I'm not anti porn but if you think it's harmless and you are not financing murder, kidnapping and rape it's because you don't want to know.
teedubbya wrote:
ok that's Fnn moronic,,
you'll never win this debate,,
The affects of Legal Porn with consenting whores is the same as abortion on a society,,, ?
dude..
I don't even think we should outlaw doctors performing unnecessary mutilations that result at times in death. Some zealots would call that murder.
I just worry about who gets to define such things and am amazed at the wisdom of our founding fathers.
Wheel, I am against abortion, just dont think that rape victum doesnt have any rights, and to make someone who has gone thru it and have the further trauma of raising a child she didnt ask for in the first place.
drywalldog wrote:
Ya see ?
The truely innocent child in the womb did'nt have a say regarding when it was conceived. Sure it may be under traqgic circumstances.
But, the precious human life does have the right to gestate and be born.
See, the lib attitude toward this diminshes the value of life.
Me, I'm a Catholic, pro life anti death penalty guy,,
consistent, and all
and sure I like da porn
Porn is likely more detrimental to our society than abortion.
You are an Idiot..
There is a good chance some of the porn you have watched was not consensual, and there was human trafficking and likely one life or more taken as a direct result. But pretend it isn't so.
There's a good chance yo momma would've aborted you if it was legal in 60s.
cool with dat ?🍺
I am Catholic too Wheel, maybe the right thing would be to remove the growing fetus from the rape victum and force it upon someone else, transplant it to someone who believes there should be no abortion?
Another idiotic response...
What if ?
If an unfortunate minority woman was raped and the child in her would grow up and discover the the cure for all cancers ?
It'd be ok then to let the child live, right ?
Or, he /she would struggle, raise a family and love her /his family ? They would make no impact on society ?. So we should abort all of them because it is convenient and might cost us less ?
please tell me?
I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."
hmm ?
screwing on camera for $$ vs klling a baby in the 3rd trimester .
wheelrite wrote:
Wheel... how many abortions do you actually think occur in the 3rd trimester?
I wish people would look crap up before they start forming opinions.
victor809 wrote:
One is too many...
Who doesn't want there to be the right to abortion following rape? Just curious (not critical)?
rfenst wrote:
I would think the rapist would be in favor of the abortion. Cheaper than paying child support.
