Q-Tards tend to love absolutes, and they tend to break up into scarily exact minded equilibrium. Problem is, the q-tarded among us buy into all the stupid sh*t the big orange tells them.

And the conspiracies... oh god, you guys believe all the stupid sh*t.

So you're not a q-tard? You don't believe in stupid sh*t? Prove it!

I'm creating this thread for the q-tarded to have a space to defend their idiotic beliefs.

You think the moon landing was fake? Prove it here.

You got chemtrails on the brain? Prove it here.

You think aliens anal probed you? Prove it here... ps, it was probably your uncle Steve.

So in all it's absolutel glory, you're either a q-tard, or you're not.... have at it.

What if HD believes his uncle Steve anal probed him.... but it actually was aliens?

What does the Q stand for?

The character that oversees all the cool R&D gadgets in the Bond movies.

I assume you are referencing Q-Anon or whatever it goes by?

Great thing for people to go down a rabbit hole, both believers and Cheeto haters.

*If you’re mad about Q_Anon and think Cheeto is bad you’re also a Q-Tard*

Prove me wrong.

Not mad about q-anon... I laugh at them, but not mad... definitely not mad, ... more... intrigue.

Cheeto being bad... that's obviously a fact using pretty much any definition of bad (most politicians are... bad).

As for your statement... 'if you're mad at the q-tard movement, and you believe that trump is "BAD", then you're a q-tard' is a false statement.

It certainly is possible that you're mad at the other qtards, and you think T is bad, and you are a qtard... but it doesn't guarantee it.

So your statement has been proven false.

I disagree.

You apology is accepted

Z... please tell me you're not one of the q-tarded... I mean, I'll still like you, but I'll be forced to make fun of you more lol.

Goofy premise. I guess Biden's latest attempt at speaking has you unnerved.
My question is how or more importantly why would anyone try to prove anything to someone who openly disavows logic?
Since you need logic to prove anything and you don't believe in logic this is indeed a goofy premise.
Maybe your in super position

A=3.2, therefore a duck.

That was too easy. NEXT!

Here's a couple on Chemtrails to get you started, I'm sure there's a lot more of both tinfoil and non-tinfoil research if you want to dig for it.

Old video of lady speaking to the UN about it:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aae98d 

Last paragraph:

"Moving from means to motive, while we hope to demonstrate here that no global SAI program could reasonably expect to maintain secrecy, we also consider who if anyone might wish to implement such a covert program. For one, SAI is global in effect, if not implementation (Keith 2000). SAI, thus, is not a precision weapon. Moreover, judged purely by commercial motives, it is difficult to see how one might utilize SAI solely for local gain without triggering substantial global spillovers, both negative and positive. While there might be a long list of contractors who would eagerly bid to vend hardware, supplies, and services to an SAI endeavor, and there might even be a role for patents along that supply chain (Reynolds et al 2017, 2018), we believe strongly that commercial profits must not be a motivating factor in any decisions about whether, when, where, and how to implement SAI. Any entity that intends to engineer the climate of the entire globe must act—and be seen to act—purely out of humanitarian and environmental considerations unclouded by aspirations of direct financial gain."


As for the moon, I completely believe they got there. I mean, what soup can with a BBQ attached to it wouldn't...?

I also think Q-anon is probably some type of Federal alphabet agency "task force" to pacify and keep tabs on the people who actually follow "him".

I found a superposition in an old Indian book.

Professing themselves to be wise they became fools...
Or in the words of Orwell " Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them"
Once you forsake God you have nothing left but buffoonery

Https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/08/31/harvard-promotes-claim-That-225/ 

lol, he quotes breitbart... lmfao... and Orwell...

Again, you're not on my level... go f*ck with someone you actually stand a chance against. I'll just make you look stupid.

You can't even know where you parked your car b
Let me know when you believe in logic then you can show me how clever you are. Till then you sir are a fool.
That's not an insult to your intelligence. It's a moral charge.

Is a man who requires an ominous being watching their every move to be moral... truly moral?

I can appreciate your sentiment though, if everyone were capable of understanding reality, then... well, that would solve all kinds of sh*t.

You're right about one thing though, always forgetting where I parked my car.

While I appreciate the joke about memory, you know that's not at issue. You can't know where you parked your car because you don't believe in logic and the law of non contradiction

Again... you see my words, they just don't filter correctly.

You want an absolute truth in our universe?

E = mc^2

There you go. Something that's absolutely true.