get outta there, man...I gotta pee!

frankj1 wrote:

I count Anth among my many friends, came through for each other in the worst of personal times, broke bread even.

I listen to everything he says, as he does for me as well. He just might make a point I had not considered.

Not surprisingly, there are some things on which we agree, and many times where we disagree. Neither of us is dogmatic, each has probably benefitted from this willingness to believe our "side" could be wrong about some things. No one can always be right, nor always wrong.

Surprisingly to you, though, we fully support and respect each other and even understand it's our differences on various issues that reflect the way we both think it is supposed to work in this particular country. Consensus opens the door for dictators.

You're gonna need to spray Fabreeze when you leave.

frankj1 wrote:

well, Peaches, yet again you've moved the goalpost. But my one time answer on this misdirection is that your count is more fraudulent than the false claims of the rigged election.

As soon as the most ruthless right winger does evil, you redefine him/her/them as leftist BECAUSE of the evil action.
You're one of very, very few that knowingly falsely claim Nazis are commies. Stalin would be shocked, shocked I say.

I'm done ruining Anth's Thoughts Upon a Throne Thread.

frankj1 wrote:

"When the party became the National Socialist German Workers’ Party or the Nazis, its program included the following:

The National Socialist German Workers’ Party is not a worker’s party in the narrow sense of the term: It represents the interests of all honestly creative labor. It is a liberty-loving and strictly nationalist party and therefore fights against all reactionary trends, against ecclesiastical, aristocratic, and capitalist privileges and every alien influence, but above all against the overpowering influence of the Jewish-commercial mentality in all domains of public life. ...

It demands the amalgamation of all regions of Europe inhabited by Germans into a democratic, social-minded German Reich. ...

It demands plebiscites for all key laws in the Reich, the states and provinces." ...

https://mises.org/wire/unique-evil-left [/color]

get outta there, man...I gotta pee!

frankj1 wrote:

Don’t know why you bother Frank. RayRay has proven over and over again that he’s a one truck pony. That’s why I’ve had his posts blocked for months now. Thanks for not quoting him. It’s doubtful he had anything of value to add to the conversation and as such you spared me his drivel.

Abrignac wrote:

You ungrateful toilet thinker you. I praise your truckstop throne reflections and you throw it back in my face.

And about your stall buddy Frankie. Just asking him a simple question is bothersome to his highbrow Massachusets Yankeeness I guess. He must feel it's beneath him to converse with the underclass. Same with you I suppose?

And another thing....HA! You can't block me! [laugh

RayR wrote:

LOSER 101
Frank is truly friends with many normal CBid folks.
His name shouldn't come out of your mouth to try to insult him.

rfenst wrote:

Leave it to RayRay to hijack a thread. He’s pretty good at adding zero to the conversation.

BTW, last laugh is on you asshole. I can and do have you blocked.

https://i.postimg.cc/QCNqFc1Q/IMG-2138.jpg 

Abrignac wrote:

I called you Peaches cuz zrx mentioned it and it made sense

frankj1 wrote:

Welcome to round 2 of problem solving from the truck stop toilet stall think tank.

So as I was perched on the throne enjoying my daily deposit earlier I had an epiphany. Seems to me that 98.2% of those supporting forced vaccinations are also the loudest green energy proponents as well as the most vocal abortion rights supporters. In addition, they paint themselves as the smaht crowd. But, are they that smart?

Let’s explore. Since they support abortion rights they’ve shown a propensity to end life if need be. When the facts are taken at face value a solution becomes readily available. The vaccine supporters should rethink their position because according to their rhetoric the absence of the vaccine would lead to hundreds of thousands or even millions of deaths worldwide.

But in their eyes is that really bad? Think about the amount of greeness an absence of the vaccine would yield. Fewer cows farting since you don’t have as many people to feed. Less cars on the road. Fewer homes to heat etc…. And remember the complacency with death exhibited by the support of abortion rights.

Seems like a win/win?

Abrignac wrote:

For years I heard about "Conservative Think Tanks". At last I truly understand the process.

Thanks Anthony.

Brewha wrote:

Me a conservative? I’m sure there are plenty of “conservatives” here that would argue that. On the other hand, I personally believe those labels are somewhere far south of stupid simply because to claim a label one needs to fit the cookie cutter description that’s defined by said label. As far as I’m concerned nothing is as black and white as any particular identified group desires. Plus to be accepted into the fold of one of those groups one needs to drink all the Kool-Aid in the cup, not just a sip here and there.

If you must give it a label then I’d say Pragmatic Think Tank would be much more accurate.

Abrignac wrote: