MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
On his way out the door he signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act.

Gets rid of the WEP, or Windfall Elimination Provision, which reduced the amount of SS benefits for people who had other income from pensions and such. Military, LE, Fire, and some Gov't workers.

If you paid into the system, you should not get your benefit reduced because you have other income.
deadeyedick
a year ago
It's much easier to agree with someone who is scratching your back.
MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

It's much easier to agree with someone who is scratching your back.

deadeyedick wrote:



Fair enough, however...

I paid into SS for 21 years... WEP would have reduced my SS benefit significantly because I have a CalPers pension (which I also paid into for 13 years at 9% a paycheck).

He ain't scratching my back, he is merely letting me collect what I should for having paid into it and not reducing it because I paid into a different one.

Before the change, had you paid into SS for 30 years, no reduction would take place. But because I chose a different career path which has its own system, I didn't reach 30 years of contribution.

Edit: I don't get anything extra... they're just going to give me what I earned without penalizing me for earning another.
Mr. Jones
a year ago
Excellent MACS!!

YOU PAID $$'s into each...
You deserve both amounts in full.

But , joe stranosa and BATH HOUSE BARRY OBAMA BOTH STOLE
$1 MILLION IN CASH FROM ME...
THEY DIDNT GIVE ME BACK ANYTHING...

MAYBE KASH PATEL can help me get it back and some well deserved retribution against the FBI-SSG division and the 200+ agents who tried to kill me or put in jail...

We'll see...
deadeyedick
a year ago

Fair enough, however...

I paid into SS for 21 years... WEP would have reduced my SS benefit significantly because I have a CalPers pension (which I also paid into for 13 years at 9% a paycheck).

He ain't scratching my back, he is merely letting me collect what I should for having paid into it and not reducing it because I paid into a different one.

Before the change, had you paid into SS for 30 years, no reduction would take place. But because I chose a different career path which has its own system, I didn't reach 30 years of contribution.

Edit: I don't get anything extra... they're just going to give me what I earned without penalizing me for earning another.

MACS wrote:



Not saying ya don't deserve it.
Gene363
a year ago
What's fair is fair. =d> =d> =d>
puffymcpufferson
a year ago

On his way out the door he signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act.

Gets rid of the WEP, or Windfall Elimination Provision, which reduced the amount of SS benefits for people who had other income from pensions and such. Military, LE, Fire, and some Gov't workers.

If you paid into the system, you should not get your benefit reduced because you have other income.

MACS wrote:



Social security is a Socialist program.

Socialism: From each their ability to each their need.

I'll be dead before I can collect, so it's as big of an entitlement as welfare in my perspective. Would I be glad to get it if I manage to survive while working until I'm 67? Yes! I can be petty and entitled too.

But as for being a social system, if a person has worked for a socially funded entity and has a pension that was amassed with social funds, they're already getting theirs. From each their ability to each their need. Socialism is socialism. WEP is the antithesis of a social program. This seems like rooting for the chipping away of a program one may very well need.
MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
I don't disagree with you at all, Puff... I think it should be abolished and let people do their own saving (or not).

It is, and always has been a ponzi scheme. However, I did contribute to it for 21 years and would at least appreciate the return of what I put in before they abolish it.

Do I need it? Nope. But they took my money, so I will damn sure take it back.
Gene363
a year ago

I don't disagree with you at all, Puff... I think it should be abolished and let people do their own saving (or not).

It is, and always has been a ponzi scheme. However, I did contribute to it for 21 years and would at least appreciate the return of what I put in before they abolish it.

Do I need it? Nope. But they took my money, so I will damn sure take it back.

MACS wrote:



100%

frankj1
a year ago

On his way out the door he signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act.

Gets rid of the WEP, or Windfall Elimination Provision, which reduced the amount of SS benefits for people who had other income from pensions and such. Military, LE, Fire, and some Gov't workers.

If you paid into the system, you should not get your benefit reduced because you have other income.

MACS wrote:


The Lovely Caren gave 35 years of excellence as a Speech and Language Pathologist (speech terrorist) but also before and intermittently during those decades of service worked at jobs in which she paid into SS for x amount of quarters that normally would have been sending her x amount of SS dollars monthly...but she has actually been receiving a far less percentage because of her other income and pension. She also paid in heavily to said pension.

We will gladly take what we feel she deserves, though it will still be considerably less than if she had never had her outstanding career helping the children of so many others.

Political economic philosophy aside, the reality of our lives in the US of A currently includes SS and this is a fair thing for people like her and like you.
MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
Yeah, Frankie... I guess the original purpose of this post was to say that even though I absolutely despise the rotten SOB Biden... I have to give credit where it's due. He did something right.
BuckyB93
a year ago
If I was given the option of taking a lump sum of what I paid into social security and roll it over into my IRA account... I would take that in a heartbeat.

I trust myself with my money way more than I trust any government agency with my money.
puffymcpufferson
a year ago
When we pay SSI duty, we are paying for the generation before us. We do not pay in and withdraw. The current working generation pays that pension. The first generation of SSI pensioners didn't pay a single red cent into the program. I am currently paying a lot of you....[sarcasm] quit horsing around and get back to work!
deadeyedick
a year ago

If I was given the option of taking a lump sum of what I paid into social security and roll it over into my IRA account... I would take that in a heartbeat.

I trust myself with my money way more than I trust any government agency with my money.

BuckyB93 wrote:



I agree completely but you are forgetting that the gobment can't redistribution your money iff they allow you to keep it.
MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

I agree completely but you are forgetting that the gobment can't redistribution your money iff they allow you to keep it.

deadeyedick wrote:



I agree with Bucky as well... and DED, here. I would happily take that money back in a lump sum and receive nothing else from SS.

That would actually probably save a lot of money, too... I'd have to extrapolate the math, though... and I ain't smart enough.
drglnc
a year ago

On his way out the door he signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act.

Gets rid of the WEP, or Windfall Elimination Provision, which reduced the amount of SS benefits for people who had other income from pensions and such. Military, LE, Fire, and some Gov't workers.

If you paid into the system, you should not get your benefit reduced because you have other income.

MACS wrote:




This had to be done! should have been done sooner!


i know someone now that is worried because of current language, they receive Military retirement after 20 years of service, they receive medical disability pay from the government due to medical malpractice related to VA treatment of an illness toed to va treatment and are now being told they may lose some of that income as "double dipping" yet they were not allowed to sue for medical malpractice and could lose alot...
puffymcpufferson
a year ago

This had to be done! should have been done sooner!


i know someone now that is worried because of current language, they receive Military retirement after 20 years of service, they receive medical disability pay from the government due to medical malpractice related to VA treatment of an illness toed to va treatment and are now being told they may lose some of that income as "double dipping" yet they were not allowed to sue for medical malpractice and could lose alot...

drglnc wrote:



My pops was down $5000 a year due to a career of military, forestry and public employment. Full retirement was taken in a place he could afford. A man born in 1934 understood loud and clear that compromise in lifestyle must be met on public retirement. This is concept he gained from his parents, born pre 1930 (first gen ss pensioners.) I never once heard him or his Great War Vet father complain. 2 things we will all be socially admonished for are airing our laundry and entitlement. What good is Social Security when we destroy our security in socialization? SS is intended to be just enough money to carry on in a dirt town with the health benefits of socialization. More rugged people with grater struggles have done more with less and a big smile. All without whining. Pops still made good money, just $5k less because all sources of income were already from public funding.

I also did VA advocacy with a Corpsman husband and his JAG wife. I'd do interviews. When represented properly, malpractice claims against the VA generally resulted in 110% disability payouts. That's $3300 a month and full medical for a 4-year signature, $4400 for 10, and $5600 for career. It's not a broken system it's just bureaucratic as all get out.
rfenst
a year ago

This had to be done! should have been done sooner!


i know someone now that is worried because of current language, they receive Military retirement after 20 years of service, they receive medical disability pay from the government due to medical malpractice related to VA treatment of an illness toed to va treatment and are now being told they may lose some of that income as "double dipping" yet they were not allowed to sue for medical malpractice and could lose alot...

drglnc wrote:


Tort Deform!
Users browsing this topic