All of the above created and perpetuated primarily by private industry with a vested interest in continuing the practice, not backed by hard science, and milk is soothing for ulcers...it just doesn't treat the problem (it is a virus).
The healthcare industry, the CDC, and almost every doctor on the planet doesn't have a vested interest in promoting vaccinations, a group of pharmaceutical companies do. While the early inclusion of mercury as a preservative in some vaccinations was probably a poor choice, it overall hasn't effected the overall positive impact of the program. The numbers prove over and over that vaccinations in EVERY form saves lives. The reason we have the luxury of having this debate is because the program has been so successful at reducing the impact of disease on our society (it is called "herd immunity") to such an extent that those who choose not to vaccinate themselves (i.e. play Russian Roulette) have to date been lucky because the vaccinations are doing their job.
I am vaccinated for everything that I can be and so are my children...I will live through the next epidemic, I hope you and yours do too...
SMGBobbyScott wrote:
Old wive's tale (or junk science) about milk--- treatment for ulcers typically involves antibiotics to kill the H. pylori bacterium and other medications to reduce the level of acid in your digestive system. Gastric ulcers are eroded lesions in the esophagus, stomach or duodenum lining, most likely a result of H.pylori bacteria infection and inflammation. Milk does more harm than good. While coating the stomach lining, which in theory should help, milk, which is officially declared an alkaline- forming food, also steps up the production of stomach acids due to it's cell killing fats which diminish supply of nourishment to cells due to clogged capillaries AND its protein which when digested, produces uric acid.
This is why milk will ultimately worsen, rather than heal, gastric pain and ulcers. End of story.
As far as, the herd inoculation theory protecting the few that go unvaccinated, it's been neither proven nor disproven. I suppose the more you repeat an opinion, the more it becomes "fact".
I'll grant you this, vaccines MAY save some lives BUT the number of lives it destroys is ultimately much higher. What I mean by that, is that some lives saved by limited exposure to a pandemic's disease virus is far supplanted IMHO by the incalculably larger numbers of people (and especially children) killed, injured, & maimed (immunological problems ranging from birth defects to childhood asthma & diabetes) by the injections. Much of its effects may take place years down the road when you are least likely to make the connection to the culprit. I too, hope that you and yours survive the next epidemic. Just make sure that you have assisted living insurance if your dementia kicks in while in your 50's. Me? I'd rather be dead than part of the ever increasing "living dead" time bombs.
Don't despair with me & others like me. We were once among the many sheep like you who willingly lined up to receive our shots & swallow the lie. Despite the ever increasing number of damaged children since the 90's with learning difficulties and other developmental diseases, we also meant no harm to ourselves and others...
I will refrain from commenting further on the mostly junk science based & money- driven vaccine program which will be disproven some day IMO. Unfortunately, too late for many. Let's agree to disagree. I've fought this fight many times- too many times, & am no longer interested in dissuading people who blindly obey their doctor gods.
God bless & good luck.
Edited by user
13 years ago |
Reason: Not specified
