I'm talking about both/all. it is amazing to me how many justify what they do by something they hate someone else doing.
Users browsing this topic