tailgater
22 years ago
Liberals may not be irresponsible by nature, but their ideals breed irresponsiblity within the general populus.
Big government social programs are well intended cancers that promote complacency.
JonR
22 years ago
Yo C-Bid db:

"Thanks for the compliment...
You should know that the term "neo-con" is not meant to be deragatory. I have seen right wing journalists use the term to desribe themselves on numerous occasions. On CSPAN last week I watched William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and frequent guest analyst on Fox News refer to himself as a neo-con without one ounce of shame. Brit Hume is another I've seen do it... If they have have no problem with self referencing themselves as neo-cons, then it really shouldn't be such a big deal."

What an asinine statement on your part. You are saying because two men call themselves neo-cons, all conservatives should accept that title.

What if two liberals called themselves asswipes, then it should be no big deal if I referred to you as an ****, is that what your saying?

I do find the term "neo-con" not to my liking, especially in the way you sling it around in your rebuttals.

JonR

Ps: Say hello to your cousin baghdad bob for me.
RICKAMAVEN
22 years ago
Charlie

i didn't know you were a speed reader.
RICKAMAVEN
22 years ago
i undersand bush has a book coming out soon. it does not include the crayons,
tailgater
22 years ago
"What if two liberals called themselves asswipes..."

What do you mean "what if"???
Charlie
  • Charlie
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
22 years ago
Rick

I am a speed reader, but would not read all of the Clinton Crap one way or another, I did however, read enough to justify my sentiments on the book, and it did not come with crayons either!
Charlie
  • Charlie
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
22 years ago
Joe

Good point!

"What if Bubba had decided to get Osama when he had the opportunities to do so and could not make up his mind, probably was "ballin" with Monica......"

Charlie
Users browsing this topic