Let me try to clear up your confusion. Probably won't work, but I'll try anyway. You connected nazis to the OWS'rs. I said 'YAY' the guilt by association game and brought in Duke as an example of how that game worked and could be applied to the teabaggers. You then accused me of playing the guilt by association game. Strange that.
The only comparison I was making between MLK and other movements that people respect now is that they also were 'illegal' and broke laws. So using the 'they break laws so therefore they are wrong' argument is bs since morality isn't judged by what is legal.
If anything I'm trying to help you make a logical and consistant argument.
I know the conversation can get a little complicated to keep track of so I hope that helps.
FuzzNJ wrote: