delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
8 years ago
I've done a lot of reading recently on the topic of gun control and mass shootings. The last successful gun control measure, the assault weapons ban passed in 1994 and allowed to expire 10 years later, did little to reduce the number of people killed. Moreover, the number of people killed in mass shootings is minuscule, compared to more common causes of death in the US. Even the total number of people killed by guns, including victims of mass shootings, is fewer than the number of people killed in auto accidents, poisonings, falls and other accidents, diabetes and a host of other diseases, and by the flu. Meanwhile, the number of legally owned guns has grown exponentially.

The fact that the right to own firearms is Constitutionally protected removes it from similar legal scrutiny that allowed regulation of the auto, tobacco and oil industries. Gun owners view their guns as the only way to defend themselves and their loved ones in an increasingly frightful world, another basic right in America. This basic right over-takes any discussion about what to do to reduce the number of gun-related deaths. Given our culture, understandably so...

It is now obvious to me that regulating guns is the wrong solution to the "problem" of American gun deaths. And as our society becomes more polarized, it seems that the incidence of gun violence which has historically been mostly self-inflicted, or aimed at known persons, will increasingly target strangers. We have to look elsewhere for answers because advocating more gun laws is a futile exercise.
DrafterX
8 years ago
that's what I've been trying to tell you guys... 🤐
delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
8 years ago
Serious...so don't hit me in the head with your golf club...

we have many more serious causes of death than homicides with guns, and would be better off trying to address those...

it's hard to just shrug and say "whatever" when some crazy loon murders dozens of innocent persons, and understanding that the numbers of those types of incidents, and victims per incident, is rising, but it's pointless to say guns are the problem...
rfenst
8 years ago

Even the total number of people killed by guns, including victims of mass shootings, is fewer than the number of people killed in auto accidents, poisonings, falls and other accidents, diabetes and a host of other diseases, and by the flu. Meanwhile, the number of legally owned guns has grown exponentially.

delta1 wrote:




So, other problems cause more deaths than guns therefore we shouldn't try to solve gun deaths?
MACS
8 years ago

Serious...so don't hit me in the head with your golf club...

we have many more serious causes of death than homicides with guns, and would be better off trying to address those...

it's hard to just shrug and say "whatever" when some crazy loon murders dozens of innocent persons, and understanding that the numbers of those types of incidents, and victims per incident, is rising, but it's pointless to say guns are the problem...

delta1 wrote:



I don't even golf, brother... and I respect you too much to hit you with anything. 😄
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago

So, other problems cause more deaths than guns therefore we shouldn't try to solve gun deaths?

rfenst wrote:



I'm of the opinion that we don't really have a problem.

From a statistical standpoint, I believe I read somewhere that there are somewhere on the order of around 10,000 gun related deaths per year in the US where the majority of those are suicides.

There are well over 300,000,000 people in the US.

Now of those gun related deaths, a statistic I just found says that about 3 percent of the murders are from legally purchased firearms... lets call it 5000 (it's probably a little high, but easier for arguments sake).

So that's roughly 150 murders by legal firearms per year in the United States.

Which isn't much... but you could spin this in a way that fits your argument if you want.

There's roughly 30 deaths per year or so by lightning strikes...

So you can argue that you are 5 times as likely to be killed by a legal firearm than get struck by lightning!!!

Wait, if the probability of dying by lightning is only 20% of that of dying by legal firearms, then it to must be a problem... maybe we should do something about lightning.

Ya, we should push congress to legislate something to ban lightning, if we can ban lightning, surely that would be sufficient justification to ban currently legal guns.
frankj1
8 years ago

I'm of the opinion that we don't really have a problem.

From a statistical standpoint, I believe I read somewhere that there are somewhere on the order of around 10,000 gun related deaths per year in the US where the majority of those are suicides.

There are well over 300,000,000 people in the US.

Now of those gun related deaths, a statistic I just found says that about 3 percent of the murders are from legally purchased firearms... lets call it 5000 (it's probably a little high, but easier for arguments sake).

So that's roughly 150 murders by legal firearms per year in the United States.

Which isn't much... but you could spin this in a way that fits your argument if you want.

There's roughly 30 deaths per year or so by lightning strikes...

So you can argue that you are 5 times as likely to be killed by a legal firearm than get struck by lightning!!!

Wait, if the probability of dying by lightning is only 20% of that of dying by legal firearms, then it to must be a problem... maybe we should do something about lightning.

Ya, we should push congress to legislate something to ban lightning, if we can ban lightning, surely that would be sufficient justification to ban currently legal guns.

bgz wrote:


just to expand those stats a bit... they make me think:

such a tiny amount of deaths by legal guns sounds like not a whole lot of bad guys are getting killed by citizens carrying for protection. Then is anyone really safer when armed, or just feeling that way incorrectly?

and

So, far and away most gun related deaths are caused by illegal guns. I'm not on the side of taking gun rights away, but I'd really like to see severe penalties whenever it can be proven who was the original owner that was careless enough to lose possession. Sounds like the real danger to innocent people is approved sales to those citizens unqualified to properly and safely have a weapon.



bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago

just to expand those stats a bit... they make me think:

such a tiny amount of deaths by legal guns sounds like not a whole lot of bad guys are getting killed by citizens carrying for protection. Then is anyone really safer when armed, or just feeling that way incorrectly?

and

So, far and away most gun related deaths are caused by illegal guns. I'm not on the side of taking gun rights away, but I'd really like to see severe penalties whenever it can be proven who was the original owner that was careless enough to lose possession. Sounds like the real danger to innocent people is approved sales to those citizens unqualified to properly and safely have a weapon.

frankj1 wrote:



I would argue the real danger to innocent people is not so innocent people ;)

delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
8 years ago

So, other problems cause more deaths than guns therefore we shouldn't try to solve gun deaths?

rfenst wrote:



Not quite, but because of the 2nd Amendment and the legal right to defend oneself, restricting/regulating/controlling guns may be the most problematic of potential solutions. Maybe working from the other end, like the anti-drunk driving campaigns that affected our acceptance of driving under the influence, to try to change how we view the responsibility of gun ownership, would be more effective use of limited time and money.


just to expand those stats a bit... they make me think:

such a tiny amount of deaths by legal guns sounds like not a whole lot of bad guys are getting killed by citizens carrying for protection. Then is anyone really safer when armed, or just feeling that way incorrectly?

and

So, far and away most gun related deaths are caused by illegal guns. I'm not on the side of taking gun rights away, but I'd really like to see severe penalties whenever it can be proven who was the original owner that was careless enough to lose possession. Sounds like the real danger to innocent people is approved sales to those citizens unqualified to properly and safely have a weapon.



frankj1 wrote:




The greatest number of deaths from guns is by suicides, using legal guns...suicide prevention efforts are well under way...to not great effect...mental health professionals do ask suicidal persons about access to guns and report to law enforcement, but most suicides happen without warning...

the gun industry says that gun owners prevent assaults regularly, but there aren't any credible data...

My home was burglarized, and the thieves cut open my gun safe and took it...they didn't find the other three that were stored in another part of the house...

I do think that we can do and should do a better job of screening people for gun ownership...beefing up "background"checks...
Krazeehorse
8 years ago
I've always said regarding motorcycle helmet laws that they were just about control and feeling good. If they really wanted to prevent serious injuries and save lives then they should require helmets while in all vehicles.
frankj1
8 years ago

I would argue the real danger to innocent people is not so innocent people ;)

bgz wrote:


can't argue against that.
even more reason to not allow legal guns to folks unable to maintain possession.
RMAN4443
8 years ago

I've always said regarding motorcycle helmet laws that they were just about control and feeling good. If they really wanted to prevent serious injuries and save lives then they should require helmets while in all vehicles.

Krazeehorse wrote:


.motorcycle helmets are less about safety, and more about containing the mess. ...on street bikes anyway. ....you get hit by a truck and that helmet doesn't offer much protection 😰
DrafterX
8 years ago
I've seen that mess before... Idiot tried to beat the yellow.. wish I had been anywhere else... 😟
delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
8 years ago
Final thought about gun control laws...there is no way that any proposed gun control law would require people to turn in newly declared illegal weapons...all efforts in the past "grandfathered" or allowed owners to keep weapons and ammo clips that were declared illegal...

There are so many of these guns and magazines in legal circulation, and they can last for generations ( I have a 19th century Winchester lever action rifle and 2 early 20th century S&W revolvers that shoot like new) that a new ban would have little to no effect...
Speyside
8 years ago
Delta, how do you regulate hate?
Abrignac
8 years ago

Delta, how do you regulate hate?

Speyside wrote:



You don't. It's called freedom of expression.
cacman
8 years ago

Delta, how do you regulate hate?

Speyside wrote:


Ask our princess Vicki. I'm sure he'll be glad to stoop to dropping the race card here shortly while preaching his righteous morality and a few biblical scriptures to us explaining why it's OK for him to race bait and demean anyone he disagrees with.

It will come shortly. Don't worry. You can't regulate it.
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

It is now obvious to me that regulating guns is the wrong solution to the "problem" of American gun deaths.

delta1 wrote:




Mental health.

It needs to really be addressed.

DrafterX
8 years ago
Bang your head..
Metal health'll drive you mad... 😟
Users browsing this topic