There is so much wrong with your statement... all packed into 12 words.
Do you realize you just openly acknowledged by stating "some truth in it" that you don't expect truth to be the main component?
You should be railing against the falsehoods, not supporting tripe that you are sure might have "some truth in it"...
As to your idiotic statement, no. I'm not going to read it because it's just another one of drafter's masturbatory fantasy postings.. He does this every other week, posts an article about someone who is not president, or anywhere in politics, written by someone who doesn't care that their work is the equivalent of cheap capri sun juice "contains 10% real truth extract!*", and furiously pounds his tiny erection from under his overhanging, hairy gut.
Meanwhile there is actual news out there (you know, Alabama electing a pedophile, the orange menace doing dumb things daily, the cheeto-in-chief trying to run our nation like a banana republic) going on daily that doesn't get posted here.
It's fodder for the dumb. My time is much better spent making fun of the dumb, and mocking people who are sure those articles are super important for us to see.
* truth extract is from 1946 census data and in no way relates to Clinton
victor809 wrote:
