jeebling
2 years ago

Joey got off his handlers leash again to misremember a "true story".

Biden’s Surprise Live Interview with Howard Stern Goes Sideways After He Claims He “Got Arrested Standing on a Porch with a Black Family” During Civil Rights Movement (AUDIO)

By Cristina Laila Apr. 26, 2024 11:40 am


RayR wrote:



Is that the time that Joey didn’t want his kids growing up in a racial jungle?
View All Posts by User
Stogie1020
2 years ago
Howard Stern is a shell of his former self.

Pathetic...
View All Posts by User
jeebling
2 years ago
Stern has been a douche bag for a very long time now
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
Silly, you really thought the rich were going to pay higher taxes so the government could spend recklessly?

[frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan]



Biden Admin Justifies Tax Hike Based On Racial Criteria


The Biden administration’s analysis of its revenue proposals for fiscal year 2025 argues targeted tax hikes that disproportionately affect white people would ease racial wealth inequality.

Increasing taxes on capital gains and income-based wealth would reduce racial wealth inequality for black and Hispanic families, the Treasury Department outlined in the analysis published in mid-March.

The Treasury points out that white families disproportionately hold assets subject to capital gains tax or are in a higher tax bracket, meaning a hike in those taxes would benefit black and Hispanic families.

The Biden administration argues for taxing capital income for high-income earners at “ordinary rates,” increasing the top rate from 37% to 39.6% for those who earn more than $1 million a year. Taxes on net investment income would also be hiked by 1.2 percentage points to 5% for those who make over $400,000 per year, bringing the total top marginal rate to 44.6%.

“Taxing capital gains at 44.6% at the federal level — not to mention state taxes — would be economic suicide,” Preston Brashers, research fellow for tax policy in the Heritage Foundation’s Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Before the tax ever took effect, investors would rush to pull their money out of equities subject to such exorbitant tax rates. U.S. businesses would be starved for capital, and business activity would slow to a crawl. Ultimately, corporate income and capital gains income would fall off a cliff, so the net result would be less tax revenue, not more. The middle class and working class would be slammed with mass layoffs and lower real wages.”

President Biden Suggests A 44.6% Capital Gains Tax, Highest In History

The Treasury estimates that white families are the recipients of 92% of the benefits of preferential rates on capital gains and qualified dividends, compared to 2% and 3% for Hispanic families. Only 0.4% of white families, less than 0.05% of black families and 0.1% of Hispanic families will be affected by the proposed rule change on capital gains.

“So, if President Biden’s goal of redistribution is to make the rich poorer, his proposal would be successful,” Brashers told the DCNF. “But if the goal is to lift up the middle class, the plan would fail spectacularly. Note, even the Urban-Brooking Tax Policy Center use estimates that imply that the revenue-maximizing long-term capital gains rate is about 28%, so it’s clear that Biden’s proposal is on the wrong side of the Laffer curve.”

The proposal also calls for establishing a minimum 25% income tax that includes unrealized capital gains for those with wealth over $100 million. The Biden administration argues that the wealthiest taxpayers utilize their stake in unrealized gains to lower their total income and reduce their tax liability, but taxing unrealized gains may force many business owners to sell stakes in their company if they are not liquid enough to pay the burden.

“The wealthy already pay far more than their fair share, while the tax burden on large corporations ends up landing on individuals across the economy, including low-income individuals,” Chris Edwards, the Kilts Family Chair in Fiscal Studies at the Cato Institute, told the DCNF.

The Biden administration also calls for ending a “loophole” that allows families to postpone their estate tax burden by creating trust assets that benefit multiple future generations and are not taxed on the death of the beneficiary. Around 30% of white families receive an inheritance that would qualify as of 2019, compared to 10% for black families and 7% for Hispanic families.

“Left-wing Biden economists seem unable to appreciate that raising taxes on capital hurts labor. Capital and labor work together to produce economic growth,” Edwards told the DCNF. “They are complements. The Biden economists seem to hold the Marxist view that capital and labor are bitter enemies, and that the only way that labor can win is for the government to crush capital.”

The Biden administration is also proposing to expand the child tax credit, temporarily increasing the amount given per child and permanently restoring the full refundability provision. The Treasury argues that it will ease racial disparities since a disproportionate number of black and Hispanic kids have benefited from it in the past.

“These proposals would also increase the fairness of the tax system by addressing some of the features that have historically reinforced racial disparities,” the proposal reads. “Over time, these proposals are expected to increase wealth accumulation by low- and middle-income families and reduce racial wealth gaps.”

The proposal was released in conjunction with calls from the Biden administration to drastically increase spending for fiscal year 2025, adding at least $14.8 trillion to the national debt by the end of a presumptive second term for the president.

The national debt has continued to grow rapidly under President Joe Biden, totaling more than $34.55 trillion as of April 26, up from $34 trillion at the beginning of the year, according to the Treasury Department.

Huge government spending is also putting the U.S. economy at risk of stagflation, with first quarter growth only totaling 1.6% while inflation remains high at 3.5% in March year-over-year.

“This hints at the false view that sadly underlies much of the Biden administration’s economic policy: high-earners only achieve success through luck, and low-earners can only achieve success through government handouts,” Edwards told the DCNF. “That is an appalling, un-American view.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment from the DCNF.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/biden-admin-justifies-tax-hike-based-on-racial-criteria/ar-AA1nVC0y?cvid=99bba9ea65664e51ab134a8bf810a325&ei=15 


Remember when Trump said Biden was going to raise your taxes?
View All Posts by User
RayR
2 years ago
DMV...how to you expect the Biden/Obama regime to fundamentally transform Amerika into a Commie Progressive country without a stiff Progressive income tax? 😕
View All Posts by User
jeebling
2 years ago

Silly, you really thought the rich were going to pay higher taxes so the government could spend recklessly?

[frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan]



Biden Admin Justifies Tax Hike Based On Racial Criteria


The Biden administration’s analysis of its revenue proposals for fiscal year 2025 argues targeted tax hikes that disproportionately affect white people would ease racial wealth inequality.

Increasing taxes on capital gains and income-based wealth would reduce racial wealth inequality for black and Hispanic families, the Treasury Department outlined in the analysis published in mid-March.

The Treasury points out that white families disproportionately hold assets subject to capital gains tax or are in a higher tax bracket, meaning a hike in those taxes would benefit black and Hispanic families.

The Biden administration argues for taxing capital income for high-income earners at “ordinary rates,” increasing the top rate from 37% to 39.6% for those who earn more than $1 million a year. Taxes on net investment income would also be hiked by 1.2 percentage points to 5% for those who make over $400,000 per year, bringing the total top marginal rate to 44.6%.

“Taxing capital gains at 44.6% at the federal level — not to mention state taxes — would be economic suicide,” Preston Brashers, research fellow for tax policy in the Heritage Foundation’s Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Before the tax ever took effect, investors would rush to pull their money out of equities subject to such exorbitant tax rates. U.S. businesses would be starved for capital, and business activity would slow to a crawl. Ultimately, corporate income and capital gains income would fall off a cliff, so the net result would be less tax revenue, not more. The middle class and working class would be slammed with mass layoffs and lower real wages.”

President Biden Suggests A 44.6% Capital Gains Tax, Highest In History

The Treasury estimates that white families are the recipients of 92% of the benefits of preferential rates on capital gains and qualified dividends, compared to 2% and 3% for Hispanic families. Only 0.4% of white families, less than 0.05% of black families and 0.1% of Hispanic families will be affected by the proposed rule change on capital gains.

“So, if President Biden’s goal of redistribution is to make the rich poorer, his proposal would be successful,” Brashers told the DCNF. “But if the goal is to lift up the middle class, the plan would fail spectacularly. Note, even the Urban-Brooking Tax Policy Center use estimates that imply that the revenue-maximizing long-term capital gains rate is about 28%, so it’s clear that Biden’s proposal is on the wrong side of the Laffer curve.”

The proposal also calls for establishing a minimum 25% income tax that includes unrealized capital gains for those with wealth over $100 million. The Biden administration argues that the wealthiest taxpayers utilize their stake in unrealized gains to lower their total income and reduce their tax liability, but taxing unrealized gains may force many business owners to sell stakes in their company if they are not liquid enough to pay the burden.

“The wealthy already pay far more than their fair share, while the tax burden on large corporations ends up landing on individuals across the economy, including low-income individuals,” Chris Edwards, the Kilts Family Chair in Fiscal Studies at the Cato Institute, told the DCNF.

The Biden administration also calls for ending a “loophole” that allows families to postpone their estate tax burden by creating trust assets that benefit multiple future generations and are not taxed on the death of the beneficiary. Around 30% of white families receive an inheritance that would qualify as of 2019, compared to 10% for black families and 7% for Hispanic families.

“Left-wing Biden economists seem unable to appreciate that raising taxes on capital hurts labor. Capital and labor work together to produce economic growth,” Edwards told the DCNF. “They are complements. The Biden economists seem to hold the Marxist view that capital and labor are bitter enemies, and that the only way that labor can win is for the government to crush capital.”

The Biden administration is also proposing to expand the child tax credit, temporarily increasing the amount given per child and permanently restoring the full refundability provision. The Treasury argues that it will ease racial disparities since a disproportionate number of black and Hispanic kids have benefited from it in the past.

“These proposals would also increase the fairness of the tax system by addressing some of the features that have historically reinforced racial disparities,” the proposal reads. “Over time, these proposals are expected to increase wealth accumulation by low- and middle-income families and reduce racial wealth gaps.”

The proposal was released in conjunction with calls from the Biden administration to drastically increase spending for fiscal year 2025, adding at least $14.8 trillion to the national debt by the end of a presumptive second term for the president.

The national debt has continued to grow rapidly under President Joe Biden, totaling more than $34.55 trillion as of April 26, up from $34 trillion at the beginning of the year, according to the Treasury Department.

Huge government spending is also putting the U.S. economy at risk of stagflation, with first quarter growth only totaling 1.6% while inflation remains high at 3.5% in March year-over-year.

“This hints at the false view that sadly underlies much of the Biden administration’s economic policy: high-earners only achieve success through luck, and low-earners can only achieve success through government handouts,” Edwards told the DCNF. “That is an appalling, un-American view.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment from the DCNF.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/biden-admin-justifies-tax-hike-based-on-racial-criteria/ar-AA1nVC0y?cvid=99bba9ea65664e51ab134a8bf810a325&ei=15 


Remember when Trump said Biden was going to raise your taxes?

DrMaddVibe wrote:



This is pertinent to the thread on FED vs White House discussion.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
What did those waskly NASCAR fans create????



'Unity': Pro-Israel And Pro-Palestine Supporters Chant "F**k Joe Biden" In Solidarity As Democrats In 'Panic Mode'


Biden's Swing State Gains Over Trump Vanish on Economic Pessimism

In early March, President Biden and the Democrats called for the "Unity of all Americans."

Fast forward to the Marxist revolution spreading like stage four cancer at the nation's colleges and universities, anti-Israel and counter-protesters found common ground, or perhaps a glimpse of solidarity, when both sides were heard chanting "F**K Joe Biden" this week at the University of Alabama.

"It finally happened. Joe managed to get both sides of the protest to hate him for different reasons," X user Alex The Ghost wrote.

Others on X agreed...

See, he really did unify the country.
— Jason Lambeth (@JLambo79) May 1, 2024

The president and the radical left are walking a very fine line between supporting the Marxist kids at schools and their right to protest while simultaneously denouncing antisemitism. The surge in criticism from both the left and the right of the elderly president's Israel policy risks the unity of both sides in their hatred of the president.

Meanwhile, Axios reports Democrats are in full-blown' panic mode' behind the scenes as campus takeovers by extremists of their own party produce terrible optics ahead of the presidential election in November.

"The longer they continue, and the worse that they get, the worse it's going to be for the election overall," one House Democrat said.

The House Democrat warned that school chaos will only "bring out [the public's] most conservative side."

What's clear is that campus protesters are becoming a political liability for Biden and Democrats.

Republicans are now seizing on the opportunity from New York to California to inform voters that under this administration, the destruction and chaos of America continues. Add this chaos to the long list of failures by the Biden administration, including the migrant invasion, worsening drug overdose crisis, violent crime proliferating across metro areas, disastrous foreign policy moves in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, risking World War III, and, of course, the failure of Bidenomics that has ignited stagflation, crushing America's middle class.

"[Democrats] were trying to make a big deal out of these Trump trials, but they've taken a back seat" to the protests, John Feehery, a Republican strategist and former congressional aide, told Financial Times.

This week, the White House has been awfully silent on the campus takeover crisis.

"When will the president himself, not his mouthpieces, condemn these hate-filled little Gazas?" Tom Cotton, the Republican senator from Arkansas, told reporters on Wednesday.

"President Biden needs to denounce Hamas' campus sympathizers without equivocating about Israelis fighting a righteous war of survival," Cotton added.

A recent poll showed that 81 percent of voters aged 18 to 35 disapprove of Biden’s handling of the conflict in the Middle East.

Michael Moore, who correctly predicted Trump’s victory in 2016, even issued a plea to Biden urging him to accomplish a ceasefire or face defeat.

“We’re going to lose the election. We’re going to lose Michigan if we don’t turn this around. If President Biden doesn’t turn this around, that is going to do more to put Trump back in the White House. And I refuse to have Donald Trump back in the White House,” said Moore.

To sum up, the Democrats are in serious trouble if anti-Israel protesters and counter-protesters begin to march in solidarity around their hatred of Biden.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fk-joe-biden-anti-israel-counter-protesters-university-chant-solidarity-democrats-panic 


Now how dare you get upset if the DNC allows their Brown Shirts to blow off a little steam! The nerve of you!

Besdies...They weren't too fond of Pedo Joe to begin with...he just wasn't Hillary!
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
"Stunning On Multiple Levels": DOJ Admits To Evidence Tampering In Trump Classified Docs Case



Special Counsel Jack Smith's team admitted on Friday that key evidence in Trump's classified documents case was altered or manipulated - leaving two different chronologies; one that was digitally scanned vs. what's in the actual boxes.

Smith also misled the court, after originally telling U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon that the boxes remained "in their original, intact form as seized," when in a footnote they conceded that they removed classified documents and left placeholder sheets, which prosecutors acknowledged has created an "inconsistent" record - in which some of the documents are no longer in the same order as they appear in digital scans made in the fall of 2022.

"The Government acknowledges that this is inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court," the footnote reads, according to Just the News.

The finding comes after Cannon ordered a review into whether the FBI may have seized legally privileged records in response to a request from Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta.

"Since the boxes were seized and stored, appropriate personnel have had access to the boxes for several reasons, including to comply with orders issued by this Court in the civil proceedings noted above, for investigative purposes, and to facilitate the defendants' review of the boxes," wrote Smith's team in the Friday filing.

"There are some boxes where the order of items within that box is not the same as in the associated scans," the filing continues.

The organization of the documents in storage boxes at Mar-a-Lago is likely to be an important part of Trump‘s defense. His team is expected to argue the documents were stored in the White House in chronological order on the days that Trump received them, and that staff simply boxed them up and sent them to his home without him accessing them or knowing they contained classified information.

Smith’s team tried to downplay the problem and argued it’s not a reason for a delay in Trump’s case.

But several legal experts told Just the News the court filing essentially is an admission of evidence tampering, and could be problematic. -Just the News

"Prosecutors and investigators should never tamper with or alter evidence in their possession, including the order of documents in a box because one never knows what may become relevant or crucial to a court or jury later in a case," Alan Dershowitz told Just the News.

"This admission is stunning on multiple levels," said defense attorney Tim Parlatore, who worked on Trump’s team earlier in the classified documents case but no longer is involved, adding that the revelation "reinforces the incompetence" of prosecutors "in conducting basic criminal investigations and prosecutions that I observed when I was on the team.

"But at a deeper level, the loss of specific document locations is a destruction of exculpatory evidence," Parlatore added. "I went through all of the boxes at NARA and the document order was important because it was clear to us that the boxes had been untouched since leaving the White House.

"For prosecutors who are trying to prove that the defendants knowingly possessed these documents to then destroy the evidence that would undermine that claim is a very serious violation," he said.

In response to the filing, Trump said on Truth Social that "Deranged Jack has admitted in a filing in front of Judge Cannon to what I have been saying happened since the Illegal RAID on my home ... that he and his team committed blatant Evidence Tampering by mishandling the very Boxes they used as a pretext to bring this Fake Case."

Smith's Excuses

The prosecution offered several explanations for the manipulated evidence.

"There are several possible explanations, including the above-described instances in which the boxes were accessed, as well as the size and shape of certain items in the boxes possibly leading to movement of items," reads the filing. "For example, the boxes contain items smaller than standard paper such as index cards, books, and stationary, which shift easily when the boxes are carried, especially because many of the boxes are not full."

That said, Just the News also notes that altered evidence has featured prominently in previous political scandals.

Erasure of an 18 1/2 minute segment of Richard Nixon’s White House tapes became a very important aspect of the Watergate scandal.

The Iran-Contra scandal exploded during the Reagan years with the revelation that documents were shredded before they could be obtained by investigators.

The Hillary Clinton classified email scandal became more complicated in 2015 with the revelation that her team used a "Bleach Bit" program to erase emails on her secret computer server, and had email devices destroyed.

As Judicial Watch's Tom Fitton suggests, this is "Yet more reason to throw out this sham prosecution."

And as the Epoch Times notes, the case was brought against President Trump and others over their alleged violation of federal law in handling documents marked classified. Defendants have pleaded not guilty.

Neither Mr. Nauta nor other defendants in the case have responded yet to the new filing.

Mr. Nauta’s request for an extension is one of many documents that are under seal, or unavailable for perusal.

In another recent filing, President Trump’s team said that the case should be dismissed because prosecutors are motivated by “improper political animus,” pointing in part to how White House lawyers worked with the National Archives and Records Administration on its referral to the Department of Justice and how President Joe Biden has said that he was “making sure” President Trump “does not become the next president again.”

Prosecutors opposed the dismissal request but their opposition was filed under seal.

Read the filing below (via Just the News):

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/stunning-multiple-levels-doj-admits-evidence-tampering-trump-classified-docs-case 


Coordinated all at the White House.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
A real "Let Them Eat Cake" moment...soooo important...soooo deserving.


Biden Spends All Afternoon Awarding Medals To Other Democrats



Despite the fact that the world is teetering on the edge of global conflict, US college campuses being trashed by radical occupiers, and criminal illegals are still overwhelming the border, Joe Biden spent Friday afternoon awarding other Democrats medals.

Biden, who was incapable of saying ‘Presidential Medal of Freedom,’ awarded one each to Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Al Gore, Michael Bloomberg, and Rep. Jim Clyburn.

dhttps://t.co/8TGrYdQFd0 
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 3, 2024

It was just a big back-patting session for Democrats.

https://t.co/mhz8CAIA81 
— Brother Eric (@01IOTA) May 3, 2024

Al Gore and John Kerry were seemingly given medals for losing elections, with Biden stating that Gore “accepted the outcome of a disputed presidential election for the sake of our unity.”

These Democrats like standing behind each other.
— Jungle Ball (@JungleBall_) May 3, 2024

While Pelosi was given a medal for her actions on January 6th, which amounted to locking herself in a room, threatening to punch Donald Trump, and calling it an insurrection.

Freedom to make over $150,000,000.00 in insider trading while in congress.
— Nick Koutrakos (@NickKoutrakos) May 3, 2024

Is that Medal for facilitating the setup for January 6th or assisting the in Committee in disposing of evidence? pic.twitter.com/5EsUUci2Pb
— Bennetta Elliott (@belliott123) May 4, 2024

Bloomberg and Clyburn got medals for…something or other, but being pivotal in Biden’s election campaign was just pure coincidence.

BOUGHT AND PAID FOR. pic.twitter.com/uA1LUPuy0d
— The Pink Elephant in the Room (@PEITRblog) May 4, 2024

I want to congratulate one of our own, Mike Bloomberg, on receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom!

Although he wasn’t as great a mayor as DeBlasio and Adams, he was fiercely opposed to guns and sugary drinks.

Thank you President Biden. We in New York are celebrating today. pic.twitter.com/BXstjq4NkK
— Kathy Hochul Press Release (Parody) (@NY_Gov_PR) May 3, 2024

Hahaha of course you woke joke snowflakes think only democrats should get participation trophies 🏆 😆
— Doug Osborne (@DougOsb70438101) May 4, 2024

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-spends-all-afternoon-awarding-medals-other-democrats 

They all got one, did you?
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
Remember that time we tried to impeach Department of Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas and "Reap the Whirlwind" Schumer just said we don't have to hear the case and it simply went away?


