When a judge says that the Constitution doesn’t fly in their courtroom and then makes their ruling follow that ideology, I think they should be disbarred. Right or left, I don’t discriminate on political party or affiliation. If I give “my side” a pass then it will surely come back in spades.

jeebling wrote:

ARE YOU OF THE OPINION THAT NO JUDGE CAN DECLARE A LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

rfenst wrote:

ARE YOU OF THE OPINION THAT NO JUDGE CAN DECLARE A LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

rfenst wrote:

No. But I am of the opinion that no judge can defy the Constitution by saying that an amendment does not apply in her courtroom. I guess you disagree with me if I read the ALL CAPS properly.

jeebling wrote:

See it for what it is and move on. It’s fairly obvious that she is anti-gun. She also realizes that every step an appellee takes in the judicial process costs money. She is also well away that the higher up the ladder a person appeals the higher the cost for each subsequent step. So essentially what she’s saying is “I know I’ll eventually get overruled, but at least I can force you to spend more money in the process.”

Abrignac wrote:

No. But I am of the opinion that no judge can defy the Constitution by saying that an amendment does not apply in her courtroom. I guess you disagree with me if I read the ALL CAPS properly.

jeebling wrote:

I understand this is a NY judge, and I’m not one of the lizard brained muh rights guys….that was a highly inappropriate thing for her to say.

And it wasn’t her only wrong action in this case.

Yes litigants get appeals and possibly ultimately SCOTUS. But this is how the left has waged war on all kinds of rights. That’s not even my biggest issue though it’s these actions not being discussed for what they are and what it means. We have a largely idiotic society and we have a decidedly emotional conversation ruling the public square day.

This aren’t far from a very dark direction.

ZRX1200 wrote:

That should be grounds for disbarring. Knowingly making a ruling that is wrong as a punishment??

The 2nd amendment wasn't written into the constitution for self protection... it was written to allow the people to overthrow a corrupt gov't. We've reached that point.

MACS wrote: