Speyside
7 years ago
Does she ever shut up?
ZRX1200
7 years ago
She is female so.......


Appreciate your rhetorical post just the same
rfenst
7 years ago

Her mouth spews dog crap.
dstieger
7 years ago
Say what you will...I think she is incredibly good at her job
Ewok126
7 years ago
I just watched the video Cuomo and Conway spar over Trump's 'tough people' remark. I got to say, I would have slapped the piss out of both of em. Hes butt hurt over his perception of what "Trump meant when he said what he did, She's butt hurt because Cuomo takes it as such. The whole damn video was them arguing over butt hurtness instead of having an intellectual conversation or debate.

Now in all fairness I have not watched any other stuff of her and after that 10 minutes of what I just seen I never will so, I can not say but I will say this. Both her and Cuomo do not have the ability to keep their emotions in check when someone feels differently than they do. Which seems to be an issue with both our people of the US and of our government. The lack of willingness to have an open mind or even listen without berating one another has gotten so stupidly out of hand.

I feel this is her issue as well which leads to more of the immoral behavior and feeds more gas on the fire. People as a whole have come to behave in this manor which sucks. It has become a "who can interrupt who the most, the loudest,with name calling and shaming in hopes the other will give in which Cuomo did. So nope the only way she or Cuomo will ever shut up is if people quit feeding the animals. Everyone needs to learn to not let the others pull you up that emotional ladder because that is where they gain their power.

Just my 0.02
tailgater
7 years ago

Does she ever shut up?

Speyside wrote:



She's in a contest with Squaw E. Warren.



Speyside
7 years ago
rfenst
7 years ago

Say what you will...I think she is incredibly good at her job

dstieger wrote:



At what? Turning people off?
dstieger
7 years ago
IDK...wasn't aware that was her job....or that others are turned off. IMO, she does a good job of supporting and explaining a man who can be contradictory, inflammatory, even unsupportable, at times. She is smart and quick witted. I didnt say she turns you on (or anyone else except maybe Mr Conway.)
Considering the challenges that nearly everyone in Trump's orbit eventually succumb to, she manages to hang on and even thrive so far. Biggest controversy I recall was her saying something about Ivanka's clothes line being great....I may not agree with her and even get pissed at her seeming blind allegiance, but I admire her just the same.
dstieger
7 years ago
I almost forgot...she was the only campaign manager for a presidential candidate in 2016 that won...
frankj1
7 years ago

I almost forgot...she was the only campaign manager for a presidential candidate in 2016 that won...

dstieger wrote:


shares the award with Manafort, no?
dstieger
7 years ago
I suppose he, Bannon and Lewendowski have to get some credit, also....but, IIRC, she's the one who got the ball in the red zone
tailgater
7 years ago

A while back, she got attacked by the Main Stream Media for sitting cross-legged on a couch in the Oval Office.
When simple things like that can set people off, you know there is something else driving the hatred.




Her husband is from my hometown.
Makes for interesting discussions involving her within my local breadth of friends.
tailgater
7 years ago

I suppose he, Bannon and Lewendowski have to get some credit, also....but, IIRC, she's the one who got the ball in the red zone

dstieger wrote:



I thought Stormy Daniels took it in the end zone?

I gotta get a different news feed.


rfenst
7 years ago

I almost forgot...she was the only campaign manager for a presidential candidate in 2016 that won...

dstieger wrote:


So what. She is still unsuitable for public representation of the President and Presidency. And, I almost forgot something too. She is also the creator of "alternative facts".
dstieger
7 years ago

So what. She is still unsuitable for public representation of the President and Presidency..

rfenst wrote:


Why?
dstieger
7 years ago

So what.".

rfenst wrote:


The 'so what' is that it supports my contention that she is good at her job.
victor809
7 years ago
I actually agree with dstieg.... She's good at her job within the strict context of what she is trying to achieve.

I don't think she's "explaining" in a way that rfenst might recognize (ie, provide clarity of a point)....

Her job is less nuanced than that. It's more about throwing out just enough probable deniability that it gives cover to a moron president who says ridiculous things... She provides that explanations that people who already believe him want to hear. (Ie "bowling Green massacre"). She then gets all the media to televise it.

People who aren't idiots then ask why someone would hire such an idiot. Yet on the other side, his base is lapping it up and cheering. So it's successful.
victor809
7 years ago
Kellyanne Conway and her ilk are the trump administration's version of a phishing letter.

Those nigerian prince scams or any of the other email scams trying to get the victim to send an initial deposit, or send their bank account number aren't poorly written because the author isn't a native english speaker. They're poorly written to preemptively filter out anyone savvy enough to not send their money in at the end. The scammers don't want to waste their time going back and forth with someone who has a high likelihood of backing out at the last step (that step where $$ gets sent). They really only want responses from the very trusting/gullible/naive. They send millions and millions of emails.... if they sent more believable emails, imagine how much time they would lose talking to people who ultimately aren't gullible enough to buy the scam.

So think of the trump administration in that light. The message conway and her ilk are sending out isn't meant to convince rfenst, or frank that trump really is a smart guy who intended to tweet "covfefe" and those who are in the know got the message. They have a dumber audience they are trying to reach.
frankj1
7 years ago

Kellyanne Conway and her ilk are the trump administration's version of a phishing letter.

Those nigerian prince scams or any of the other email scams trying to get the victim to send an initial deposit, or send their bank account number aren't poorly written because the author isn't a native english speaker. They're poorly written to preemptively filter out anyone savvy enough to not send their money in at the end. The scammers don't want to waste their time going back and forth with someone who has a high likelihood of backing out at the last step (that step where $$ gets sent). They really only want responses from the very trusting/gullible/naive. They send millions and millions of emails.... if they sent more believable emails, imagine how much time they would lose talking to people who ultimately aren't gullible enough to buy the scam.

So think of the trump administration in that light. The message conway and her ilk are sending out isn't meant to convince rfenst, or frank that trump really is a smart guy who intended to tweet "covfefe" and those who are in the know got the message. They have a dumber audience they are trying to reach.

victor809 wrote:


as seen on T.V....rfenst and I are here to replace you.
Users browsing this topic