"An Unlawful Sleight Of Hand": Biden Parole Program Has Flown Illegals To More Than 45 US Cities



In a recent development, a House Committee subpoena has forced the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to reveal details of its parole program designed to allow entry for thousands of individuals from several nations.

The program, established in October 2022, was initially tailored to facilitate entry for Venezuelans who had American sponsors and passed a vetting process. However, the scope of the program rapidly expanded, encompassing individuals from Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua as well - eventually flying illegal aliens to more than 45 cities across the United States.

According to the DHS documents, between January and August 2023, the parole program allowed over 200,000 individuals to enter the United States. While the program did not cover the cost of flights for these individuals, it permitted them to enter the country and make travel arrangements independently. Among the program's participants, Florida emerged as a leading destination, with around 80% of the 200,000 choosing to settle in cities such as Miami, Tampa, and Fort Lauderdale. Other prominent destinations included New York, California, Texas, Nevada, and Georgia.

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas defended the program, stating that it provided "a safe and orderly way to reach the United States" and asserting, though without presenting specific evidence, that the program "resulted in a reduction in numbers of those nationalities." Mayorkas also highlighted its global relevance, noting its role in addressing "the unprecedented level of migration throughout our hemisphere" and suggesting that other countries might see it as a model to manage irregular migration.

That said, the documents revealed that at least 1.6 million applications were still pending as of October 2023. The program currently admits approximately 30,000 individuals per month, granting them work permits and authorizing them to live in the country for two years.

Congressman Mark Green (R-Tenn.), Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, expressed strong criticism of the program, stating, "These documents expose the egregious lengths Secretary Mayorkas will go to ensure inadmissible aliens reach every corner of the country, from Orlando and Atlanta to Las Vegas and San Francisco." Green labeled the parole program "an unlawful sleight of hand" aimed at concealing the worsening border crisis from the American public.

In response to perceived poor handling of the border crisis, Mayorkas faced impeachment by the House of Representatives in February. This marked the second impeachment of a Cabinet secretary in U.S. history, and the first in nearly 150 years. However, the Senate's Democratic majority ultimately voted to end the trial without proceeding to a vote on conviction or acquittal, following repeated delays.

The disclosure of the DHS parole program documents has reignited debate over U.S. immigration policy and the handling of migration at the southern border, reflecting persistent tensions on these issues at both the national and international levels.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/unlawful-sleight-hand-biden-parole-program-has-flown-illegals-more-45-us-cities 

So, yeah lets hear it from all the people that are still voting for Biden.
View All Posts by User
jeebling
2 years ago
They only complain when Republicans put them on a bus.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
What??? Daring to speak the unspoken? Right before our very eyes?



Cognitive Decline: Biden Campaign Says They Will Shorten His Speeches



Who is actually running the country?

The Biden campaign team has admitted that they are seeking to shorten his speeches, claiming that they are seeking “quality over quantity,” but leading many to presume it is because he can barely talk.

Modernity.news' Steve Watson reports that Biden Deputy Campaign manager Quentin Fulks told MSBNC:

“Our campaign believes in quality over quantity. We believe that these touches, these smaller things that are getting to the point about what is going on in the stakes of this election are gonna be easier for the voters to tap into.”

NBC reports Biden's handlers are "looking to shorten his speeches" to limit his public displays of cognitive decline.

A Biden campaign spokesman insists it's about "quality over quantity." pic.twitter.com/GreyaVbgN6
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 4, 2024

The announcement led many to ask, how much shorter can his speeches get?

Is that..possible?

I suppose they can just have him show up, smile, crap his pants and leave.
— JD Sharp (@imjdsharp) May 4, 2024

Prediction: biden’s speeches will be two words within the next month….. Hi. Bye.
— I put my faith in God, not the government (@DontBidenMe) May 4, 2024

At the moment he can barely manage three minutes without slurring and losing a battle with the teleprompter.

I guess they can’t shorten his responses in press conferences since he hardly gives any.
— Kelkat (@Tweetytweeter63) May 4, 2024

Who's actually running the country?

👀 👀 👀
— iNeo_G 🚀 💫 ✨ (@iNeo_G) May 4, 2024

The campaign like to air pre recorded speeches, that have scores of edits and cuts in them, blatantly because he struggles to speak more than one sentence at a time.

And when Biden goes off script, he does something idiotic like calling Japan a Xenophobic country:

They are already hiding him from the press after failing to disguise that he can barely walk.

Probably because when he does encounter the press, he freezes and looks like he’s crapping himself:

https://t.co/RVjzPJoTma 
— Tex-Mex Trumpian (@TexicanTrumpian) May 4, 2024

Is it any wonder he is less popular than any other president in modern history:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cognitive-decline-biden-campaign-says-they-will-shorten-his-speeches 


What will become of our feeble, idiotic and maniacal stupor duo???

Tune in same Bat time...same Bat channel
View All Posts by User
Speyside2
2 years ago
We are in trouble as a nation. Neither candidate should be president in my opinion. Truly I cannot vote for either in good conscience. I think I will write in the speaker of the house. At least he is trying to run the country instead or trying to destroy it.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

We are in trouble as a nation. Neither candidate should be president in my opinion. Truly I cannot vote for either in good conscience. I think I will write in the speaker of the house. At least he is trying to run the country instead or trying to destroy it.

Speyside2 wrote:



That's a wasted vote, and wasted effort and faulty. That's not going to work. You're going to have to pull for one or the other. Especially if you're one of the supposed 81 million that did last time!
View All Posts by User
Speyside2
2 years ago
Individually I do not care who our president is, who is in congress, and who is on Scotus. Sure it effects my life, but only to a small extent. Overall I am able to do as I please. I am to damn old to worry or be angry. I have better ways to use my time and my energy. So no, it is not a wasted vote to me. When there is no one worth voting for anarchy is an excellent option.
View All Posts by User
Abrignac
2 years ago

Individually I do not care who our president is, who is in congress, and who is on Scotus. Sure it effects my life, but only to a small extent. Overall I am able to do as I please. I am to damn old to worry or be angry. I have better ways to use my time and my energy. So no, it is not a wasted vote to me. When there is no one worth voting for anarchy is an excellent option.

Speyside2 wrote:




Last I checked you can vote for anyone listed or you can write in a separate name regardless of what chatter comes out of the peanut gallery.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

Individually I do not care who our president is, who is in congress, and who is on Scotus. Sure it effects my life, but only to a small extent. Overall I am able to do as I please. I am to damn old to worry or be angry. I have better ways to use my time and my energy. So no, it is not a wasted vote to me. When there is no one worth voting for anarchy is an excellent option.

Speyside2 wrote:



That's awesome and all...totally get the sentiment. Not really all about you nor me. Take a hard look at how America has fallen under the current administration. The legacy of America isn't up to those that have lived 3/4 of their lives with Freedoms that will not be afforded to their children and grandchildren. Those are facts. While we have a light estimate of 11 million people that have invaded America, their children and grandchildren will not be afforded the same thats being given away.

You can hide behind a third party candidate and all you're doing is weakening one of them more than the other. Your vote is sacred and I totally agree; however the effects of that will impact a nation. Don't believe me? Look what happened.

You do you though.
View All Posts by User
Speyside2
2 years ago
Which side will save our freedoms? It appears to me both sides want to take them away. If you would like I will get specific. Also, I think there is a real solution but no one has the guts to do it. If you want I will get specific. A discussion with you is good for me.
View All Posts by User
Abrignac
2 years ago

Which side will save our freedoms? It appears to me both sides want to take them away. If you would like I will get specific. Also, I think there is a real solution but no one has the guts to do it. If you want I will get specific. A discussion with you is good for me.

Speyside2 wrote:




Too bad more people don’t think the way you do. They would rather vote for a 💩 candidate than go off the reservation and vote for change. It’s because of that mentality we are left with garbage we have as the two front runners. If more people voted like you the Democrats and Republicans would be forced to field better candidates to compete for the moderate voters.
View All Posts by User
RayR
2 years ago
The other day Joey awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Al Gore, Michael Bloomberg, Nancy Pelosi, and John Kerry.
Our freedoms are safe and secure now.](*,)
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com