Besides. The girl is 12.
Moore is accused of accosting teens. So she has a year...

tailgater wrote:

So if he was accused of harassing women of legal age, would you want to ban all women reporters?
And we shouldn't stop with Moore.
Get all the broads out of the white house, congress, hollywood and famous chef restaurants.

And here in Massachusetts they'd have to forbid male reporters on Beacon Hill because the gay senate president's husband has been groping for trouser snakes in exchange for promised support from hubby.

Nope.
Too limiting.

Besides. The girl is 12.
Moore is accused of accosting teens. So she has a year...

tailgater wrote:

Accused. With no evidence. Have any charges been filed? Any investigation started? Or are you basing everything you think about him on the accusations alone?

MACS wrote:

Spey... girls name is march. The interview was put up on sunday... no word as to when it was taped.

MACS/ gene don't get your panties in a bunch. I said accused not convicted feel free to reread my post and post your sincere apology... 🙂 This isn't a court of law and I don't have the power to put him in jail. I think a good rule of thumb though should be if you're not willing to leave a politician alone with your 15 year old daughter you probably shouldn't elect him to senate...

He will never be convicted and honestly I don't think he should be convicted. But thay doesn't mean he should be a senator or a high school gym teacher.

victor809 wrote:

I read your second sentence gene... I was just pointing out I have said nothing factually inaccurate.

But those panties you are wearing are a very nice lavender.

victor809 wrote:

I have nothing to apologize for.

But here's something for you to ponder... what if a woman came forward and said you had sexual relations with her while you were in college and she was only 15 and the media started running with it... but it was 10+ years ago?

How the hell are you going to prove your innocence? The yearbook writing was proven false, was it not? Doesn't that make the whole thing look just a bit contrived?

MACS wrote:

I have nothing to apologize for.

But here's something for you to ponder... what if a woman came forward and said you had sexual relations with her while you were in college and she was only 15 and the media started running with it... but it was 10+ years ago?

How the hell are you going to prove your innocence? The yearbook writing was proven false, was it not? Doesn't that make the whole thing look just a bit contrived?

MACS wrote: